Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Glucosuria as a major mechanism-associated effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: Is there cause for concern?

https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-435

Abstract

Introduction. One of the main mechanisms of action of SGLT2 inhibitors is an increase in renal excretion of glucose and sodium, development of glucosuria against the background of decreased levels of daily glycemia. The frequency of glucosuria development in patients without DM/prediabetes, receiving SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of CHD or CKD, as a consequence of the mechanism of action of SGLT2 inhibitors inhibitors is poorly studied and seems to be very interesting.

Aim. To evaluate in real clinical practice the frequency of the development and severity of glucosuria in patients with CHF treated with inhibitors of SGLT2 inhibitors both on the background of concomitant DM2 and without type 2 DM.

Materials and methods. Within the framework of a one-stage, prospective, observational study we evaluated the frequency of development and severity of glucosuria in patients with CHF, receiving SGLT2 inhibitors inhibitors, who were in the cardiology department of V.P. Demikhov State Clinical Hospital of Moscow. A total of 230 patients were included in the analysis.

Results. The mean age of the patients was 74 [66; 83] years. Median LVEF was 36 [29; 44] %, NTproBNP 1019 [423; 2355] pg/ml. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was recorded in 64.81% of patients, 17.13% had HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction and 18.06% had a СHF preserved ejection fraction. DM2 was present in 38.7 percent of patients with СHF.  Among patients with CHF, the ‘glucosuria phenomenon’ due to the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors was observed in 31.16% of those without DM2, and in 52.27% of СHF patients with concomitant DM2.

Conclusion. In patients with CHF receiving SGLT2 inhibitors therapy, the ‘glucosuria phenomenon’ developed in one in three patients without overt carbohydrate metabolism abnormalities and one in two with DM2. The findings suggest that the glucosuria effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is not a required event even in patients with DM2, which may influence the incidence of adverse events in general clinical practice. And the cardioprotective benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors may be due to other mechanisms unrelated to glucose excretion, which, according to recent studies, is considered a surrogate predictor of favorable prognosis concerning CHF and renal outcomes. Nevertheless, additional clinical and experimental studies are required to determine the cardioprotective mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibitors and the predictive value of drug-induced glucosuria.

 

About the Authors

T. Yu. Demidova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Tatiana Yu. Demidova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997



M. Ya. Izmaylova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Maryam Ya. Izmaylova, Assistant of the Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997



References

1. Ndumele CE, Rangaswami J, Chow SL, Neeland IJ, Tuttle KR, Khan SS et al.; American Heart Association. Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;148(20):1606–1635. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001184.

2. Thomas G, Sehgal AR, Kashyap SR, Srinivas TR, Kirwan JP, Navaneethan SD. Metabolic syndrome and kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(10):2364–2373. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02180311.

3. Wu Y, Ding Y, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Risk factors contributing to type 2 diabetes and recent advances in the treatment and prevention. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(11):1185–1200. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.10001.

4. Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes – state-of-the-art. Mol Metab. 2021;46:101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102.

5. Khunti K, Jabbour S, Cos X, Mudaliar S, Mende C, Bonaca M, Fioretto P. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: Barriers and solutions for improving uptake in routine clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(7):1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14684.

6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S et al.; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–2128. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.

7. Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Erondu N, Shaw W et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(9):691–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30141-4.

8. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N et al.; CANVAS Program Collaborative Group. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–657. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1611925.

9. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B, Bompoint S, Heerspink HJL, Charytan DM et al.; CREDENCE Trial Investigators. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295–2306. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811744.

10. Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Kim D, Fralick M, Tong A, Patorno E. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):248–256. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989379/.

11. McMurray JJV, DeMets DL, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Langkilde AM et al.; DAPA-HF Committees and Investigators. A trial to evaluate the effect of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (DAPA-HF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(5):665–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1432.

12. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ et al. Effect of Empagliflozin on the Clinical Stability of Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Reduced Trial. Circulation. 2021;143(4):326–336. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834905/.

13. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bocchi E, Böhm M et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(16):1451–1461. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107038.

14. Peikert A, Martinez FA, Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Kulac IJ, Desai AS et al. Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction According to Age: The DELIVER Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2022;15(10):e010080. Available at: https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/259654593/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010080.pdf.

15. Bozkurt B, Ahmad T, Alexander KM, Baker WL, Bosak K, Breathett K et al. Writing Committee Members. Heart Failure Epidemiology and Outcomes Statistics: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail. 2023;29(10):1412–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.07.006.

16. Heidenreich P. Heart failure management guidelines: New recommendations and implementation. J Cardiol. 2024;83(2):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.10.009.

17. Adamo M, Chioncel O, Pagnesi M, Bayes-Genis A, Abdelhamid M, Anker SD et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of chronic right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(1):18–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3106.

18. Mascolo A, Di Napoli R, Balzano N, Cappetta D, Urbanek K, De Angelis A et al. Safety profile of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: A brief summary. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1010693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1010693.

19. Hummel CS, Lu C, Loo DD, Hirayama BA, Voss AA, Wright EM. Glucose transport by human renal Na+/D-glucose cotransporters SGLT1 and SGLT2. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300(1):C14–С21. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00388.2010.

20. Hirji I, Andersson SW, Guo Z, Hammar N, Gomez-Caminero A. Incidence of genital infection among patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK General Practice Research Database. J Diabetes Complications. 2012;26(6):501–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.06.012.

21. Alkabbani W, Zongo A, Minhas-Sandhu JK, Eurich DT, Shah BR, Alsabbagh MW, Gamble JM. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Urinary Tract Infections: A Propensity Score-matched Population-based Cohort Study. Can J Diabetes. 2022;46(4):392–403.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2021.12.005.

22. Komoroski B, Vachharajani N, Boulton D, Kornhauser D, Geraldes M, Li L, Pfister M. Dapagliflozin, a novel SGLT2 inhibitor, induces dose-dependent glucosuria in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(5):520–526. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2008.251.

23. Kasichayanula S, Chang M, Hasegawa M, Liu X, Yamahira N, LaCreta FP et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dapagliflozin, a novel selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2, in Japanese subjects without and with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(4):357–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01359.x.

24. Pozzi A, Cirelli C, Merlo A, Rea F, Scangiuzzi C, Tavano E et al. Adverse effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. 2024;29(1):207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-023-10363-w.

25. Wolf P, Fellinger P, Pfleger L, Beiglböck H, Krumpolec P, Barbieri C et al; Gluconeogenesis, But Not Glycogenolysis, Contributes to the Increase in Endogenous Glucose Production by SGLT-2 Inhibition. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(2):541–548. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1983.

26. Perepech NB, Mikhailova IE. Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors: successful running after two hares. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;26(2S):4534. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4534.

27. Hung CC, Lin HY, Lee JJ, Lim LM, Chiu YW, Chiang HP et al. Glycosuria and Renal Outcomes in Patients with Nondiabetic Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39372. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39372.

28. Gong S, Guo J, Han X, Li M, Zhou L, Cai X et al. Clinical and Genetic Features of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Glycosuria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(5):1548–1556. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2332.

29. Ferrannini E, Solini A, Baldi S, Scozzaro T, Polidori D, Natali A, Hansen MK. Role of Glycosuria in SGLT2 Inhibitor-Induced Cardiorenal Protection: A Mechanistic Analysis of the CREDENCE Trial. Diabetes. 2024;73(2):250–259. https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-0448.


Review

For citations:


Demidova TY, Izmaylova MY. Glucosuria as a major mechanism-associated effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: Is there cause for concern? Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2024;(16):172-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-435

Views: 164


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)