Features of CO2-laser application in surgical treatment of chronic cicatrical stenoses of the larynx
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-6-108-113
Abstract
The aim of the review is to identify current possibilities of carbon dioxide laser application in microsurgical treatment of chronic laryngeal cicatricial stenoses. Currently, laser endolaryngeal surgeries are one of the main standards in surgical treatment of patients with this laryngeal pathology, including when providing high-tech assistance. Various types of lasers and methods of surgical treatment of the larynx are used. The choice of these methods is primarily determined by the opinion of the operating surgeon. The review highlights the principles of laser surgery in general, and when using carbon dioxide laser in particular. The use of micromanipulators makes it possible to combine the work of carbon dioxide laser with the operating microscope, affecting target tissues noninvasively with maximum precision. This technology makes it possible to expand the range of surgical manipulations in endolaryngeal surgeries. The main operating modes of the carbon dioxide laser, applicable for different clinical situations, such as power, impulse, laser power density (PD) are considered. In addition, the combination of a micromanipulator with an operating microscope allows the use of additional techniques aimed at preventing restenosis, such as the use of microflaps, submucosal laryngeal cicatricial tissue vaporization. The possibilities of the recurrence of cicatricial stenosis by different variants of stenting are presented. The risk of complications of this technique is not higher than in other types of larynx laser surgeries, and with proper preventive measures can be minimized. In the review, possible complications, both early and late, measures of their prophylaxis, as well as ways to eliminate their consequences are analyzed in detail.
About the Authors
V. V. VavinRussian Federation
Vyacheslav V. Vavin, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher of the Scientific and Clinical Department of Upper Respiratory Diseases
30, Bldg. 2, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182
I. I. Nazhmudinov
Russian Federation
Ibragim I. Nazhmudinov, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Scientific and Clinical Department of Upper Respiratory Diseases, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Scientific and Clinical Center of Otorhinolaryngology” of the Federal Medico-Biological Agency of Russia; Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
30, Bldg. 2 Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182;
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, 117997
Kh. Sh. Davudov
Russian Federation
Khasan Sh. Davudov, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), professor, Deputy Director
30, Bldg. 2, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182
T. I. Garashchenko
Russian Federation
Tat’yana I. Garashchenko, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), professor, academic secretary, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Scientific and Clinical Center of Otorhinolaryngology” of the Federal Medico-Biological Agency of Russia; Professor of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Continuing Professional Education, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
30, Bldg. 2 Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182;
1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, 117997
B. Kh. Davudova
Russian Federation
Basharat Kh. Davudova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), senior researcher, otorhinolaryngologist
30, Bldg. 2, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182
K. M. Magomedova
Russian Federation
Kamila M. Magomedova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), otorhinolaryngologist
30, Bldg. 2, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182
M. Yu. Khoranova
Russian Federation
Marina Yu. Khoranova, junior researcher, otorhinolaryngologist
30, Bldg. 2, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182
References
1. Steiner W., Fagan J. Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) of cancer & other pathology of the upper aerodigestive tract. In: Fagan J. et al. The Open Access Atlas of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Operative Surgery. University of Cape Town; 2017. doi: 10.15641/0-7992-2534-1.
2. Wang Z., Devaiah A.K., Feng L. Fiber-guided CO2-laser surgery in an animal model. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006;24(5):646–650. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.646.
3. Yan Y., Olszewski A.E., Hoffman R.M., Ford C.N., Dailey H.S., Jiang S.H. Use of Lasers in Laryngeal Surger. Journal of Voice. 2010;24(1):102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.09.006.
4. Zeitels S.M., Burns J.A. laser applications in laryngology: past, present, future. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39(1):159–172. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.10.001.
5. Maiman T.H. Stimulated Optical Radiation in Ruby. Nature. 1960;187:493– 494. doi: 10.1038/187493a0.
6. Ossoff R.H., Coleman J.A., Courey M.S., Duncavage J.A., Werkhaven J.A., Reinisch L. Clinical applications of lasers in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 1994;15(3):217–248. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900150302.
7. Peter H. CO2Lasers: The Four Keys To Success. June 8, 2011. Available at: https://www.veterinarypracticenews.com/co2-lasers-the-four-keys-to-success/
8. Zeitels S.M., Burns J.A. Office-based laryngeal laser surgery with local anesthesia. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15(6):394-400. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282f1fbb2.
9. Crockett D.M., Reynolds B.N. Laryngeal laser surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1990;23(1):49–66. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2179824.
10. Franco R.A. Jr., Zeitels S.M., Farinelli W.A., Faquin W., Anderson R.R. 585-nm pulsed dye laser treatment of glottal dysplasia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(9 Pt 1):751–758. doi: 10.1177/000348940311200902.
11. Hatayama H., Kato J., Inoue A., Akashi G., Hirai Y. Comparison of violet diode laser with CO2-laser in surgical performance of soft tissues. Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering. 2007;2007:64250E. doi: 10.1117/12.699475.
12. Kothari P., Dhillon R. Key developments in otolaryngology. Practitioner. 2006;250(1679):57–58, 60, 62. Available at: https://www.pubfacts.com/ detail/16514856/Key-developments-in-otolaryngology.
13. Nerurkar N., Narkar N., Joshi A., Kalel K., Bradoo R. Vocal outcomes following subepithelial infiltration technique in microflap surgery: a review of 30 cases. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(8):768–771. doi: 10.1017/S002221510700744X.
