Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Intrauterine sinechia: features of surgical treatment and prevention of recurrence

https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-7-146-151

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issues of surgical treatment and prevention of recurrence of intrauterine sinechia (IUS) and its severe condition Asherman syndrome. The topicality of the IUS is characterized by a high incidence of infertility, common miscarriage, amenorrhea and hypomenstrual syndrome. The article describes the principles for management of patients with IUS, the features of surgical treatment and the prevention of recurrence of the disease. The authors present their own clinical data summarizing the experience in treating 64 women with IUS. All patients underwent a hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. In the postoperative period, 48 women (group 1) received an adhesion barrier based on hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose – Antiadhesin injected into the cavity of the uterus. 16 women (control group 2) did not receive Antiadgesin. The study showed that significantly fewer relapses and a significant increase in commenced pregnancy were detected among patients in group 1. As can be seen from the above, not only the careful and complete dissection of the adhesions, but also the active postoperative rehabilitation period, which includes the prevention of relapsing adhesiogenesis using intrauterine injections of adhesion barriers, is crucial for the comprehensive treatment of patients with IUS.

About the Authors

T. A. Makarenko
Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
MD


D. E. Nikiforova
Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation


I. O. Ulyanova
Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
PhD in medicine


References

1. Asherman J.G. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire, 1950, 57(6): 892–896.

2. Panayiotides I, Weyers S, Bosteels J, Van Herendae B. Intrauterine adhesion (IUA): Has there been progress in understanding and treatment over last 20 years? Gynecol Surg, 2009, 6: 197–211.

3. March CM. Managemen to Asherman’s syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online, 2011, 23: 63–76.

4. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome-one century later. Fertil Steril, 2008, 89: 759–779.

5. Panayiotides I, Weyers S, Bosteels J, Van Herendae B. Intrauterine adhesion (IUA): Has there been progress in understanding and treatment over last 20 years? Gynecol Surg, 2009, 6: 197–211.

6. Van Herendael BJ. Treatment of intra-uterine adhesions. Invited presentations and presentations by organisations and societies. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2012, 119S3: 161-260.

7. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC: Asherman syndrome-one century later. Fertil Steril, 2008, 89: 759–779.

8. Novikova PV. Therapeutic potential of stem cells of various origins in Asherman syndrome therapy in the experiment. Zhurnal Akusherstva i Zhenskikh Bolezney, Special Issue, 2017, LXVI, National Congress Discussion Issues of Modern Obstetrics, June 15-17, 2017: 132-133.

9. Popov AA, Mannnikova TN, Aliyeva AS, Fedorov AA, Bespalova AG. Intrauterine sinechia: a century later. RMJ, 2017, 12: 895-899.

10. Davydov AI, Strizhakov AN, Novruzova NKh. Complications of operative hysteroscopy: prevention and treatment. Voprosy Ginekologii, Akusherstva i Perinatologii, 2016, 15 (6): 52-60.

11. Takai IU, Kwayabura AS, Ugwa EA, Idrissa A, Obed JY, Bukar MA. 10-year review of the clinical presentation and treatment outcome of Asherman’s syndrome at a center with limited resources. Ann Med Health Sci Res, 2015, 5(6): 442-446.

12. Ibrahim MI, Raafat TA, Ellaithy MI, Aly RT. Risk of postpartum uterine synechiae following uterine compression suturing during postpartum haemorrhage. Aust N Z J ObstetGynaecol, 2013, 53(1): 37-45.

13. Renier D, Bellato P, Bellini D et al. Pharmacokinetic behavior of ACP gel, an autocrosslinkedhyaluronan derivative, after intraperitoneal administration. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(26): 53-68.

14. Pellicano M, Guida M, Zullo F et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginiscopie hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. FertilSteril, 2003, 79: 418-421.

15. Stefanescu A, Marinescu B. Diagnostic hysteroscopy – a retrospective study of 1545 cases. Maedica (Buchar), 2012, 7(4): 309-314.

16. Conforti A, Alviggi C, Mollo A, De Placido G, Magos A. The management of Asherman syndrome: a review of literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2013, 27(11): 118.

17. Panayotidis C, Weyers S. Intrauterine adhesions (IUA): has there been progress in understanding and treatment over the last 20 years? Gynecological surgery, 2009, 6(3): 197-211.

18. Jones K. Ambulatory gynaecology: a new concept in the deliveryof healthcare for women. Gynecological Surgery, 2006, 3(3): 153-156.

19. Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gyneocology; Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of intrauterine adhesions in China. Zhonghua Fu Chan KeZaZhi, 2015, 50(12): 881-887.

20. March CM. Intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 1995, 22: 491-505.

21. Amer MI, El Nadim A, Hassanein K. The role of intrauterine balloon after operative hysteroscopy in the prevention of intrauterine adhesion:a prospective controlled study. MEFS J, 2005, 10: 125-129.

22. Di SpiezioSardo A., Calagna G., Scognamiglio M., O’Donovan P, Campo R, De Wilde RL. Prevention of intrauterine post-surgical adhesions in hysteroscopy. A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016, 203: 182-192.

23. Metwally M, Watson A, Lilford R, Vandekerckhove P: Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006, 19: CD001298.

24. Mais V, Cirronis MG, Peiretti M, Ferrucci G, Cossu E, Melis GB. Efficacy of autocrosslinkedhyaluronan gel for adhesion prevention in laparoscopy and hysteroscopy:a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012, 160: 1-5.

25. The Use of Adhesion Prevention Agents in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RCOG. Scient Impact Paper, 2013, 39: 6.

26. AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines for Management of Intrauterine Synechiae. 2013: 8.

27. Справочник лекарств РЛС. Антиадгезин гель противоспаечный рассасывающийся стерильный. http://www.rlsnet.ru/pcr_tn_ id_81752.htm.

28. Wamsteker K, Blok SD. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and docu- mentation. In: Sutton C, Diamond M, editors. Endoscopic Surgery for Gynecologists. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1993.

29. Bassil S. Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 18(3): 258–263.

30. Preutthipan S, Linasmita V. Reproductive outcome following hystero- scopiclysis of intrauterine adhesions: a result of 65 cases at Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai, 2000, 83(1): 42–46.

31. March C, Israel R. Intrauterine adhesions secondary to elective abortion. Hysteroscopic diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol, 1976, 48(4): 422–429.


Review

For citations:


Makarenko TA, Nikiforova DE, Ulyanova IO. Intrauterine sinechia: features of surgical treatment and prevention of recurrence. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2018;(7):146-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-7-146-151

Views: 839


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)