DPYD-associated toxicity in gastric cancer therapy: Clinical case
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-245
Abstract
Given the high prevalence and mortality from gastric cancer in the global population, interest in the treatment of this disease is growing. The standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer is a combined method that includes radical surgery with perioperative polychemotherapy. For gastric cancer with distant metastases and/or a peritoneal carcinomatosis index of more than 7, as well as for the locally advanced stage, polychemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidines (FP) (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine) is used, which are characterized by the frequent development of toxic reactions. Analysis of foreign literature data with presented clinical cases of FP toxicity demonstrated that characteristic adverse events when using FP are diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, mucositis, myelosuppression, neurotoxicity and palmar-plantar syndrome. Approximately 20–30% of patients receiving FP experience severe toxicity, which can lead to death in 1% of cases, with the main cause being a deficiency of the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dihydrogenase, Due to the lack of recommendations for testing mutations and polymorphisms in the DPYD gene for gastric cancer in the Russian Federation, information on the treatment of toxic post-chemotherapy phenomena in individual clinical cases is relevant. Of particular interest is the clinical observation of a forty-three-year-old patient with morphologically verified gastric adenocarcinoma, a peritoneal carcinomatosis index of 7 and the absence of other distant metastases. After three courses of chemotherapy with the inclusion of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, the patient developed severe hematological, gastrointestinal toxicity, polyneuropathy, and therefore, on a planned basis. A molecular genetic study was performed to determine the genotype of DPYD*2A/13 associated with a high risk of toxicity during chemotherapy. According to the results of the study, a germinal missense mutation NM_000110.4(DPYD): c.2194G>A (p.Val732Ile) was detected in the DPYD gene. The presented analysis of information from scientific sources and the data of our own clinical observation demonstrate the need to assess the status of the DPYD gene in patients subject to FP therapy. The issue of registering an antidote to 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine – uridine triacetate in the Russian Federation also remains open.
About the Authors
M. F. KilmyashkinaRussian Federation
Marina F. Kilmyashkina, Postgraduate Student, Oncologist of the Surgical Department of Combined Treatment Methods with Chemotherapy
3, 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284
I. V. Kolobaev
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Kolobaev, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Thoracoabdominal Surgery Department of Thoracoabdominal Oncosurgery
3, 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284
Yu. B. Karagodina
Russian Federation
Yulia B. Karagodina, Researcher, Department of Drug Treatment of Tumors
3, 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284
V. M. Khomyakov
Russian Federation
Vladimir M. Khomyakov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Scientific Thoracoabdominal Surgical Department of the Department of Thoracoabdominal Oncosurgery
3, 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125284
L. N. Lyubchenko
Russian Federation
Liudmila N. Lyubchenko, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Molecular Genetics and Cell Technologies Department, Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center; Oncologist, National Medical Research Radiological Center
51, Bldg. 4, 3rd Parkovaya St., Moscow, 105425;
4, Korolev St., Obninsk, 249036
References
1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834.
2. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020;396(10251):635–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5.
3. Röcken C. Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(1):467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04408-0.
4. Каприн АД, Старинский ВВ, Шахзадова АО, Лисичникова ИВ (ред.). Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России; 2023. 275 с. Режим доступа: https://glavonco.ru/cancer_register/zis-2022-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf.
5. Каприн АД, Старинский ВВ, Шахзадова АО (ред.). Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2023 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России; 2024. 276 с. Режим доступа: https://glavonco.ru/cancer_register/zis-2023.pdf.
6. Wu LW, Jang SJ, Shapiro C, Fazlollahi L, Wang TC, Ryeom SW, Moy RH. Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Features and Emerging Therapeutics. Target Oncol. 2024;19(6):845–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01097-2.
7. Lauren P. The Two Histological Main Types of Gastric Carcinoma: Diffuse and So-Called Intestinal-Type Carcinoma. An Attempt at a Histo-Clinical Classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31.
8. Chen YC, Fang WL, Wang RF, Liu CA, Yang MH, Lo SS et al. Clinicopathological Variation of Lauren Classification in Gastric Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2016;22(1):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-9996-6.
9. Бесова НС, Калинин АЕ, Неред СН, Трякин АА, Гамаюнов СВ, Козлов НА и др. Рак желудка: клинические рекомендации. М.; 2020. 83 с. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/574_1.
10. Thomassen I, van Gestel YR, van Ramshorst B, Luyer MD, Bosscha K, Nienhuijs SW et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: A population-based study on incidence, survival and risk factors. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(3):622–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28373.
11. Gingrich A, Manguso N, Zuckerman R. Treatment of Gastric Cancer Carcinomatosis. Surg Clin North Am. 2025;105(1):95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2024.06.008.
12. Ong CS, Gao JL, Tan YJ. Capecitabine related neurotoxicity: Clinical and radiologic features. J Neurol Sci. 2022;442:120444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120444.
13. Iscan D, Tolay R, Bayram E, Demir T, Bicakci S. Capecitabine-related neurotoxicity presenting with agraphia. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023;29(3):746–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552221116329.
14. van Kuilenburg AB. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(7):939–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.004.
15. Pan X, Wang C, Wang F, Li P, Hu Z, Shan Y, Zhang J. Development of 5-Fluorouracil derivatives as anticancer agents. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(29):4538–4556. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986711797287584.
16. Wei X, Elizondo G, Sapone A, McLeod HL, Raunio H, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gonzalez FJ. Characterization of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene. Genomics. 1998;51(3):391–400. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1998.5379.
17. Meulendijks D, Henricks LM, Sonke GS, Deenen MJ, Froehlich TK, Amstutz U et al. Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1639–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00286-7.
18. Amstutz U, Henricks LM, Offer SM, Barbarino J, Schellens JHM, Swen JJ et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotype and Fluoropyrimidine Dosing: 2017 Update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(2):210–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.911.
19. Wei Y, Yang P, Cao S, Zhao L. The combination of curcumin and 5-fluorouracil in cancer therapy. Arch Pharm Res. 2018;41(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-017-0979-x.
20. Diasio RB, Offer SM. Testing for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency to Individualize 5-Fluorouracil Therapy. Cancers. 2022;14(13):3207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14133207.
21. Ishiguro M, Takenaka R, Ogura K, Hiratsuka A, Takeda H, Kawai D et al. A Japanese Patient with Gastric Cancer and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency Presenting with DPYD Variants. Acta Med Okayama. 2020;74(6):557–562. https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/61217.
22. Mukherji D, Massih SA, Tfayli A, Kanso M, Faraj W. Three different polymorphisms of the DPYD gene associated with severe toxicity following administration of 5-FU: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2019;13(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-019-2013-z.
23. Loriot MA, Ciccolini J, Thomas F, Barin-Le-Guellec C, Royer B, Milano G et al. Dihydropyrimidine déhydrogenase (DPD) deficiency screening and securing of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies: Update and recommendations of the French GPCO-Unicancer and RNPGx networks. Bull Cancer. 2018;105(4):397–407. (In French) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.02.001.
24. Thompson JT, Wood DM, Dargan PI. Review of the fluoropyrimidine antidote uridine triacetate. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025;91(3):615–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16319.
Review
For citations:
Kilmyashkina MF, Kolobaev IV, Karagodina YB, Khomyakov VM, Lyubchenko LN. DPYD-associated toxicity in gastric cancer therapy: Clinical case. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(10):158-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-245