Neuroprotection in atherothrombotic stroke
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-291
Abstract
Introduction. A cumulative meta-analysis of randomized multicentre placebo-controlled studies of ischemic stroke (IS) therapy confirmed benefit of citicoline treatment in terms of increase of chance for better recovery of functional independence. The effect was observed in cases when citicoline was used at the early stages of IS. To confirm international evidence for the domestic citicoline (Ceresil® Canon), the Research Centre of Neurology analysed its own clinical material on its use in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of citicoline (Ceresil® Canon) in the acute phase of atherothrombotic stroke after systemic thrombolysis.
Materials and methods. The study group included 43 patients (27 men and 16 women, mean age 62 ± 11 years) with primary atherothrombotic stroke after systemic thrombolysis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive citicoline or standard therapy at 24 hours after recanalization. Randomization was conducted using a method with sealed envelopes. Patients (n = 24, mean age 59 ± 12 years; 17 men, 7 women; NIHSS score of 12 (9; 14) after systemic thrombolysis) received citicoline at a dose of 2,000 mg/day (solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration 250 mg/ml) IVFD for 10 days as part of standard therapy regimen, then citicoline at a dose of 1,000 mg/day (oral solution 100 mg/ml) for oral use for 45 days. The comparator group (standard therapy) included 19 patients with ischemic stroke (mean age 63 ± 12 years; 10 men, 9 women; NIHSS score of 11 (8; 13)), who underwent systemic thrombolysis, but did not receive citicoline.
Results. 70.8% of patients with atherothrombotic stroke who received citicoline added to their treatment regimen after systemic thrombolysis achieved a score of ≤2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (mild disability and functional independence) by day 56 of treatment. Patients who did not receive citicoline after systemic thrombolysis and achieved this score accounted for 36.8%. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (p = 0.034).
Conclusion. Prescription of citicoline to patients with atherothrombotic stroke after systemic thrombolysis at a dose of 2000 mg/day IVFD for 10 days, followed by oral use at a dose of 1000 mg (10 ml of solution) for oral use 45 days as part of standard therapy allows to achieve improvement of functional status.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. Yu. MaximovRussian Federation
Marina Yu. Maximova - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the 2nd Neurology Department, Scientific Center of Neurology.
80, Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow, 125367
A. S. Ayrapetova
Russian Federation
Aleksandra S. Ayrapetova - Cand. Sci. (Med.), Junior Researcher of the 2nd Neurology Department, Research Center of Neurology
80, Volokolamskoe Shosse, Moscow, 125367
References
1. Пирадов МА, Танашян ММ, Максимова МЮ. Инсульт: инновационные технологии в лечении и профилактике. М: МЕДпресс-информ; 2024. 328 с. Режим доступа: https://istina.msu.ru/publications/book/690789322/.
2. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins SO, Pandian J, Lindsay P, Grupper MF, Rautalin I. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025. Int J Stroke. 2025;20(2):132–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241308142.
3. Martin SS, Aday AW, Allen NB, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P et al. 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2025;151(8):e41–e660. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001303.
4. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K еt al. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49(3):e46–e110. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.
5. Goyal M, Yu A, Menon BK, Dippel DWJ, Hacke W, Davis SM et al. Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2016;47(2):548–553. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.115.011426.
6. Pérez-Mato M, López-Arias E, Bugallo-Casal A, Correa-Paz C, Arias S, Rodríguez-Yáñez M et al. New Perspectives in Neuroprotection for Ischemic Stroke. Neuroscience. 2024;550:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.02.017.
7. Haupt M, Gerner ST, Bähr M, Doeppner TR. Neuroprotective Strategies for Ischemic Stroke-Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054334.
8. Zhu L, Su G, Li R, Ma T, Chen W, Song J et al. The role of hypoxia/ischemia preconditioning in ischemic stroke. Neuroscience. 2025;568:343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.042.
9. Ginsberg MD. Neuroprotection for ischemic stroke: past, present and future. Neuropharmacol. 2008;55(3):363–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.12.007.
