Preview

Медицинский Совет

Расширенный поиск

Клинические и фармакоэкономические аспекты применения пролонгированных колониестимулирующих факторов

https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-22-112-118

Аннотация

Фебрильная нейтропения - одно из частых осложнений системной противоопухолевой терапии, характеризующееся высокими показателями смертности пациентов, летальность особенно высока у пациентов с предсуществующей сердечно-сосудистой патологией, заболеваниями почек, а также при наличии анемии. Кроме того, развитие фебрильной нейтропении ассоциировано со снижением дозовой интенсивности химиотерапии, что также оказывает неблагоприятное влияние на отдаленные результаты лечения пациентов при ряде злокачественных опухолей. Это диктует необходимость широкого применения профилактических мер, направленных на минимизацию риска ФН у онкологических пациентов, получающих цитотоксическую химиотерапию. Результатами многочисленных исследований доказано, что профилактическое применение гранулоцитарных колониестимулирующих факторов позволяет значительно снизить длительность глубокой нейтропении, частоту возникновения ФН и - наиболее важно - связанной с ней смертности. Данная статья посвящена обзору современных подходов к применению гранулоцитарных колониестимулирующих факторов (Г-КСФ) в контексте сложившейся на территории Российской Федерации системы финансирования онкологической помощи - клинико-статистических групп (КСГ). Подробно рассмотрены различные аспекты применения препаратов этого класса для предотвращения фебрильной нейтропении в контексте ее первичной и вторичной профилактики; правила применения Г-КСФ, современные данные об эффективности и целесообразности использования при различных клинических сценариях. Рассмотрены преимущества современных длительно действующих лекарственных форм Г-КСФ и их место в современной клинической практике.

Об авторе

А. А. Румянцев
Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии имени Н.Н. Блохина
Россия

Румянцев Алексей Александрович – кандидат медицинских наук, старший научный сотрудник онкологического отделения лекарственных методов лечения (химиотерапевтическое) №4 отдела лекарственного лечения Научно-исследовательского института клинической онкологии имени Н.Н. Трапезникова.

115478, Москва, Каширское шоссе, д. 24



Список литературы

1. Ranuhardy D. The Role of Febrile Neutropenia Guideline's Implementation on Mortality Rate in Dharmais Hospital-National Cancer Center. Indones J Cancer. 2019;12(3):71. https://doi.org/10.33371/ijoc.v12i3.612.

2. Sereeaphinan C., Kanchanasuwan S., Julamanee J. Mortality-associated clinical risk factors in patients with febrile neutropenia: A retrospective study. IJID Reg. 2021;1:5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2021.09.002.

3. Aagaard T., Reekie J., J0rgensen M., Roen A., Daugaard G., Specht L. et al. Mortality and admission to intensive care units after febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer. Cancer Med. 2020;9(9):3033-3042. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2955.

4. Clark O.A.C., Lyman G.H., Castro A.A., Clark L.G.O., Djulbegovic B. ColonyStimulating Factors for Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(18):4198-4214. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.645.

5. Hussaini S., Gupta A., Anderson K.E., Ballreich J.M., Nicholas L.H., Alexander C. Biosimilar uptake of filgrastim and impact on spending in Medicare Part D from 2015 to 2019. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(28 Suppl.):67-67. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2020.39.28_suppl.67.

6. Sternberg C.N., de Mulder P.H.M., Schornagel J.H., Theodore C., Fossa S.D., van Oosterom A.T. et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of High-Dose-Intensity Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (MVAC) Chemotherapy and Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Versus Classic MVAC in Advanced Urothelial Tract Tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol No. 30924. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(10):2638-2646. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2638.

7. Pfister C., Gravis G., Flechon A., Soulie M., Guy L., Laguerre B. et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of Dose-dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin, or Gemcitabine and Cisplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Analysis of the GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER Trial Secondary Endpoints: Chemotherapy Toxicity and Pathological Responses. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):214-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.024.

8. Lewis I.J., Nooij M.A., Whelan J., Sydes M.R., Grimer R., Hogendoorn P.C.W. et al. Improvement in Histologic Response But Not Survival in Osteosarcoma Patients Treated With Intensified Chemotherapy: A Randomized Phase III Trial of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(2):112-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk015.

9. Grier H.E., Krailo M.D., Tarbell N.J., Link M.P., Fryer C.J.H., Pritchard D.J. et al. Addition of Ifosfamide and Etoposide to Standard Chemotherapy for Ewing's Sarcoma and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of Bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):694-701. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020890.

10. Womer R.B., West D.C., Krailo M.D., Dickman P.S., Pawel B.R., Grier H.E. et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Interval-Compressed Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Ewing Sarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(33):4148-4154. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.41.5703.

