Strategy for the management of osteoarthritis in multimorbid patients: the balance of effectiveness and safety while choosing drug therapy
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-11-164-176
Abstract
Due to the increase in life expectancy, the number of elderly and senile people with various chronic diseases is growing. One of the most common diseases of the musculoskeletal system is osteoarthritis. According to existing recommendations among all medications the leading place in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis is given to symptomatic slowacting drugs (SYSADOA). Data from numerous studies show that these patients are often multimorbid, and this fact significantly restricts the appointment of many medications. In such cases, the use of drugs from the SYSADOA group becomes the basis of therapy due to their safety. Medications of this group include chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate. They are the main structural components of cartilage and synovial fluid and they are used for the synthesis of glycosaminoglycans, they reduce the degradation of cartilage, and also exhibit analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. In addition, a number of other pleiotropic effects of these drugs have been shown, including a positive effect on muscles in sarcopenia, on reducing the risk of death from several cancers and complications of diabetes mellitus. In recent years, there has also been evidence of the use of the natural egg membrane preparation (NEM), which contains natural glycosaminoglycans and proteins necessary for maintaining the condition of the cartilage and synovial membrane. Studies have shown its anti-inflammatory effect, reducing the intensity of pain and improving functional indicators in patients with osteoarthritis. There was also a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in osteoarthritis for the plant-derived substance harpagophytum, which has therapeutic potential in the treatment of diseases associated with inflammation and oxidative stress.
About the Authors
K. Yu. Belova
Yaroslavl State Medical University; Yaroslavl Regional Clinical emergency hospital named after N.V. Solovyov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kseniia Yu. Belova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), associate Professor of the Department of therapy, Institute of postgraduate education; Head of Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis
5, Revolutsionnaya St., Yaroslavl, 150003
11, Zagorodny Sad St., Yaroslavl, 150000
A. V. Nazarova
Yaroslavl Regional Clinical emergency hospital named after N.V. Solovyov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna V. Nazarova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Rheumatologist of Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Center of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis
11, Zagorodny Sad St., Yaroslavl, 150000
References
1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.
2. Castell M.V., van der Pas S., Otero A., Siviero P., Dennison E., Denkinger M. et al. Osteoarthritis and frailty in elderly individuals across six European countries: results from the European Project on OSteoArthritis (EPOSA). BMC Musculoskelet Disords. 2015;16:359. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0807-8.
3. Naumov A.V., Shamuilova M.M. Osteoarthritis – a solution strategy: a view with the benefit of modern knowledge. Consilium Medicum. 22012;14(2):81–85. (In Russ.) Available at: https://medi.ru/info/9228/.
4. Naumov A.V., Hovasova N.O., Tkacheva O.N. Chondropenia followed by epidemic of osteoarthritis: from joint aging to the clinical manifestations. Lechashchiy vrach = Attending Doctor. 2018;(12):69–73. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.diamed-farma.com/content/articles/xondropeniya-v-avangarde-epidemii-osteoartrita.pdf.
5. Hana S., Aicha B.T., Selim D., Ines M., Rawdha T. Clinical and Radiographic Features of Knee Osteoarthritis of Elderly Patients. Current Rheumatology Reviews. 2018;14(2):181–187. doi: 10.2174/1573397113666170425150133.
6. Pihl K., Turkiewicz A., Hughes V., Zhang W., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.A., PrietoAlhambra D., Englund M. OR0184 Risk of comorbidities following incident clinician-diagnosed knee or hip osteoarthritis: a registry-based cohort study. Ann Rheumatol Dis. 2020;79:114. Available at: https://ard.bmj.com/content/79/Suppl_1/114.1.
7. Swain S., Sarmanova A., Coupland C., Doherty M., Zhang W. Comorbidities in Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72(7):991–1000. doi: 10.1002/acr.24008.
8. Bannuru R.R., Osani M.C., Vaysbrot E.E., Arden N.K., Bennell K., BiermaZeinstra S.M.A. et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(11):1578–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011.
9. Bruyère O., Honvo G., Veronese N., Arden N.K., Branco J., Curtis E.M. et al. An Updated Algorithm Recommendation for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis From the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2019;49(3):337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.04.008.
10. Kloppenburg M., Kroon F.P., Blanco F.J., Doherty M., Dziedzic K.S., Greibrokk E. et al. 2018 Update of the EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Hand Osteoarthritis Ann the Rheumc Dis. 2019;78(1):16–24. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213826.