14. Zeitels S.M., Kobler J.B., Heaton J.T., Faquin W. Carbon dioxide laser fiber for laryngeal cancer surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(7):535– 541. doi: 10.1177/000348940611500708.
15. Ledda G.P., Grover N., Pundir V., Masala E., Puxeddu R. Functional outcomes after CO2-laser treatment of early glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(6):1007–1011. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000217557.45491.BD.
16. Strong M.S., Jako G.J. Laser surgery in the larynx. Early clinical experience with continuous CO2-laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1972;81(6):791–798. doi: 10.1177/000348947208100606.
17. Xu W., Han D., Hou L., Zhang L., Yu Z., Huang Z. Voice function following CO2-laser microsurgery for precancerous and early stage glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(6):637–641. doi: 10.1080/00016480600987776.
18. Kryukov A.I., Tsarapkin G.Yu., Arzamasov S.G., Panasov S.A. The application of lasers in otorhinolaryngology. Vestnik otorinolaringologii = Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2016;81(6):62–66. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/otorino20168162-66.
19. Arroyo H.H., Neri L., Fussuma C.Y., Imamura R. Diode Laser for Laryngeal Surgery: a Systematic. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;20(02):172–179. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1579741.
20. Dalal N., Urvish S., Ajay S. Role of CO2-laser and Diode laser in ENT. GCSMC J Med Sci. 2017;6(1):27–31. Available at: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=1656914.
21. Tan N.C.-W., Pittore B., Puxeddu R. The «M» shaped microflap for treatment of complex Reinke’s Space Oedema of the vocal cords. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010;30:259–263. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1c0f/df4da17ca42a3480cdf8ff8c77f5f3bb813c.pdf?_ga=2.268484657.1101270703.1581333559-36641059.1571644276.
22. Rakunova E.B. The modern possibilities for the treatment of the patients presenting with benign and tumour-like diseases of the larynx. Vestnik otorinolaringologii = Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2017;82(1):68–72. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/otorino201782168-72.
23. Chekan V.L. The treatment of combined cicatrical stenoses of the larynx and trachea. Vestnik otorinolaringologii = Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2013;78(1):64–67. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/vestnik-otorinolaringologii/2013/1/030042-46682013115.
24. Daykhes N.A. Nazhmudinov S.G., Guseynov I.I., Romanenko I.G. Chronic cicatrical stenosis of the larynx: clinical recommendations. Moscow; 2016. 18 p. Access mode: http://www.nmaoru.org/files/KR303%20Hr%20rubcovye%20stenozy%20gortani.pdf.
25. Pavlov P.V., Zakharova M.L., Korniyevskiy L.A. Modern aspects of laryngotracheal reconstruction in children. Pediatr = Pediatrician (St. Petersburg). 2017;8(special issue):251. Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-aspekty-laringotrahealnoy-rekonstruktsii-u-detey/viewer.
26. Zalzal G.H., Cotton R.T. Glottic and subglottic stenosis. In: Cumming C.W. (ed.). Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery. 2nd ed. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, London, Philadelphia, Sydney, Toronto; 2000.
27. Karpishchenko S.A., Ryabova M.A., Ulupov M.Yu., Shumilova N.A., Portnov G.V. The choice of parameters for the laser application in ENT surgery. Vestnik otorinolaringologii = Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2016;81(4):14– 18. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/otorino201681414-18.
28. Arroyo H.H., Neri L., Fussuma C.Y., Imamura R. Diode Laser for Laryngeal Surgery: a Systematic. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;20(02):172–179. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1579741.
29. Haykal S., Salna M., Waddell T.K., Hofer S.O. Advances in Tracheal Reconstruct ion. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(7):178. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000097.
30. Karasu M.F., Gundogdu R., Cagli S. et al. Comparison of effects on voice of diode laser and cold knife microlaryngology techniques for vocal fold polyps. J Voice. 2014;28(3):387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.017.
31. Vavin VV, Dobretsov KG. Features of microsurgery of the vestibular larynx using CO and a diode laser. Vestnik otorinolaringologii = Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2019;84(2):57–60. doi: 10.17116/otorino20198402157.
32. Nazhmudinov I.I., Vavin V.V., Davudov K.S., Garashchenko T.I., Davudova B.K., Magomedova K.M., Khoranova M.Y. Options for surgical treatment of cicatrical stenosis of the middle (folded) larynx. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2019;(21):118–125. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-201921-118-125.
33. Ossoff R.H., Matar S.A. The advantages of laser treatment of tumors of the larynx. Oncology (Williston Park). 1988;2(9):58–61, 64–65. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3275068.
34. Remacle M., Eckel H.E. Surgery of Larynx and Trachea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
35. Remacle M., Eckel H., Antonelli A. et al. Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):227–331. doi: 10.1007/s004050050228.
36. Haug M.H., Møller P., Olofsson J. Laser surgery in otorhinolaryngology: a 10-year experience. J Otolaryngol. 1993;22(1):42–45. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8445703.
Review
For citations:
Vavin VV, Nazhmudinov II, Davudov KS, Garashchenko TI, Davudova BK, Magomedova KM, Khoranova MY. Features of CO2-laser application in surgical treatment of chronic cicatrical stenoses of the larynx. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(6):108-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-6-108-113