Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Biofilms and сhronic rhinosinusitis

https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-6-59-65

Abstract

Introduction. A biofilm is a community of bacteria embedded in a matrix consisting of polysaccharides, nucleic acids, and proteins. Biofilms are resistant to antibiotics, antiseptics, and immune defense factors of the human body. Currently, the role of bacterial biofilms in the pathogenesis of chronic infections is known. There are a lot of articles confirming the detection of biofilms in diseases of the upper respiratory tract and ear: adenoiditis, recurrent and chronic otitis, laryngitis.

Biofilms and Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS). Biofilms can play a significant role in prolonging inflammation in the paranasal sinuses. Biofilms are found in 76.7% of patients with CRS. This fact can serve as one of the explanations for the refractoriness of drug therapy and recurrent inflammations after surgical treatment.

Methods for Controlling Biofilms. Is there a Way Out? As part of the strategy of removing biofilm, it is important to destroy its structure to planktonic forms, which will allow for the process of managing CRS progress. Antibiotic therapy alone is considered insufficient. Nasal irrigation can provide a violation of the biofilm integrity due to the mechanical destruction of its matrix and have a significant impact on the outcome of the disease. The nasal irrigation preparation containing isotonic sea water solution added with carbon dioxide (CO2-0.4%) has such an effect. In an experimental study, it was shown that 98% of the bacteria were non-viable when processing Staphylococus aureus biofilm.

Conclusion. The impact on biofilms should be complex, including medication, physical means, irrigation of the nasal cavity.

About the Author

V. V. Shilenkova
Yaroslavl State Medical University
Russian Federation

Viktoria V. Shilenkova, Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Department of ENT Diseases

5, Revolyutsionnaya St., Yaroslavl, 150000

 



References

1. Vestby L.K., Grønseth T., Simm R., Nesse L.L. Bacterial Biofilm and its Role in the Pathogenesis of Disease. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(2):E59. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020059.

2. Bjarnsholt T. The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. APMIS. 2013;121(s136):1–58. doi: 10.1111/apm.12099.

3. Shvarts T.A. Biofilm as a microbial community. Vestnik Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kurgan State University. 2015;1(7):41–44. (In Russ.) Available at: http://vestnik.kgsu.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/%E2%84%961-35-2015.pdf.

4. Donlan R.M., Costerton J.W. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2):167–193. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002.

5. Mena Viveros N. Biofilms in otolaryngology. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2014;65(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2012.08.005.

6. Donne J., Dewilde S. The challenging world of biofilm physiology. Adv Microb Physiol. 2015;67:235–292. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2015.09.003.

7. Belas R. Biofilms, flagella, and mechanosensing of surfaces by bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(9):517–527. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.002.

8. Donlan R.M. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2002;8(9):881–890. doi: 10.3201/eid0809.020063.

9. Rezzonico F., Smits T.H., Duffy B. Detection of AI-2 receptors in genomes of Enterobacteriaceae suggests a role of type-2 quorum sensing in closed ecosystems. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(5):6645–6665. doi: 10.3390/s120506645.

10. Kendall M.M., Rasko D.A., Sperandio V. Global effects of the cell-to-cell signaling molecules autoinducer-2, autoinducer-3, andepinephrine in a luxS mutant of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2007;75(10):4875–4884. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00550-07.

11. Romeo T. When the party is over: a signal for dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(21):7325–7327. doi: 10.1128/JB.01317-06.

12. Boyd C.D., O’Toole G.A. Second messenger regulation of biofilm formation: breakthroughs in understanding c-di-GMP effector systems. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:439–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155705.

13. Ramakrishnan Y., Shields R.C., Elbadawey M.R., Wilson J.A. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: what is new and where next? J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(8):744–751. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115001620.

14. Rocco C.J., Davey M.E., Bakaletz L.O., Goodman S.D. Natural antigenic differences in the functionally equivalent extracellular DNABII proteins of bacterial biofilms provide a means for targeted biofilm therapeutics. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2017;32(2):118–130. doi: 10.1111/omi.12157.

15. Hall-Stoodley L., Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell. Microbiol. 2009;11(7):1034–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01323.x.

16. Moser C., Pedersen H.T., Lerche C.J., Kolpen M., Line L., Thomsen K. et al. Biofilms and host response – helpful or harmful. APMIS. 2017;125(4):320– 338. doi: 10.1111/apm.12674.

17. Kinnari T.J. The role of biofilm in chronic laryngitis and in head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23(6):448–453. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000200.

18. Kania R., Vironneau P., Dang H., Bercot B., Cambau E., Verillaud B. et al. Bacterial biofilm in adenoids of children with chronic otitis media. Part I: a case control study of prevalence of biofilms in adenoids, risk factors and middle ear biofilms. Acta Oto­Laryngologica. 2019;139(4):345–350. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1571282.

