High-resolution manometry in the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-3-104-110
Abstract
Esophageal high-resolution manometry is a modern method of diagnosis performed worldwide as the gold standard for assessing esophageal motility. The Chicago classification is applied to interpret the manometric findings. It provides a standardized approach to the analysis and classification of motility disorders, which facilitates a diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders and helps select a tactic for treatment. There are four major categories of motility disorders: 1. Disorders with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (types I, II, III achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction). 2. Major disorders of peristalsis (distal esophageal spasm, jackhammer esophagus, absent contractility). 3. Minor disorders of peristalsis (ineffective motility, fragmented peristalsis) 4. Normal esophageal motility. Only primary esophageal motility disorders are addressed in the Chicago Classification. Motility disorders of the upper esophageal sphincter, motility abnormalities after surgical esophagus interventions do not have classification criteria. However, in the future the Chicago classification is expected to be improved and expanded to cover these disorders.
About the Authors
E. V. Barkalova
A.I.Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Laboratory of Functional Methods of Diagnosis in Gastroenterology, Moscow
Russian Federation
Laboratory of Functional Methods of Diagnosis in Gastroenterology, Moscow
Yu. A. Kucheryavy
A.I.Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in medicine
Laboratory of Functional Methods of Diagnosis in Gastroenterology, Moscow
I. V. Maev
A.I.Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Prof.
Laboratory of Functional Methods of Diagnosis in Gastroenterology, Moscow
References
1. Clouse RE, Staiano A. Topography of the esophageal peristaltic pressure wave. Am J Physiol, 1991, 261(4 Pt 1): G677-84.
2. Gyawali CP. High resolution manometry: the Ray Clouse legacy. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2012, 24(Suppl 1): 2–4.
3. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut, 2008, 57(3): 405-23.
4. Rohof WOA and Bredenoord AJ. Chicago Classi fi-cation of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Les sons Learned. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2017, 19(8): 37.
5. Storonova OA, Trukhmanov AS. The method for studying the esophageal motility. Postgraduate educational textbook. Edited by Acad. of RAMS, Prof. V.T. Ivashkin. M. 2011: 36 p.
6. Kahrilas P, Bredenoord A, Fox M, Gyawali C, Roman S, Smout A, Pandolfino J. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 2015, 27: 160-174.
7. Ivashkin VT, Trukhmanov AS, Gog gello EA, at al. Russian Gastroenterological Asso ci ation guidelines on management of cardiac achalasia and cardio-spasm. RJGGK, 2016, 26 (4): 36-54
8. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, Bruley des Varannes S, Chaussade S, Costantini M et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(4): 718–25.
9. Francesco T, Alexandros I, Francesco A, Franco B. Treatment of achalasia in the era of high-resolution manometry. Ann Gastroenterol, 2015, 28(3): 301–308.
10. Zhang W, Linghu EQ. Peroral endoscopic myoto-my for type III achalasia of Chicago classification: outcomes with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(5): 785-791.
11. Van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2015, 27(9): 1310–6.
12. Perez-Fernandez MT, Santander C, Marinero A, BurgosSantamaria D, Chavarria-Herbozo C. Characterization and follow-up of esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2016, 28(1): 116–26.
13. Porter RF, Gyawali CP. Botulinum toxin injection in dysphagia syndromes with preserved esophageal peristalsis and incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2011, 23(2): 139–44.
14. Cattau EL Jr, Castell DO, Johnson DA, Spurling TJ, Hirszel R, Chobanian SJ et al. Diltiazem therapy for symptoms associated with nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol, 19981, 6(3): 272–6.
15. Orlando RC, Bozymski EM. Clinical and mano-metric effects of nitroglycerin in diffuse esophageal spasm. N Engl J Med, 1973, 289(1): 23–5.
16. Vanuytsel T, Bisschops R, Farre R, Pauwels A, Holvoet L, Arts J et al. Botulinum toxin reduces dysphagia in patients with nonachalasia primary esophageal motility disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 11(9): 1115–21.
17. Khan MA, Kumbhari V, Ngamruengphong S, Ismail A, Chen YI, Chavez YH et al. Is POEM the answer for management of spastic esophageal disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci, 2017, 62(1): 35–44.
18. Bechara R., Ikeda H., Inoue H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for Jackhammer esophagus: to cut or not to cut the lower esophageal sphincter. Endosc Int Open, 2016, 4(5): E585-8.
19. Goel R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Wilkinson M. A Jackhammer in the gullet: high amplitude oesophageal contractions as a cause of atypical chest pain. BMJ Case Rep, 2015, 5.
20. Yun S, Yang W, Rhee P. Two distinct types of hypercontractile esophagus: classic and spastic Jackhammer. Gut and Liver, 2016, 10(5): 859-863.
21. Maev IV, Barkalova EV, Ovsepyan MA, Kucheryavyy YuA, Andreev DN. Possibilities of pH-impedance measurement and high-resolution manometry in managing patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Terapevticheskiy Arkhiv, 2017, 89(2): 76-83
Review
For citations:
Barkalova EV, Kucheryavy YA, Maev IV. High-resolution manometry in the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2018;(3):104-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2018-3-104-110
Views:
789
Email this article 