11. Nasonov E.L. (ed.) Russian clinical guidelines. Rheumatology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. 464 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.rosmedlib.ru/book/ISBN9785970442616.html.
12. Naumov A.V., Alekseeva L.I. Management of patients with osteoarthritis and comorbidity in general medical practice. Clinical guidelines. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.). Available at: https://medvestnik.ru/apps/mv/assets/uploads/%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%B8/REK-osteo2016.pdf.
13. Conaghan P.G., Arden N., Avouac B., Migliore A., Rizzoli R. Safety of Paracetamol in Osteoarthritis: What Does the Literature Say? Drugs&Aging. 2019;36(S1):7–14. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00658-9.
14. Kanchanasurakit S., Arsu A., Siriplabpla W., Duangjai A., Saokaew S. Acetaminophen use and risk of renal impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Research and Clinical Practice. 2020;39(1):81–92. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.19.106.
15. Roberts E., Delgado Nunes V., Buckner S., Latchem S., Constanti M., Miller P. et al. Paracetamol: not as safe as we thought? A systematic literature review of observational studies. Ann Rheumat Dis. 2015;75(3):552–559. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206914.
16. Leopoldino A.O., Machado G.C., Ferreira P.H., Pinheiro M.B., Day R., McLachlan A.J. et al. Paracetamol versus placebo for knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;(2):CD013273. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013273.
17. Cooper C., Chapurlat R., Al-Daghri N., Herrero-Beaumont G., Bruyère O., Rannou F. et al. Safety of Oral Non-Selective Non-Steroidal AntiInflammatory Drugs in Osteoarthritis: What Does the Literature Say? Drugs&Aging. 2019;36(1):15–24. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00660-1.
18. Li L., Lu N., Xie H., Cibere J., Kopec J., Esdaile J., Avina-Zubieta J.A. OP0191 Association of tramadol with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and hip fractures among patients with osteoarthritis. A population-based study. Ann Rheumat Dis. 2020;79:118–119. Available from: https://ard.bmj.com/content/79/Suppl_1/118.1.
19. Alekseeva L.I. Сlinical guidelines update on the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis in 2019. RMZh = RMJ. 2019;(4):2–6. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/revmatologiya/Obnovlenie_klinicheskih_rekomendaciy_po_lecheniyu_bolynyh_osteoartritom_2019_goda/
20. Honvo G., Bruyère O., Reginster J.-Y. Update on the role of pharmaceuticalgrade chondroitin sulfate in the symptomatic management of knee osteoarthritis. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2019;31(8):1163–1167. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01253-z.
21. Simental‐Mendía M., Sánchez‐García A., Acosta‐Olivo C.A., Vilchez‐ Cavazos F., Osuna‐Garate J., Peña‐Martínez V.M., Simental-Mendia L.S. Efficacy and safety of avocado‐soybean unsaponifiables for the treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized placebo‐controlled trials. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(9):1607–1615. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13658.
22. Pavelka K., Bruyère O., Cooper C., Kanis J.A., Leeb B.F., Maheu E. et al. Diacerein: Benefits, Risks and Place in the Management of Osteoarthritis. An Opinion-Based Report from the ESCEO. Drugs&Aging. 2016;33(2):75– 85. doi: 10.1007/s40266-016-0347-4.
23. Guo S., Guo X., Zhang H., Zhang X., Li Z. The Effect of Diacerein on Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. J Diabet Res. 2020;2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/2593792.
24. Tres G.S., Fuchs S.C., Piovesan F., Koehler-Santos P., Pereira F. dos S., Camey S. et al. Effect of Diacerein on Metabolic Control and Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Antidiabetic Agents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Diabet Res. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/4246521.
25. Pelletier J.-P., Martel-Pelletier J. Diacerein-containing products: same risk of diarrhoea? Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(4):411–412. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-0911-3.
26. Lv C., Wang L., Zhu X., Lin W., Chen X., Huang Z. et al. Glucosamine promotes osteoblast proliferation by modulating autophagy via the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Biomedicine&Pharmacotherapy. 2018;99:271–277. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.066.
27. Gromova O.A., Torshin I.Y., Lila A.M., Shostak N.A., Rudakov K.V. Molecular mechanisms of myoprotective action of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate in sarcopenia. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2019;11(1):117–124. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2019-1-117-124.
28. Torshin I.Yu., Gromova O.A., Lila A.M., Naumov A.V., Sorokina M.A., Rudakov K.V. The results of postgenomic analysis of a glucosamine sulfate molecule indicate the prospects of treatment for comorbidities. Sovremennaya revmatologiya = Modern Rheumatology. 2018;12(4):129–136. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2018-4-129-136.
29. Engles C.D., Hauser P.J., Abdullah S.N., Culkin D.J., Hurst R.E. Intravesical Chondroitin Sulfate Inhibits Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells in an Acute Acid Damage “Leaky Bladder” Model of Cystitis. Urology. 2012;79(2):483.e13–483.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.010.
30. Hardingham T. Chondroitin sulfate and joint disease. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 1998;6(SA):3–5. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(98)80004-6.
31. Bishnoi M., Jain A., Hurkat P., Jain S.K. Chondroitin sulphate: a focus on osteoarthritis. Glycoconjugate Journal. 2016;33(5):693–705. doi: 10.1007/s10719-016-9665-3.
32. Shavlovskaya O.A., Romanov I.D. The use of chondroitin sulfate (Mucosat) for the treatment of chronic back pain and osteoarthritis. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(2):122–130. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2020-2-122-130.
33. Conte A., Volpi N., Palmieri L., Bahous I., Ronca G. Biochemical and pharmacokinetic aspects of oral treatment with chondroitin sulfate. Arzneimittelforschung. 1995;45(8):918–925. Available at: https://www.vetanco.com/pdf/cosequin/Conte%20A.%20Volpi.arzneim-Forsch%20Drug.%201995.pdf.
34. Rodichkin P.V., Shalamanov N.S. Clinical harmacology of cartilage protectors. Obzory po klinicheskoy fapmakologii i lekarstvennoy terapii = Reviews on Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2012;10(3):18–27. (In Russ.) Available at: https://journals.eco-vector.com/RCF/article/viewFile/767/372.
35. Kastana P., Choleva E., Poimenidi E., Karamanos N., Sugahara K., Papadimitriou E. Insight into the role of chondroitin sulfate E in angiogenesis. FEBS Journal. 2019;286(15):2921–2936. doi: 10.1111/febs.14830.
36. Khan A.R., Yang X., Du X., Yang H., Liu Y., Khan A.Q., Zhai G. Chondroitin sulfate derived theranostic and therapeutic nanocarriers for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2020;233:115837. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115837.
37. Hatano S., Watanabe H. Regulation of Macrophage and Dendritic Cell Function by Chondroitin Sulfate in Innate to Antigen-Specific Adaptive Immunity. Fron Immunol. 2020;11. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00232.
38. Zegels B., Crozes P., Uebelhart D., Bruyère O., Reginster J.Y. Equivalence of a single dose (1200 mg) compared to a three-time a day dose (400 mg) of chondroitin 4&6 sulfate in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Results of a randomized double blind placebo controlled study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013;21(1):22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.017.
39. Pavelká K., Gatterová J., Olejarová M., Machacek S., Giacovelli G., Rovati L.C. Glucosamine Sulfate Use and Delay of Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis: A 3-Year, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(18):2113–2123. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.18.2113.
40. Zhu X., Wu D., Sang L., Wang Y., Shen Y., Zhuang X. et al. Comparative effectiveness of glucosamine, chondroitin, acetaminophen or celecoxib for the treatment of knee and/or hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(4):595–602. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29465368/
41. Gromova O.A., Torshin I.Yu., Lila A.M., Gromov A.N. Molecular mechanisms of action of glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the joints and spine: results of proteomic analysis. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018;10(2):38–44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/2074-2711-2018-2-38-44.
42. Naumov A.V., Vertkin A.L., Shamuilova M.M., Mendel O.I., Semenov P.A., Sharina N.P. Risk stratification and strategic solutions in the osteoarthritis pharmacotherapy in therapeutic practice. Spravochnik poliklinicheskogo vracha = Outpatient Doctor’s Guide. 2009;(5):38‒45. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.fesmu.ru/elib/Article.aspx?id=206080.
43. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Dorais M., Haraoui B., Choquette D., Abram F. et al. Total Knee Replacement as a Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome: Predictors Derived from a 4-Year Long-Term Observation following a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Chondroitin Sulfate. Cartilage. 2013;4(3):219–226. doi: 10.1177/1947603513483547.