19. Galli J., Calo L., Giuliani M., Sergi B., Lucidi D., Meucci D. et al. Biofilm’s role in chronic cholesteatomatous otitis media: A pilot study. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(5):914–916. doi: 10.1177/0194599816630548.

20. Gu X., Keyoumu Y., Long L., Zhang H. Detection of bacterial biofilms in different types of chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(11):2877–2883. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2766-8.

21. Lampikoski H., Aarnisalo A.A., Jero J., Kinnari T.J. Mastoid Biofilm in Chronic Otitis Media. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(5):785–788. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259533f.

22. Saunders J., Murray M., Alleman A. Biofilms in chronic suppurative otitis media and cholesteatoma: Scanning electron microscopy findings. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011;32(1):32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2009.09.010.

23. Fokkens W.J., Lund V.J., Mullol J., Bachert C., Alobid I., Baroody F. et al. EPOS 2012: European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. A Summary for Otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2012;50(1):1–12. doi: 10.4193/Rhino50E2.

24. Fastenberg J.H., Hsueh W.D., Mustafa A., Akbar N.A., Abuzeid W.M. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2(4):219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.03.002.

25. Danielsen K.A., Eksland O., Fridrich-Aas K., Orszagh V.C., BachmannHarildstad G., Burum-Auensen E. Bacterial biofilms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: A confocal scanning laser microscopy study. Rhinology. 2014;52(2):150–155. doi: 10.4193/Rhin13.053.

26. Wood A.J., Fraser J., Swift S., Amirapu S., Douglas R.G. Are biofilms associated with an inflammatory response in chronic rhinosinusitis? Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(5):335–339. doi: 10.1002/alr.20060.

27. Tan N.C., Foreman A., Jardeleza C., Douglas R., Vreugde S., Wormald P.J. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: The Trojan horse of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis? Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(4):261–266. doi: 10.1002/alr.21154.

28. Glowacki R., Tomaszewski K.A., Strek P., Tomaszewska I.M., Zgorska-Swierzy K., Markiewicz B., Skladzien J. The influence of bacterial biofilm on the clinical outcome of chronic rhinosinusitis: A prospective, double-blind, scanning electron microscopy study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(5):1015–1021. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2635-5.

29. Boase S., Foreman A., Cleland E., Tan L., Melton-Kreft R., Pant H. et al. The microbiome of chronic rhinosinusitis: culture, molecular diagnostics and biofilm detection. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-210.

30. Maina I.W., Patel N.N., Cohen N.A. Understanding the Role of Biofilms and Superantigens in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2018;6:253–262. doi: 10.1007/s40136-018-0212-6.

31. Foreman A., Boase S., Psaltis A., Wormald P.J. Role of Bacterial and Fungal Biofilms in Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012;12(2):127–135. doi: 10.1007/s11882-012-0246-7.

32. Boase S., Jervis-Bardy J., Cleland E., Pant H., Tan L., Wormald P.J. Bacterialinduced epithelial damage promotes fungal biofilm formation in a sheep model of sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(5):341–348. doi: 10.1002/alr.21138.

33. Danielsen K.A., Eksland O., Fridrich-Aas K., Orszagh V.C., BachmannHarildstad G., Burum-Auensen E. Bacterial biofilms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: A confocal scanning laser microscopy study. Rhinology. 2014;52(2):150–155. doi: 10.4193/Rhin13.053.

34. Ramakrishnan Y., Shields R.C., Elbadawey M.R., Wilson A.J. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: What is new and where next? J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129(8):744–751. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115001620.

35. Wu D., Bleier B.S., Wei Y. Current Understanding of the Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:415. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00415.

36. Dlugaszewska J., Leszczynska M., Lenkowski M., Tatarska A., Pastusiak T., Szyfter W. The pathophysiological role of bacterial biofilms in chronic sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(8):1989–1994. doi: 10.1007/ s00405-015-3650-5.

37. Psaltis A.J., Weitzel E.K., Ha K.R., Wormald P.J. The effect of bacterial biofilms on post-sinus surgical outcomes. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(1):1–6. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3119.

38. Klodzińska S.N., Priemel P.A., Rades T., Mørck Nielsen H. Inhalable Antimicrobials for Treatment of Bacterial Biofilm-Associated Sinusitis in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Challenges and Drug Delivery Approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(10):1688. doi: 10.3390/ijms17101688.

39. Foreman A., Psaltis A.J., Tan L.W., Wormald P.-J. Characterization of bacterial and fungal biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(6):556–561. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3413.

