medsovetМедицинский СоветMeditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council2079-701X2658-5790REMEDIUM GROUP Ltd.10.21518/ms2023-079medsovet-7438Research ArticleДИССЕРТАНТDISSERTANTМедицинские научные конференции и социальные сетиMedical scientific conferences and social networkshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-7881АлфимовА. Е.AlfimovA. Е.

Алфимов Александр Евгеньевич – кандидат медицинских наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Институт цифровой медицины.

119991, Москва, ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2

Аlexander Е. Alfimov - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Digital Medicine Institution, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).

8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

alex.alfimov@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-2372-7168ТрофимоваА. А.TrofimovaA. A.

Трофимова Анжелика Алексеевна – студентка

119991, Москва, ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2

Аnzhelika А. Trofimova - Student, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).

8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

anzhel-trofim@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-3858-0338МатвиенкоА. А.MatvienkoA. A.

Матвиенко Арсений Александрович – студент

119991, Москва, ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2

Аrsenii А. Matvienko - Student, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).

8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

scp.alpha9@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-6626-6485КодалаеваМ. В.KodalaevaM. V.

Кодалаева Марина Владимировна - лаборант, кафедра анатомии и гистологии человека.

119991, Москва, ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2

Мarina V. Kodalaeva - Laboratory Assistant, Department of Human Anatomy and Histology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).

8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991

marinacb66@mail.ruПервый Московский государственный медицинский университет имени И.М. Сеченова (Сеченовский Университет)РоссияSechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Russian Federation20231304202304164168Copyright © Алфимов А.Е., Трофимова А.А., Матвиенко А.А., Кодалаева М.В., 20232023Алфимов А.Е., Трофимова А.А., Матвиенко А.А., Кодалаева М.В.Alfimov A.Е., Trofimova A.A., Matvienko A.A., Kodalaeva M.V.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.med-sovet.pro/jour/article/view/7438Введение

Введение. Медицинские конференции – это ключевой источник новых и актуальных знаний, необходимых практикующим врачам. Врачи используют социальные сети, чтобы обмениваться с коллегами этими знаниями. В результате в соцсетях возникает активное обсуждение тем, затронутых в научных докладах. Эта инициатива имеет определенное образовательное значение, которое активно исследуется. Дискуссии, возникающие в соцсетях вокруг таких сообщений, делают доступными идеи, инсайты, мнения и опыт коллег и быстро повышают осведомленность о новых клинических исследованиях и научных данных.

Цель

Цель. Изучить, как часто российские врачи используют доступные социальные сети (vrachirf.ru, doktornarabote.ru, vk.com) для того, чтобы делиться с коллегами информацией, полученной в ходе научных конференций.

Материалы и методы

Материалы и методы. Мы выполнили поиск сообщений по ключевым словам, относящимся к медицинским конференциям, и отобрали среди результатов поиска посты, авторы которых, будучи врачами, раскрывали отдельные элементы содержания научных докладов.

Результаты

Результаты. Большинство постов в соцсетях, посвященных медицинским конференциям, являются объявлениями о предстоящих или прошедших событиях, в которых не упоминаются элементы содержания докладов. Мы выявили только 65 записей за последние 4–12 мес., в которых врачи делились фактами и идеями, доложенными на научных конференциях. Записи, размещенные в закрытых врачебных соцсетях, вызывали активное содержательное обсуждение в отличие от постов в массовой соцсети vk.com.

Выводы

Выводы. Врачи очень редко делятся в соцсетях фактами и идеями, представленными на российских научных медицинских конференциях. При этом врачи проявляют существенный интерес к этим записям в соцсетях и активно их обсуждают. Дальнейшее изучение данного феномена позволит оценить его образовательный потенциал и найти пути его эффективного использования.

Introduction

Introduction. Medical conferences are a key source of new and relevant knowledge for practicing physicians. Physicians use social media to share this knowledge with their colleagues. As a result, there is a lot of discussion on social media about the topics covered in the scientific presentations. This initiative has some educational value, which is being actively explored. The discussions around such posts make ideas, insights, opinions and experiences of peer-colleagues easily available. They also immediately raise awareness of new clinical research and scientific data.

Objective

Objective. We studied how often Russian physicians use available social networks (vrachirf.ru, doktornarabote.ru. vk.com) to share information from scientific conferences with their colleagues.

Materials and мethods

Materials and мethods. We searched for posts using keywords related to medical conferences and selected among the search results the entries whose authors, as physicians, disclosed selected elements of the content of scientific presentations.

Results

Results. We identified 65 entries over the past 4–12 months where physicians shared facts and ideas presented at scientific conferences. Entries posted on professional physicians’ social networks with access restricted to lay public generated vigorous meaningful discussions, unlike posts on the mainstream social network vk.com.

Conclusions

Conclusions. Doctors very rarely share on social media the facts and ideas presented at Russian scientific medical conferences. Physicians demonstrate significant interest in these posts and actively discuss them. Further study should reveal the educational potential of the described phenomenon and suggest the pathways to its effective utilization.

