Diagnosis and treatment of gout in real clinical practice (according to a survey of primary care physicians)
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-517
Abstract
Introduction. Gout is a chronic auto-inflammatory disease associated with the deposition of sodium monaurate crystals on the background of hyperuricemia. Despite clear international and national clinical guidelines, diagnosis is delayed by an average of 4–5 years from the first attack. The effectiveness of treatment directly depends on the timely diagnosis of the disease, as well as on the correct appointment of urate-lowering therapy.
Aim. The purpose of this study was to evaluate approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of gout among primary care physicians based on anonymous questionnaires.
Materials and methods. An anonymous survey of 190 district internists and general practitioners working in state medical institutions of the Chuvash Republic was conducted.
Results. The survey results showed a lack of awareness among respondents about diagnostic issues. Only 53.7% of the doctors’ responses met modern requirements for the diagnosis of gout. Many doctors (46.3%) mistakenly consider the presence of only one sign (for example, hyperuricemia) sufficient for diagnosis, underestimate the importance of conducting polarization microscopy of synovial fluid (75.8%), and are practically unfamiliar with alternative instrumental methods such as ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography. Significant disadvantages have also been identified in the treatment of gout. 78.4% of doctors used only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to treat an acute attack of arthritis, while only 5.3% of respondents used colchicine. The appointment of urate-lowering therapy was accompanied by errors: more than half of the doctors (52.6%) limited the maximum dose of allopurinol to 300 mg/day (with an acceptable 900 mg/day), 36.8% did not focus on the target uric acid level (<360 mcmol/l), and 53.2% did not carry out therapy on an ongoing basis. Only 11.6% of the respondents prescribed preventive anti-inflammatory therapy at the start of urate-lowering therapy.
Conclusions. Thus, the study demonstrates certain shortcomings in the diagnosis and treatment of gout at the primary health care level. According to the survey, despite the existence of clearly regulated and accessible clinical recommendations, their provisions are not fully implemented by primary care physicians, which underscores the need for additional education of outpatient doctors to improve the quality of care for patients with gout.
About the Authors
I. B. BashkovaRussian Federation
Inna B. Bashkova, Cand. Sci (Med.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Hospital Therapy, Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov; Rheumatologist, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty (Cheboksary)
15, Moskovsky Ave., Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, 428015,
33, Fedor Gladkov St., Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, 428020
I. V. Madyanov
Russian Federation
Igor V. Madyanov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Hospital Therapy, Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov; Professor of the Department of Therapy and General Medical Practice, Institute for the Improvement of Doctors
15, Moskovsky Ave., Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, 428015,
27, Mikhail Sespel St., Cheboksary, Chuvash Republic, 428018
References
1. Nasonov EL, Eliseev MS. Role of interleukin 1 in the development of human diseases. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016;54(1):60–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2016-60-77.
2. Danve A, Neogi T. Rising global burden of gout: Time to act. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(11):1786–1788. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41453.
3. Dehlin M, Jacobsson L, Roddy E. Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence, treatment patterns and risk factors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(7):380–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0441-1.
4. Asghari KM, Zahmatyar M, Seyedi F, Motamedi A, Zolfi M, Alamdary SJ et al. Gout: global epidemiology, risk factors, comorbidities and complications: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):1047. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08180-9.
5. Elfishawi MM, Zleik N, Kvrgic Z, Michet CJ Jr, Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Bongartz T. The rising incidence of gout and the increasing burden of comorbidities: A population-based study over 20 years. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(4):574–579. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170806.
6. Singh JA, Gaffo A. Gout epidemiology and comorbidities. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50(3S):S11–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.04.008.
7. Timsans J, Palomäki A, Kauppi M. Gout and hyperuricemia: A narrative review of their comorbidities and clinical implications. J Clin Med. 2024;13(24):7616. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247616.
8. Eliseev MS. Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of gout. RMJ. 2015;23(7):410–414. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/revmatologiya/Algoritm_diagnostiki_i_lecheniya_podagry.
9. Bashkova IB, Madyanov IV. Diagnosis and treatment of gout in real clinical practice: The role and place of febuxostat. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2025;19(13):185–192. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-314
10. Sklyanova MV, Kalyagin AN. Primary health care to patients with gout. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya. 2012;6(3):52–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2012-747.
11. Karnakova MV, Kalyagin AN. Has the clinical course of gout recently changed? Sovremennaya Revmatologiya. 2017;11(1):23–27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2017-1-23-27.
12. Насонов ЕЛ, Лила АМ, Клименко АА, Войтко ДА, Елисеев МС, Елисеева МЕ и др. Идиопатическая подагра: клинические рекомендации. 2025. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/936_1.
13. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D et al. 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(10):2557–2568. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39254.
14. Reinders MK, Haagsma C, Jansen TL, van Roon EN, Delsing J, van de Laar MA, Brouwers JRBJ. A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability with dose escalation of allopurinol 300-600 mg/day versus benzbromarone 100-200 mg/day in patients with gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):892–897. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.091462.
15. Jennings CG, Mackenzie IS, Flynn R, Ford I, Nuki G, De Caterina R et al.; FAST study group. Up-titration of allopurinol in patients with gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.01.004.
16. Eliseev MS, Chikina MN, Zhelyabina OV. An open 6-month study of the effectiveness of allopurinol dose titration in patients with gout as part of the “treatment to goal” strategy. RMJ. 2022;(6):17–22. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/revmatologiya/Otkrytoe_6-mesyachnoe_issledovanie_effektivnosti_titrovaniya_dozy_allopurinola_u_pacientov_s_podagroy_v_ramkah_strategii_lechenie_do_celi.
17. Becker MA, Schumacher HR Jr, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Eustace D, Palo WA et al. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2450–2461. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa050373.
18. Coburn BW, Bendlin KA, Sayles H, Meza J, Russell CL, Mikuls TR. Allopurinol medication adherence as a mediator of optimal outcomes in gout management. J Clin Rheumatol. 2017;23(6):317–323. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000561.
19. Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Barclay ML, Horne A, