Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Hepatocellular carcinoma of non-viral etiology: From theory to real practice

https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-260

Abstract

Introduction. Non-viral etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for one third to one half of cases in European and American countries. In the 21st century, the role of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is growing annually. Etiology affects the molecular genetic type of HCC, which is realized in the different effectiveness of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Subgroup analysis of randomized trials confirms this fact. Studies of real clinical practice demonstrate similar or better treatment results with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-viral etiology. Data on the effectiveness of HCC therapy of various etiologies in the Russian population are extremely limited and are of legitimate interest.

Aim. To study the long-term results of treatment of patients with non-viral HCC in routine practice.

Materials and methods. The retrospective study included patients over 18 years of age with a morphologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC established in 2021–2022, not subject to surgical or locoregional treatment due to its prevalence, without viral hepatitis, who received treatment with multikinase inhibitors at the Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Dispensary. A total of 62 patients met the criteria: 32 received lenvatinib, 30 – sorafenib. HCC stage BCLC C was in 44 patients (71.0%), liver function according to Child–Pugh class B – in 10 (15.8%), AFP more than 400 ng/ml – in 17 (27.4

Results. First-line treatment was completed by 52 patients (83.9%), death was recorded in 40 patients (64.5%). The objective response rate was 25.8%, however, there were no complete responses, and all cases of response to treatment were partial – 16 out of 62 (25.8%). Stabilization was achieved in 39 patients (62.9%), and disease control was achieved in 55 patients (88.7%). Long-term disease control (more than 23 weeks) was 69.4% (in 43 patients). Disease progression at the first control (2–3 months after the start of treatment) was noted in 7 patients (11.3%). Second-line treatment was received by 18 out of 52 patients (34.6%). The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI 6.4–14.6), and the median OS was 20.5 months (95% CI 14.6 – n/a).

Conclusion. The obtained remote results of treatment of patients with non-viral HCC with tyrosine kinase inhibitors demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of the chosen approach. Further study of this group of patients is required not only in clinical practice, but also in prospective randomized trials.

About the Authors

V. V. Petkau
Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Vladislav V. Petkau, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Oncology and Radiation Diagnostics

3, Repin St., Ekaterinburg, 620028



N. E. Krasilnikova
Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Natalya E. Krasilnikova, Clinical Oncologist

29, Sobolev St., Ekaterinburg, 620036



E. N. Bessonova
Ural State Medical University; Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Russian Federation

Elena N. Bessonova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Gastroenterology Department, Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1; Associate Professor of the Therapy Department, Faculty of Advanced Training, Ural State Medical University

185, Volgogradskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620102;
3, Repin St., Ekaterinburg, 620028



A. A. Tarkhanov
Sverdlovsk Regional Oncology Dispensary
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Tarkhanov, Head of the Department of X-ray Surgical Diagnostic and Treatment Methods

29, Sobolev St., Ekaterinburg, 620036



References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834.

2. Singal AG, Kanwal F, Llovet JM. Global trends in hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology: implications for screening, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20(12):864–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-023-00825-3.

3. Kardashian A, Serper M, Terrault N, Nephew LD. Health disparities in chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 2023;77(4):1382–1403. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32743.

4. Rich NE. Changing Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the United States and Worldwide. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2024;33(1):1–12. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12150546/.

5. Tsukanov VV, Osipenko MF, Beloborodova EV, Livzan MA, Khlynov IB, Alekseenko SA et al. Practical Aspects of Clinical Manifestations, Pathogenesis and Therapy of Alcoholic Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Opinion. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2023;33(4):7–13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2023-33-4-7-13.

6. GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2100–2132. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2.

7. Zeng RW, Ong CEY, Ong EYH, Chung CH, Lim WH, Xiao J et al. Global Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, Surveillance, Treatment Allocation, and Outcomes of Alcohol-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22(12):2394–2402.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.026.

8. Hwang SY, Danpanichkul P, Agopian V, Mehta N, Parikh ND, Abou-Alfa GK et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: updates on epidemiology, surveillance, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025;31(Suppl.):S228–S254. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0824.

9. Broeckhoven E, Dallmeier K. Mission 2030: Toward universal hepatitis B immunization. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025;21(1):2473222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2473222.

10. Pedrana A, Howell J, Scott N, Schroeder S, Kuschel C, Lazarus JV et al. Global hepatitis C elimination: an investment framework. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(10):927–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30010-8.

11. GBD 2020 Alcohol Collaborators. Population-level risks of alcohol consumption by amount, geography, age, sex, and year: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2020. Lancet. 2022;400(10347):185–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00847-9.

12. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, Paik JM, Henry A, Van Dongen C, Henry L. The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a systematic review. Hepatology. 2023;77(4):1335–1347. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000004.