профессиональные социальные сетинаучное общениемедицинское образованиецифровые лидеры мненийсодержание научных докладовцифровое здравоохранениеprofessional social mediascience communicationmedical educationdigital opinion leaderscontent of scientific presentationsdigital healthcareReferencesPower B.J. How to use Twitter at a Scientific Conference. mSphere. 2022;7(3):e0012122. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00121-22.Power B.J. How to use Twitter at a Scientific Conference. mSphere. 2022;7(3):e0012122. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00121-22.Katz M.S., Utengen A., Anderson P.F., Thompson M.A., Attai D.J., Johnston C., Dizon D.S. Disease-Specific Hashtags for Online Communication About Cancer Care. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(3):392–394. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3960.Katz M.S., Utengen A., Anderson P.F., Thompson M.A., Attai D.J., Johnston C., Dizon D.S. Disease-Specific Hashtags for Online Communication About Cancer Care. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(3):392–394. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3960.McGuckin D.G. Live tweeting: a tool for learning and reflection. BMJ. 2016;354:i3975. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3975.McGuckin D.G. Live tweeting: a tool for learning and reflection. BMJ. 2016;354:i3975. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3975.Mihailidou A.S., McCall D., Hiremath S., Costello B., Tunuguntla A., Mihailidis H. Use of Social Media at Cardiovascular Congresses: Opportunities for Education and Dissemination. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X16666200206103328.Mihailidou A.S., McCall D., Hiremath S., Costello B., Tunuguntla A., Mihailidis H. Use of Social Media at Cardiovascular Congresses: Opportunities for Education and Dissemination. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X16666200206103328.Velin L., Lartigue J.W., Johnson S.A., Zorigtbaatar A., Kanmounye U.S., Truche P., Joseph M.N. Conference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC representation at global health conferences. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(1):e003455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003455.Velin L., Lartigue J.W., Johnson S.A., Zorigtbaatar A., Kanmounye U.S., Truche P., Joseph M.N. Conference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC representation at global health conferences. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(1):e003455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003455.Cohen D., Allen T.C., Balci S., Cagle P.T., Teruya-Feldstein J., Fine S.W. et al. #InSituPathologists: how the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the united states and Canadian academy of pathology. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/odpathol.2016.223.Cohen D., Allen T.C., Balci S., Cagle P.T., Teruya-Feldstein J., Fine S.W. et al. #InSituPathologists: how the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the united states and Canadian academy of pathology. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/odpathol.2016.223.Leary M., McGovern S., Dainty K.N., Doshi A.A., Blewer A.L., Kurz M.C. et al. Examining the Use of a Social Media Campaign to Increase Engagement for the American Heart Association 2017 Resuscitation Science Symposium. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8):e008710. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008710.Leary M., McGovern S., Dainty K.N., Doshi A.A., Blewer A.L., Kurz M.C. et al. Examining the Use of a Social Media Campaign to Increase Engagement for the American Heart Association 2017 Resuscitation Science Symposium. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8):e008710. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008710.Carroll C.L., Dangayach N.S., Khan R., Carlos W.G., Harwayne-Gidansky I., Grewal H.S. et al. Lessons Learned From Web- and Social Media-Based Educational Initiatives by Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Societies. Chest. 2019;155(4):671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.12.009.Carroll C.L., Dangayach N.S., Khan R., Carlos W.G., Harwayne-Gidansky I., Grewal H.S. et al. Lessons Learned From Web- and Social Media-Based Educational Initiatives by Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Societies. Chest. 2019;155(4):671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.12.009.Carroll C.L., Kaul V., Dangayach N.S., Szakmany T., Winter G., Khateeb D. et al. Comparing the Digital Footprint of Pulmonary and Critical Care Conferences on Twitter. ATS Sch. 2021;2(3):432–441. https://doi.org/10.34197/atsscholar.2021-0041OC.Carroll C.L., Kaul V., Dangayach N.S., Szakmany T., Winter G., Khateeb D. et al. Comparing the Digital Footprint of Pulmonary and Critical Care Conferences on Twitter. ATS Sch. 2021;2(3):432–441. https://doi.org/10.34197/atsscholar.2021-0041OC.Lavorgna L., Brigo F., Moccia M., Leocani L., Lanzillo R., Clerico M. et al. e-Health and multiple sclerosis: An update. Mult Scler. 2018;24(13):1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518799629.Lavorgna L., Brigo F., Moccia M., Leocani L., Lanzillo R., Clerico M. et al. e-Health and multiple sclerosis: An update. Mult Scler. 2018;24(13):1657–1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518799629.Mishori R., Levy B., Donvan B. Twitter use at a family medicine conference: analyzing #STFM13. Fam Med. 2014;46:608–614. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25163039.Mishori R., Levy B., Donvan B. Twitter use at a family medicine conference: analyzing #STFM13. Fam Med. 2014;46:608–614. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25163039.Attai D.J., Radford D.M., Cowher M.S. Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013–2016. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3418–3422. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x.Attai D.J., Radford D.M., Cowher M.S. Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013–2016. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3418–3422. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x.Chaudhry A., Glodé L.M., Gillman M., Miller R.S. Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(3):173–178. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2011.000483.Chaudhry A., Glodé L.M., Gillman M., Miller R.S. Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(3):173–178. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2011.000483.Carroll C.L., Szakmany T., Dangayach N.S., DePriest A., Duprey M.S., Kaul V. et al. Growth of the Digital Footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Congress: 2014–2020. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(11):e0252. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000252.Carroll C.L., Szakmany T., Dangayach N.S., DePriest A., Duprey M.S., Kaul V. et al. Growth of the Digital Footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Congress: 2014–2020. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(11):e0252. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000252.Søreide K., Mackenzie G., Polom K., Lorenzon L., Mohan H., Mayol J. Tweeting the meeting: Quantitative and qualitative twitter activity during the 38th ESSO conference. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(2):284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.020.Søreide K., Mackenzie G., Polom K., Lorenzon L., Mohan H., Mayol J. Tweeting the meeting: Quantitative and qualitative twitter activity during the 38th ESSO conference. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(2):284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.020.Christiansen S.M., Oetting T.A., Herz N.L., Law J.C., O’Brien C.P., Patel P.S. et al. Twitter at the 2014 and 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(8):1835–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.012.Christiansen S.M., Oetting T.A., Herz N.L., Law J.C., O’Brien C.P., Patel P.S. et al. Twitter at the 2014 and 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(8):1835–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.03.012.Mohammadi D. Conference organisers swimming against the tide of Twitter. BMJ. 2017;358:j3966. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3966.Mohammadi D. Conference organisers swimming against the tide of Twitter. BMJ. 2017;358:j3966. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3966.Chapman S.J., Mayol J., Brady R.R. Twitter can enhance the medical conference experience. BMJ. 2016;354:i3973. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3973.Chapman S.J., Mayol J., Brady R.R. Twitter can enhance the medical conference experience. BMJ. 2016;354:i3973. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3973.Razzano D., Ziemba Y.C., Booth A.L., Markwood P., Hanos C.T., Riddle N. Utilizing Social Media to Spread Knowledge: The Association of Pathology Chairs Experience at the 2018 Annual Meeting. Acad Pathol. 2020;7:2374289520901342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289520901342.Razzano D., Ziemba Y.C., Booth A.L., Markwood P., Hanos C.T., Riddle N. Utilizing Social Media to Spread Knowledge: The Association of Pathology Chairs Experience at the 2018 Annual Meeting. Acad Pathol. 2020;7:2374289520901342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289520901342.Groves T. Tweeting and rule breaking at conferences. BMJ. 2016;353:i3556. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3556.Groves T. Tweeting and rule breaking at conferences. BMJ. 2016;353:i3556. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3556.Light D., Pawlak M., de Beaux A., Brady R.R. Is sharing speaker’s slides from conference presentations on social media a breach of intellectual property or a delegate’s right? Depends who you ask. Int J Surg. 2018;58:22–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.08.010.Light D., Pawlak M., de Beaux A., Brady R.R. Is sharing speaker’s slides from conference presentations on social media a breach of intellectual property or a delegate’s right? Depends who you ask. Int J Surg. 2018;58:22–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.08.010.Vukušić Rukavina T., Viskić J., Machala Poplašen L., Relić D., Marelić M., Jokic D., Sedak K. Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):e25770. https://doi.org/10.2196/25770.Vukušić Rukavina T., Viskić J., Machala Poplašen L., Relić D., Marelić M., Jokic D., Sedak K. Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):e25770. https://doi.org/10.2196/25770.Ekins S., Perlstein E.O. Ten simple rules of live tweeting at scientific conferences. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(8):e1003789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003789.Ekins S., Perlstein E.O. Ten simple rules of live tweeting at scientific conferences. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(8):e1003789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003789.Grajales F.J. 3rd, Sheps S., Ho K., Novak-Lauscher H., Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e13. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2912.Grajales F.J. 3rd, Sheps S., Ho K., Novak-Lauscher H., Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e13. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2912.Ziemba Y.C., Razzano D., Allen T.C., Booth A.L., Anderson S.R., Champeaux A. et al. Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee. Acad Pathol. 20207:2374289520934019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289520934019.Ziemba Y.C., Razzano D., Allen T.C., Booth A.L., Anderson S.R., Champeaux A. et al. Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee. Acad Pathol. 20207:2374289520934019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289520934019.Parwani P., Choi A.D., Lopez-Mattei J., Raza S., Chen T., Narang A. et al. Understanding social media: Opportunities for cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(9):1089–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.044.Parwani P., Choi A.D., Lopez-Mattei J., Raza S., Chen T., Narang A. et al. Understanding social media: Opportunities for cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(9):1089–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.044.Parwani P., Alasnag M., Mamas M.A. Social Media for Cardiovascular Medicine: Real Reflections from Virtual Medium. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(2):116–117. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X1702210311093359.Parwani P., Alasnag M., Mamas M.A. Social Media for Cardiovascular Medicine: Real Reflections from Virtual Medium. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(2):116–117. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X1702210311093359.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.