40. Suh J.D., Cohen N.A., Palmer J.N. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;18(1):27–31. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328334f670.

41. Pynnonen M.A., Venkatraman G., Davis G.E. Macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148(3):366–373. doi: 10.1177/0194599812470427.

42. Cervin A., Wallwork B. Efficacy and safety of long-term antibiotics (macrolides) for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014;14(3):416. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0416-2.

43. Schleimer R.P. Glucocorticoids suppress inflammation but spare innate immune responses in airway epithelium. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1(3):222–230. doi: 10.1513/pats.200402-018MS.

44. Adappa N.D., Wei C.C., Palmer J.N. Nasal irrigation with or without drugs: the evidence. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(1):53–57. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834dfa80.

45. Wei C.C., Adappa N.D., Cohen N.A. Use of topical nasal therapies in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(10):2347– 2359. doi: 10.1002/lary.24066.

46. Biel M.A., Jones JW., Pedigo L., Gibbs A., Loebel N. The effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on human ciliated respiratory mucosa. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(12):2628–2631. doi: 10.1002/lary.23502.

47. Biel M.A., Pedigo L., Gibbs A., Loebel N. Photodynamic therapy of antibiotic-resistant biofilms in a maxillary sinus model. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(6):468–473. doi: 10.1002/alr.21134.

48. Biel M.A. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for treatment of biofilmbased infections. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;831:119–136. doi: 10.1007/9783-319-09782-4_8.

49. Turner J.H., Wu J., Dorminy C.A., Chandra R.K. Safety and tolerability of surfactant nasal irrigation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(8):809–812. doi: 10.1002/alr.21959.

50. Jervis-Bardy J., Boase S., Psaltis A., Foreman A., Wormald P.J. A randomized trial of mupirocin sinonasal rinses versus saline in surgically recalcitrant staphylococcal chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(10):2148– 2153. doi: 10.1002/lary.23486.

51. Singhal D., Jekle A., Debabov D., Wang L., Khosrovi B., Anderson M. et al. Efficacy of NVC-422 against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a sheep biofilm model of sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(4):309–315. doi: 10.1002/alr.21038.

52. Ha K.R., Psaltis A.J., Butcher A.R., Wormald P.J., Tan L.W. In vitro activity of mupirocin on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and its potential implications in chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(3):535–540. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815bf2e3.

53. Jain R., Douglas R. When and how should we treat biofilms in chronic sinusitis? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;22(1):16–21. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000010.

54. Vecellio L., De Gersem R., Le Guellec S., Reychler G., Pitance L., Le Pennec D. et al. Deposition of aerosols delivered by nasal route with jet and mesh nebulizers. Int J Pharm. 2011;407(1-2):87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.01.024.

55. Bruni M., Ryan L.E., Tabor M.H. Powered irrigation with suction evacuation for chronic rhinosinusitis in the office setting: A pilot study. Ear Nose Throat J. 2018;97(4-5):E27–E30. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29940690/

56. Isaacs S., Fakhri S., Luong A., Whited C., Citardi M.J. The effect of dilute baby shampoo on nasal mucociliary clearance in healthy subjects. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25(1):e27–e29. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3583.

57. Chiu A.G., Palmer J.N., Woodworth B.A., Doghramji L., Cohen M.B., Prince A., Cohen N.A. Baby shampoo nasal irrigations for the symptomatic post-functional endoscopic sinus surgery patient. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2008;22(1):34–37. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3122.

58. Farag A.A., Deal A.M., McKinney K.A., Thorp B.D., Senior B.A., Ebert C.S., Zanation A.M. Single-blind randomized controlled trial of surfactant vs hypertonic saline irrigation following endoscopic endonasal surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3(4):276–280. doi: 10.1002/alr.21116.

59. Jia M., Chen Z., Guo Y., Chen X., Zhao X. Efficacy of silk fibroin-nano silver against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a rabbit model of sinusitis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:2933–2939. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S130160.

60. Möller W., Schuschnig U., Celik G., Münzing W., Bartenstein P., Häussinger K. et al. Topic drug delivery in chronic rhinosinusitis before and after sinus surgery using pulsating aerosols. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074991.

61. Lim M., Citardi M.J., Leong J.L. Topical antimicrobials in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(4):381– 389. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3189.

62. Hoggard M., Wagner Mackenzie B., Jain R., Taylor M.W., Biswas K., Douglas R.G. Chronic Rhinosinusitis and the Evolving Understanding of Microbial Ecology in Chronic Inflammatory Mucosal Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(1):321–348. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00060-16.


Review

For citations:


Shilenkova VV. Biofilms and сhronic rhinosinusitis. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(6):59-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-6-59-65

Views: 1402


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)