10. Piradov MA, Tanashyan MM, Domashenko MA, Sergeev DV, Maksimova MYu. Neuroprotection in cerebrovascular diseases: is it the search for life on Mars or a promising trend of treatment? Part 1. Acute stroke. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2015;9(1):41–50. (In Russ.) Available at: https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/154.
11. Yanık T, Yanık B. Current neuroprotective agents in stroke. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;70(2):157–163. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.15287.
12. Sahota P, Savitz SI. Investigational therapies for ischemic stroke: neuroprotection and neurorecovery. Neurotherapeutics. 2011;8(3):434–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-011-0040-6.
13. Narayan SK, Cherian SG, Phaniti PB, Chidambaram SB, Vasanthi AHR, Arumugam M. Preclinical animal studies in ischemic stroke: Challenges and some solutions. Animal Model Exp Med. 2021;4(2):104–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ame2.12166.
14. Ford GA. Clinical pharmacological issues in the development of acute stroke therapies. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153(Suppl. 1):112–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707654.
15. Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Stroke. 1999;30(12):2752–2758. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.12.2752.
16. Fisher M, Feuerstein G, Howells DW, Hurn PD, Kent TA, Savitz SI, Lo EH. Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2244–2250. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128.
17. Lyden P, Buchan A, Boltze J, Fisher M. Top Priorities for Cerebroprotective Studies-A Paradigm Shift: Report From STAIR XI. Stroke. 2021;52(9):3063–3071. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034947.
18. Domashenko MA, Piradov MA, Sergeev DV, Maksimova MYu. Use of citicoline in the acute period of ischemic stroke: from evidence-based medicine to real clinical practice. RMJ. 2014;22(22):1609–1612. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/nevrologiya/Primenenie_citikolina_v_ostrom_periode_ishemicheskogo_insulyta_ot_dokazatelynoy_mediciny_k_realynoy_klinicheskoy_praktike/.
19. Martí-Carvajal AJ, Valli C, Martí-Amarista CE, Solà I, Martí-Fàbregas J, Cosp XB. Citicoline for treating people with acute ischemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;8(8):CD013066. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013066.pub2.
20. Secades JJ, Gareri P. Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review, 2022 update. Rev Neurol. 2022;75(s05):S1–S89. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.75s05.2022311.
21. Zhao X, Huo X, Meng Y, Zhao R, Liu X, Chen J et al The efficacy of different doses of citicoline in improving the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke based on network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1529647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1529647.
22. Saver JL. Citicoline: update on a promising and widely available agent for neuroprotection and neurorepair. Rev Neurol. Dis. 2008;5(4):167–177. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19122569/.
23. Bustamante A, Giralt D, Garcia-Bonilla L, Campos M, Rosell A, Montaner J. Citicoline in pre-clinical animal models of stroke: a meta-analysis shows the optimal neuroprotective profile and the missing steps for jumping into a stroke clinical trial. J Neurochem. 2012;123(2):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07891.x.
24. Davalos A, Castillo J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Secades J, Mercadal J, Lopez S et al. Oral citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: an individual patient data pooling analysis of clinical trials. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2850–2857. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000038691.03334.71.
25. Parfenov VA. Citicoline for ischemic stroke: ICTUS trial. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2012;4(4):71–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2012-426.
26. Davalos A, Alvarez-Sabin J, Castillo J, Diez-Tejedor E, Ferro J, Martinez-Vila E et al. Citicoline in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study (ICTUS trial). Lancet. 2012;380(9839):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s01406736(12)60813-7.
27. Secades J, Alvarez-Sabin J, Castillo J, Diez-Tejedor E, Martinez-Vila E, Rios J, Oudovenko N. Citicoline for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Formal Meta-analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, and PlaceboControlled Trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(8):1984–1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.04.010.
Review
For citations:
Maximov MY, Ayrapetova AS. Neuroprotection in atherothrombotic stroke. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(12):14-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-291