13. Wong RJ, Cheung R, Ahmed A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the U.S. Hepatology. 2014;59(6):2188–2195. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26986.

14. Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Ong JP, Jacobson IM, Bugianesi E, Duseja A et al. Global Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Council. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Is the Fastest Growing Cause of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):748–755.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.057.

15. Dyson J, Jaques B, Chattopadyhay D, Lochan R, Graham J, Das D et al. Hepatocellular cancer: the impact of obesity, type 2 diabetes and a multidisciplinary team. J Hepatol. 2014;60(1):110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.011.

16. Pais R, Fartoux L, Goumard C, Scatton O, Wendum D, Rosmorduc O, Ratziu V. Temporal trends, clinical patterns and outcomes of NAFLD-related HCC in patients undergoing liver resection over a 20-year period. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(9):856–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14261.

17. Cho EJ, Kwack MS, Jang ES, You SJ, Lee JH, Kim YJ et al. Relative etiological role of prior hepatitis B virus infection and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the development of non-B non-C hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic area. Digestion. 2011;84(Suppl. 1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333210.

18. Liew ZH, Goh GB, Hao Y, Chang PE, Tan CK. Comparison of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cryptogenic Versus Hepatitis B Etiology: A Study of 1079 Cases Over 3 Decades. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(2):585–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5331-x.

19. Parola M, Pinzani M. Liver fibrosis in NAFLD/NASH: from pathophysiology towards diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Mol Aspects Med. 2024;95:101231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2023.101231.

20. Chen Y, Deng X, Li Y, Han Y, Peng Y, Wu W et al. Comprehensive molecular classification predicted microenvironment profiles and therapy response for HCC. Hepatology. 2024;80(3):536–551. https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000869.

21. Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY et al. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894–1905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745.

22. Sangro B, Chan SL, Kelley RK, Lau G, Kudo M, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W et al. Four-year overall survival update from the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(5):448–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.005.

23. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Cheng AL et al. Overall survival and objective response in advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A subanalysis of the REFLECT study. J Hepatol. 2023;78(1):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.09.006.

24. Cheng AL, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):862–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.030.

25. Yau T, Kaseb A, Cheng AL, Qin S, Zhu AX, Chan SL et al. Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (COSMIC-312): final results of a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;9(4):310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00454-5.

26. Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J et al. Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(1):77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00604-5.

27. Llovet JM, Kudo M, Merle P, Meyer T, Qin S, Ikeda M et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib plus placebo for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (LEAP-002): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(12):1399–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00469-2.

28. Galle PR, Decaens T, Kudo M, Qin S, Fonseca L, Sangro B et al. Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs lenvatinib (LEN) or sorafenib (SOR) as firstline treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): First results from CheckMate 9DW. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(17):LBA4008-LBA4008. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA4008.

29. Su CW, Teng W, Lin PT, Jeng WJ, Chen KA, Hsieh YC et al. Similar efficacy and safety between lenvatinib versus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2023;12(6):7077–7089. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5506.

30. Kim BK, Cheon J, Kim H, Kang B, Ha Y, Kim DY et al. Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab vs. Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World, Multi-Center Study. Cancers. 2022;14(7):1747. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071747.

31. Persano M, Rimini M, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M et al. Sequential therapies after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Eur J Cancer. 2023;189:112933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.021.

32. Rimini M, Rimassa L, Ueshima K, Burgio V, Shigeo S, Tada T et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an international propensity score matching analysis. ESMO Open. 2022;7(6):100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100591.

33. Casadei-Gardini A, Rimini M, Tada T, Suda G, Shimose S, Kudo M et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a large real-life worldwide population. Eur J Cancer. 2023;180:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.017.

34. Mayevskaya MV, Novruzbekov MS, Borovkov IM, Trofimova DG, Zharkova MS, Lunkov VD et al. Structure of Patients with Hepatocellular Cancer (Data Analysis from Two Specialised Centres). Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2020;30(2):58–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2020-30-2-58-67.

35. Petkau VV, Bessonova EH, Breder VV, Kiselev EA, Kiselev KE. Overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma of different etiologies. Practical Oncology. 2023;24(1):70–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31917/2401071.

36. Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.

37. Casadei-Gardini A, Rimini M, Kudo M, Shimose S, Tada T, Suda G et al. Real Life Study of Lenvatinib Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: RELEVANT Study. Liver Cancer. 2022;11(6):527–539. https://doi.org/10.1159/000525145.


Review

For citations:


Petkau VV, Krasilnikova NE, Bessonova EN, Tarkhanov AA. Hepatocellular carcinoma of non-viral etiology: From theory to real practice. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(10):66-73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-260

Views: 41


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)