11. Citron M.L., Berry D.A., Cirrincione C., Hudis C., Winer E.P., Gradishar W.J. et al. Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense Versus Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential Versus Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment of Node-Positive Primary Breast Cancer: First Report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1431-1439. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081.

12. Kosaka Y., Rai Y., Masuda N., Takano T., Saeki T., Nakamura S. et al. Phase III placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of pegfilgrastim to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(4):1137-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2597-1.

13. Gilbar P., McPherson I., Sorour N., Sanmugarajah J. High incidence of febrile neutropenia following adjuvant breast chemotherapy with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab. Breast Cancer Manag. 2014;3(4):327-333. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmt.14.22.

14. Kondagunta G.V., Bacik J., Donadio A., Bajorin D., Marion S., Sheinfeld J. et al. Combination of Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Is an Effective Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Relapsed Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(27):6549-6555. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.19.638.

15. Daugaard G., Skoneczna I., Aass N., De Wit R., De Santis M., Dumez H. et al. A randomized phase III study comparing standard dose BEP with sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus stem-cell support in males with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer. An intergroup study of EORTC, GTCSG, and Grupo Germinal (EORTC 30974). Ann Oncol. 2011;22(5):1054-1061. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq575.

16. Miller K.D., Loehrer P.J., Gonin R., Einhorn L.H. Salvage chemotherapy with vinblastine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in recurrent seminoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(4):1427-1431. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1427.

17. de Wit R., Skoneczna I., Daugaard G., De Santis M., Garin A., Aass N. et al. Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Paclitaxel-Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin (BEP) to Standard BEP in Intermediate-Prognosis Germ-Cell Cancer: Intergroup Study EORTC 30983. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):792-799. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.37.0171.

18. Swisher E.M., Mutch D.G., Rader J.S., Elbendary A., Herzog T.J. Topotecan in Platinum- and Paclitaxel-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;66(3):480-486. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1997.4787.

19. von Pawel J., Schiller J.H., Shepherd F.A., Fields S.Z., Kleisbauer J.P., Chrysson N.G. et al. Topotecan Versus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Vincristine for the Treatment of Recurrent Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(2):658-658. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.658.

20. Seddon B., Strauss S.J., Whelan J., Leahy M., Woll P.J., Cowie F. et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1397-1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30622-8.

21. Judson I., Verweij J., Gelderblom H., Hartmann J.T., Schoffski P., Blay J.-Y. et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):415-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70063-4.

22. Patel S.R., Vadhan-Raj S., Papadopolous N., Plager C., Burgess M.A., Hays C. et al. High-dose ifosfamide in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: results of phase II and pilot studies--dose-response and schedule dependence. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(6):2378-2384. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2378.

23. McCabe M., Kirton L., Khan M., Fenwick N., Strauss S.J., Valverde C. et al. Phase III assessment of topotecan and cyclophosphamide and high-dose ifosfamide in rEECur: An international randomized controlled trial of chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent and primary refractory Ewing sarcoma (RR-ES). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(17 Suppl.):LBA2-LBA2. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA2.

24. Oudard S., Fizazi K., Sengel0v L., Daugaard G., Saad F., Hansen S. et al. Cabazitaxel Versus Docetaxel As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial - FIRSTANA. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(28):3189-3197. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1068.

25. Tannock I.F., Horti J., Oudard S., James N.D., Rosenthal M.A. Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1502-1512. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040720.

26. Sweeney C.J., Chen Y.-H., Carducci M., Liu G., Jarrard D.F., Eisenberger M. et al. Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):737-746. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1503747.

27. Borghaei H., Paz-Ares L., Horn L., Spigel D.R., Steins M., Ready N.E. et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627-1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1507643.

28. Hanna N., Shepherd F.A., Fossella F.V., Pereira J.R., De Marinis F., von Pawel J. et al. Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1589-1597. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163.

29. Rose P.G., Blessing J.A., Ball H.G., Hoffman J., Warshal D., DeGeest K. et al. A phase II study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(2):130-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(02)00091-4.

30. Iorio G.C., Spieler B.O., Ricardi U., Dal Pra A. The Impact of Pelvic Nodal Radiotherapy on Hematologic Toxicity: A Systematic Review with Focus on Leukopenia, Lymphopenia and Future Perspectives in Prostate Cancer Treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;168:103497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103497.

31. Bonadonna G., Brusamolino E., Valagussa P., Rossi A., Brugnatelli L., Brambilla C. et al. Combination Chemotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 1976;294(8):405-410. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197602192940801.

32. Bonadonna G., Valagussa P. Dose-Response Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 1981;304(1):10-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198101013040103.

33. Loibl S., Skacel T., Nekljudova V., Luck HJ., Schwenkglenks M., Brodowicz T. et al. Evaluating the impact of Relative Total Dose Intensity (RTDI) on patients' short and long-term outcome in taxane- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer- a pooled analysis. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-131.