44. Singh J.A., Noorbaloochi S., MacDonald R., Maxwell L.J. Chondroitin for osteoarthritis. Singh J.A., editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(1):CD005614. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd005614.pub2.
45. Hochberg M.C., Martel-Pelletier J., Monfort J., Möller I., Castillo J.R., Arden N. et al. Combined chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine for painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial versus celecoxib. Ann Rheumat Dis. 2015;75(1):37–44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206792.
46. Navarro S.L., Herrero M., Martinez H., Zhang Y., Ladd J., Lo E. et al. Differences in Serum Biomarkers Between Combined Glucosamine and Chondroitin Versus Celecoxib in a Randomized, Double-blind Trial in Osteoarthritis Patients. Antiinflamm AntiAllergy Agents Med Chem. 2020;19(2):190–201. doi: 10.2174/1871523018666190115094512.
47. Reginster J.-Y., Dudler J., Blicharski T., Pavelka K. Pharmaceutical-grade Chondroitin sulfate is as effective as celecoxib and superior to placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: the ChONdroitin versus CElecoxib versus Placebo Trial (CONCEPT). Ann Rheumat Dis. 2017;76(9):1537–1543. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210860.
48. Naumov A.V., Sharov M.N., Khovasova N.O., Prokofieva Yu.S. Results of the intermittent regimen of initial pain therapy with chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate for patients with osteoarthritis, back pain and comorbidity. RMZh = RMJ. 2018;4(II):47–54. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/nevrologiya/Rezulytaty_primeneniya_intermittiruyuschey_shemy_parenteralynogo_vvedeniya_hondroitina_sulyfata_i_glyukozamina_sulyfata_v_startterapii_hronicheskoy_boli_v_sustavah_i_spine_u_komorbidnyh_pacientov/
49. Singh J.A., Noorbaloochi S., MacDonald R., Maxwell L.J. Chondroitin for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015(1):CD005614. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005614.pub2.
50. Honvo G., Reginster J.-Y., Rabenda V., Geerinck A., Mkinsi O., Charles A. et al. Safety of Symptomatic Slow-Acting Drugs for Osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drugs&Aging. 2019;36(S1):65–99. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00662-z.
51. Zhu X., Sang L., Wu D., Rong J., Jiang L. Effectiveness and safety of glucosamine and chondroitin for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0871-5.
52. Bell G.A., Kantor E.D., Lampe J.W., Shen D.D., White E. Use of glucosamine and chondroitin in relation to mortality. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;27(8):593–603. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9714-6.
53. Gromova O.A., Torshin I.Yu., Lila A.M., Romanov I.S., Nazarenko A.G. Systematic study review on antitumor effects of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate cartilage protectors. RMZh = RMG. 2019;4(1):4–10. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/revmatologiya/Sistematicheskiy_analiz_issledovaniy_protivoopuholevyh_effektov_hondroprotektorov_glyukozamina_sulyfata_i_hondroitina_sulyfata/
54. Kantor E.D., Newton C.C., Giovannucci E.L., McCullough M.L., Campbell P.T., Jacobs E.J. Glucosamine use and risk of colorectal cancer: results from the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Cancer Causes & Control. 2018;29(3):389–397. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1003-6.
55. Scroggie D.A., Albright A., Harris M.D. The Effect of GlucosamineChondroitin Supplementation on Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Placebo-Controlled, Doubleblinded, Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(13):1587–1590. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.13.1587.
56. Gromova O.N., Torshin I.Yu., Lila A.M., Naumov A.V., Gromov A.N., Rudakov K.V. On the safety of glucosamine sulfate in patients with insulin resistance. Consilium Medicum. 2019;21(4):75–83. (In Russ.) Available at: http://www.fesmu.ru/elib/Article.aspx?id=386575.
57. Danilov A.B. Antinociceptive effect of chondroprotectors: myth or reality? Manage pain. 2018;(1):8–13. (In Russ.)
58. Dydykina I.S., Kovalenko P.S., Kovalenko A.A. Addition to the modern arsenal of agents for the therapy of osteoarthritis. domestic chondroitin sulfate preparation: emphasis on the safety of its application. Farmateka. 2018;(s2):12–19. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18565/pharmateca.2018.s2.12-19.
