The inhalation therapy of moderate forms of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-6-84-88
Abstract
Epidemiological studies conducted throughout the world show that the inflammatory diseases of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are the leading cause of otorhinolaryngology (ENT) hospital admissions and outpatient clinic referral. Although the most common cause of acute rhinosinusitis is viral infection, antibiotics are prescribed in more than 80% of cases, which may lead to the development of antimicrobial resistance. The topical inhalation therapy with PARI SINUS device (сompressor Pari Sinus and Pari LC Sinus nebuliser) may provide better treatment options for patients who suffer from the diseases of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of topical inhalation treatment of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis using pulsating aerosol in comparison with systemic antibiotic therapy. Materials and methods. 60 adult patients at the age from 19 to 62 years with the diagnosis uncomplicated moderate acute bacterial rhinosinusitis has been included in opened randomized controlled trial. 30 patients have been treated with nasal nebulizer inhalation with N-acetyl-cysteine in combination with thiamphenicol on 500 mg once daily for 7 days using pulsating aerosol. Pulsating aerosol was obtained by PARI SINUS device. Controls - 30 patients have been treated with antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis using 875/125 mg oral amoxicillin/clavulanate twice daily for 7 days. The result was evaluated by the dynamics of the symptoms of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (nasal congestion, blockage, facial pain and reduction of smell), active anterior rhinomanometry and nasal endoscopy. Results. For main symptoms of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis was no significant benefit of antibiotic therapy as compared to topical inhalation therapy using pulsating aerosol. Both treatment options were effective against acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, which is confirmed by the improvement of symptoms, active anterior rhinomanometry and nasal endoscopy. Conclusion. The topical nebulizer therapy of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis may provide better treatment options, because systemic antibiotics can be associated with different adverse effects.
About the Authors
I. B. AngotoevaRussian Federation
PhD in medicine
D. S. Pshennikov
Russian Federation
References
1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusiyis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology, 2012, 50(1): 1–12. doi: 10.4193/ Rhino50E2.
2. Minzdravsots razvitiya Rossii. Zabolevaemost’ naseleniya Rossii v 2007 g. Statisticheskie dannye. Chast’ I. 2008.
3. Abdulkerimov Kh.T., Garashchenko T.I., Koshel’ V.I., Ryazantsev S.V., Svistushkin V.M. Printsipy etiopatogeneticheskoi terapii ostrykh sinusitov: metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Pod red. S.V. Ryazan tseva. SPb.: Poliforum Grupp, 2014. (In Russ.).
4. Savvateeva D.M., Svistushkin V.M. Current trends in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis. RMJ. Оtorhinolaryngology, 2016, 4: 251–254.
5. Anon JB, Jacobs MR, Poole MD, Ambrose PG, Benninger MS, Hadley JA, Craig WA. Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004 Jun, 130(6): 794-6. doi: 10.1016/j. otohns.2003.12.003
6. Gill JM, Fleischut P, Haas S, Pellini B, Crawford A, Nash DB. Use of antibiotics for adult upper respiratory infections in outpatient settings: a national ambulatory network study. Family medicin, 2006, 38: 349-354.
7. Nosulia E.V. Antibiotics in the combination therapy of bacterial rhinosinusitis: Possibilities and limitations. Rossiiskaya rinologiya. 2014, 22(3): 36-40.
8. Hochhaus G. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of mometasone furoate nasal spray: potential effects on clinical safety and efficacy. Clin Ther, 2008, 30: 1-13.
9. Möller W, Schuschnig U, Meyer G, Mentzel H, Keller M. Ventilation and drug delivery to the par-anasal sinuses: studies in a nasal cast using pulsating airflow. Rhinology, 2008, 46(3): 213–220.
10. Boe J, Dennis JH. European Respiratory Society Nebulizer Guidelines: Technical Aspects. Eur Respir Rev. 2000, 72(10): 1-237.
11. Pshennikov D.S., Angotoeva I.B. The prospects for inhalation therapy of rhinosinusitis. Eruditio Juvenium. 2017, 2: 277-282. doi: 10.23888/ HMJ20172277-282.
12. Dennis JH. A review of issues relating to nebulizer standards. J Aerosol Med, 1998, 11 Suppl 1: S73–79.
13. Möller W, Schuschnig U, Celik G, Münzing W, Bartenstein P et al. Topical drug delivery in chronic rhinosinusitis patients before and after sinus surgery using pulsating aerosols. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(9): e74991. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0074991. http: //journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074991. Ссылка активна на 4.12.16.
14. Kolosova N.G., Dronov I.A. Topical inhalation antibacterial therapy of respiratory infections in children. RMJ, 2017, 5: 319–321.
15. Mazzei T. Thiamphenicol: pharmacokinetic and safety considerations. GIMMOC, 2000, 4: 15–19.
16. Racional’naja anti-mikrobnaja farmakoterapija. Rukovodstvo dlja praktikujushhih vrachej. Pod red. Jakovleva V.P., Jakovleva S.V. M.: Litterra, 2003. 1008 s.
17. Chuchalin A.G., Soodaeva S.K., Avdeev S.N. Fluimucil: mehanizmy dejstvija i znachenie v terapii zabolevanij organov dyhanija. M.: Zambon Group S.P.A, 2004 (in Russian)
18. Dinicola S., De Grazia S., Carlomagno G., Pintucci J.P. N-acetylcysteine as powerful molecule to destroy bacterial biofilms. A systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014, 18(19): 2942–2948.
19. Aslam S, Darouiche RO. Role of antibiofilm-antimicrobial agents in controlling device-related infections. Int J Artif Organs, 2011, 34 (9): 752–758
Review
For citations:
Angotoeva IB, Pshennikov DS. The inhalation therapy of moderate forms of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2018;(6):84-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-6-84-88