34. Denduluri N., Lyman G.H., Wang Y., Morrow P.K., Barron R., Patt D. et al. Chemotherapy Dose Intensity and Overall Survival Among Patients With Advanced Breast or Ovarian Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(5):380-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2018.02.003.

35. Fedyanin M., Tryakin A., Titov D., Zakharova T., Fainstein I., Figurin K. et al. Importance of maintenance of dose intensity (DI) during induction chemotherapy (iCT) for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(15 Suppl.):e16063-e16063. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e16063.

36. Crawford J., Denduluri N., Patt D., Jiao X., Morrow P.K., Garcia J. et al. Relative dose intensity of first-line chemotherapy and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(2):925-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04875-1.

37. Lee J., Kim J.W., Ahn S., Kim H.W., Lee J., Kim Y.H. et al. Optimal dose reduction of FOLFIRINOX for preserving tumour response in advanced pancreatic cancer: Using cumulative relative dose intensity. Eur J Cancer. 2017;76:125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.010.

38. Kobayashi S., Ueno M., Omae K., Kuramochi H., Terao M., Mizuno N. et al. Influence of initial dose intensity on efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2019;10(19):1775-1784. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26633.

39. Gray R., Bradley R., Braybrooke J., Liu Z., Peto R., Davies L. et al. Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2019;393(10179):1440-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33137-4.

40. Ding Y., Ding K., Yang H., He X., Mo W., Ding X. Does dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy have clinically significant prognostic value in breast cancer?: A meta-analysis of 3,724 patients. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0234058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234058.

41. Cash T., Krailo M.D., Buxton A., Pawel B., Healey J.H., Binitie O. et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma treated with interval-compressed chemotherapy: A long-term follow-up report from Children's Oncology Group study AEWS0031. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16 Suppl.):11505-11505. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.11505.

42. Zhou M., Thompson T.D., Lin H.-Y., Chen V.W., Karlitz J.J., Fontham E.T.H. et al. Impact of Relative Dose Intensity of FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Risk of Death Among Stage III Colon Cancer Patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022;21(2):e62-e75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2021.09.008.

43. Lakkunarajah S., Breadner D.A., Zhang H., Yamanaka E., Warner A., Welch S. The Influence of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Dose Intensity on Five-Year Outcomes in Resected Colon Cancer: A Single Centre Retrospective Analysis. Curr Oncol. 2021;28(5):4031-4041. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28050342.

44. Lyman G.H., Dale D.C., Wolff D.A., Culakova E., Poniewierski M.S., Kuderer N.M. et al. Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials of Cancer Chemotherapy With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Systematic Review. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(17):2914-2924. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8723.

45. Nielson C.M., Bylsma L.C., Fryzek J.P., Saad H.A., Crawford J. Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2021;26(9):e1609-e1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/onco.13822.

46. Dale D.C. The discovery, development and clinical applications of granulocyte colony- stimulating factor. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1998;109:27-36. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9601125.

47. Сакаева Д.Д., Борисов К.Е., Булавина И.С., Когония Л.М., Курмуков И.А., Орлова Р.В. и др. Практические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению фебрильной нейтропении. Злокачественные опухоли. 2021;11(2):55-63. https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2021-11-3s2-39.

48. Трякин А.А., Бесова Н.С., Волков Н.М., Гладков О.А., Карасева В.В., Сакаева Д.Д. и др. Практические рекомендации по общим принципам проведения противоопухолевой лекарственной терапии. Злокачественные опухоли. 2021;11(1):23-35. https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2021-11-3s2-01.

49. Clemons M., Fergusson D., Simos D., Mates M., Robinson A., Califaretti N. et al. A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF (filgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(7):951-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.005.

50. Wang Y., Chen L., Liu F., Zhao N., Xu L., Fu B. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51982-4.

51. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12(11):2471-2508. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1994.12.11.2471.

52. Truong J., Lee E.K., Trudeau M.E., Chan K.K.W. Interpreting febrile neutropenia rates from randomized, controlled trials for consideration of primary prophylaxis in the real world: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(4):608-618. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv619.

53. Scotte F., Simon H., Laplaige P., Antoine E.-C., Spasojevic C., Texier N. et al. Febrile neutropenia prophylaxis, G-CSF physician preferences: discretechoice experiment. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003082. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003082.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Румянцев АА. Клинические и фармакоэкономические аспекты применения пролонгированных колониестимулирующих факторов. Медицинский Совет. 2022;(22):112-118. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-22-112-118

For citation:


Rumyantsev AA. Clinical and pharmacoeconomic aspects of the use of prolonged colony-stimulating factors. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2022;(22):112-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-22-112-118

Просмотров: 353


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)