Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Treatment of osteoporosis in patients who had low-energy fractures: challenges of diagnosis and commitment to pathogenetic treatment

https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-9-62-67

Abstract

Osteoporosis and its complications (low-energy fractures) are one of the significant health problems in many developed countries. Socio-economic costs aimed at the prevention and treatment of this disease are increasing every year due to the increased life expectancy of the population. Almost all drugs with an anti-fracture effect for the treatment of osteoporosis, which are used in the world,   are used in Russia. However, the incidence of fractures in the population is reduced insufficiently, which is due to not so much ineffective treatment as to low adherence to it. The article presents data of the observational study of 154 patients (4 men and 150 women, mean age 65 ± 7 years), who had osteoporotic fractures of four main localizations. Only 36% of the questioned persons started taking pathogenetic drugs. Patients with rheumatic diseases, which were followed up by a rheumatologist, received treatment statistically more often.  When analysing the reasons for the absence of pathogenetic therapy for osteoporosis, it turned out that no recommendations of a traumatologist, a therapist or general practitioner, who followed up patients after a fracture, were provided in 36% of cases.  Not a single patient had their repeated fracture risk estimated using FRAX probabilities, and only 12% of people were referred to densitometric examination. After consultation in a specialized osteoporosis center, the proportion of people who started taking anti-osteoporotic therapy increased almost 2 times.

About the Authors

O. V. Dobrovolskaya
Federal Agency for Research Organizations of Russia, V.A.Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, FGBNU
Russian Federation

Moscow



N. V. Demin
Federal Agency for Research Organizations of Russia, V.A.Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, FGBNU
Russian Federation

Moscow



A. Yu. Feklistov
Federal Agency for Research Organizations of Russia, V.A.Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, FGBNU
Russian Federation

Moscow



N. V. Toroptsova
Federal Agency for Research Organizations of Russia, V.A.Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, FGBNU
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int, 2013, 24(1): 23-57. doi: 10.1007/s00198-0122074-y.

2. Lesnyak OM, Ershova OB, Belova KYu., Gladkova EN, Sinitsyna OS, Ganert OA. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in the Russian Federation and the Russian FRAX® model. Osteoporoz i Osteopatii, 2014, 3: 3-8.

3. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos, 2013, 8: 136. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1.

4. Bakhtiyarova SA. Prospective study of thequality of life and socio-economic consequences of complicated osteoporosis. Extended abstract of dissertation of PhD in medicine. Moscow, 2009, 24 p.

5. Dobrovolskaya OV, Nikitinskaya OA, Toroptsova NV. Osteoporosis and its complications: adherence to treatment and prospects for its improvement. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya, 2011, 5 (3): 30-33. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2011-681.

6. Baranova IA, Belaya ZhE., Gasser RV, Griffith DF, Jentant GK, Dorofeykov VV, et al. Osteoporosis: a guide for doctors. Moscow, 2016. 464 p.

7. Siris ES, Selby PL, Saag KG, Borgström F, Herings RM, Silverman SL. Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe. Am J Med, 2009, 122(2 Suppl): S3-13. doi: 10.1016/j. amjmed.2008.12.002.

8. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, Barr CE, Arvesen JN, Abbott TA, Silverman S. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc, 2006 Aug, 81(8): 1013-22. doi: 10.4065/81.8.1013.

9. Gallagher AM, Rietbrock S, Olson M, van Staa TP. Fracture outcomes related to persistence and compliance with oral bisphosphonates. J Bone Miner Res, 2008 Oct, 23(10): 1569-75. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080510.

10. Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E, et al. Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int, 2003 Dec, 14(12): 965-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1502-4.

11. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J. Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas, 2004 Jul 15, 48(3): 271-87. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.02.005.

12. Toroptsova NV, Dobrovolskaya OV. Prospective study of the quality of life of patients with osteoporosis after fractures of different localization. Spravochnik Vracha Obshhey Praktiki, 2016, 7: 27-37.

13. Baranova IA, Toroptsova NV, Lesnyak OM. The main provisions of the clinical guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid osteoporosis in men and women of 18 years and older. Osteoporoz i Osteopatii, 2014, 3: 34-7.

14. Modi A, Sen S, Adachi JD, Adami S, Cortet B, Cooper AL, Geusens P, Mellström D, Weaver J, van den Bergh J P, Nguyen AM, Sajjan S, MUSICOS Study Group. Gastrointestinal symptoms and association with medication use patterns, adherence, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, and resource use in osteoporosis: baseline results of the MUSIC-OS study. Osteoporos Int, 2016, 27: 1227-1238. doi: 10.1007/s00198-0153388-3.

15. Invernizzi M, Cisari C, Carda S. The potential impact of new effervescent alendronate formulation on compliance and persistence in osteoporosis treatment. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2015, 27: 107-113. doi: 10.1007/s40520-014-0256-5.

16. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Patient Information Leaflet for Binosto http: //www.grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2. aspx?routingGuid = 0cb40ac2-8e10-49af-a7610b86a19f5449&t= c056dcb6-a659-45ca-ba254b0d7033eaac.

17. Albert SG, Reddy S. Clinical Evaluation of Cost Efficacy of Drugs for Treatment of Osteoporosis. A Meta-analysis. Endocr Pract, 2017, 23(7): 841856. doi: 10.4158/EP161678.RA.


Review

For citations:


Dobrovolskaya OV, Demin NV, Feklistov AY, Toroptsova NV. Treatment of osteoporosis in patients who had low-energy fractures: challenges of diagnosis and commitment to pathogenetic treatment. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2018;(9):62-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-9-62-67

Views: 829


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)