59. Zakirova D.R., Burganov E.R., Gainutdinov A.R., Khuzina G.R. Phenotypic classification of osteoarthritis and the possibility of pathogenetic therapy. Sovremennaya meditsina = Modern Nedicine. 2018;(1):209–212. (In Russ.) Available at: http://infocompany-sovmed.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/183-186.pdf.
60. Istomina E.V., Shikhkerimov R.K. The possibilities of using chondroitin sulfate in patients with chronic back pain. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019;119(3):12–15. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201911903112.
61. Antipenko E.A., Erokhina M.N., Sedyshev D.V., Kozlova T.Yu., Lapshina O.V. Localized Chondroprotective Therapy as a Part of Comprehensive Treatment for Chronic Back Pain Doktor.Ru. 2019;6(161):27–30. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31550/1727-2378-2019-161-6-27-30.
62. Guliyeva G.I., Koichuev A.A., Guliyeva L.A. Mucosat in treatment of osteoarthritis. Khirurgiya. Jurnal im. N.I. Pirogova = Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(12):111–115. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2018121111.
63. Current concept of interdisciplinary specialists on the problem of degenerative-dystrophic diseases of joints and spine. Poliklinika = Outpatients’ Clinic. 2017;(Special issue 4). (In Russ.) Available at: https://medi.ru/info/14973/#cslm_anch.
64. Danesch U., Seybold M., Rittinghausen R., Treibel W., Bitterlich N. NEM Brand Eggshell Membrane Effective in the Treatment of Pain Associated with Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis: Results from a Six Center, Open Label German Clinical Study. Journal of Arthritis. 2014;3(3). doi: 10.4172/2167-7921.1000136.
65. Brunello E., Masini A. NEM Brand Eggshell Membrane Effective in the Treatment of Pain and Stiffness Associated with Osteoarthritis of the Knee in an Italian Study Population. Int J Clin Med. 2016;7(2):169–175. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2016.72017.
66. Benson K.F., Ruff K.J., Jensen G.S. Effects of Natural Eggshell Membrane (NEM) on Cytokine Production in Cultures of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells: Increased Suppression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels After In Vitro Digestion. J Med Food. 2012;15(4):360–368. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2011.0197.
67. Ruff K.J., Winkler A., Jackson R.W., DeVore D.P., Ritz B.W. Eggshell membrane in the treatment of pain and stiffness from osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Clinical Rheumatology. 2009;28(8):907–914. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1173-4.
68. Ruff K.J., DeVore D.P., Leu M.D., Robinson M.A. Eggshell membrane: A possible new natural therapeutic for joint and connective tissue disorders. Results from two open-label human clinical studies. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2009;2009(4):235–240. doi: 10.2147/cia.s5797.
69. Ruff K.J., Morrison D., Duncan S.A., Back M., Aydogan C., Theodosakis J. Beneficial effects of natural eggshell membrane versus placebo in exercise-induced joint pain, stiffness, and cartilage turnover in healthy, postmenopausal women. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2018;13:285–295. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S15378.
70. Menghini L., Recinella L., Leone S., Chiavaroli A., Cicala C., Brunetti L. et al. Devil’s claw (Harpagophytum procumbens) and chronic inflammatory diseases: A concise overview on preclinical and clinical data. Phytother Res. 2019;33(9):2152–2162. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6395.
71. Haseeb A., Ansari M.Y., Haqqi T.M. Harpagoside suppresses IL-6 expression in primary human osteoarthritis chondrocytes. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2016;35(2):311–320. doi: 10.1002/jor.23262.
72. Chung H.-J., Kim W.K., Oh J., Kim M., Shin J.-S., Lee J. et al. Anti-Osteoporotic Activity of Harpagoside by Upregulation of the BMP2 and Wnt Signaling Pathways in Osteoblasts and Suppression of Differentiation in Osteoclasts. J Natl Prod. 2017;80(2):434–442. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00964.
73. Schopohl P., Grüneberg P., Melzig M.F. The influence of harpagoside and harpagide on TNFα-secretion and cell adhesion molecule mRNA-expression in IFNγ/LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells. Fitoterapia. 2016;110:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2016.03.005.
Review
For citations:
Belova KY, Nazarova AV. Strategy for the management of osteoarthritis in multimorbid patients: the balance of effectiveness and safety while choosing drug therapy. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(11):164-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-11-164-176
Views:
772
Email this article 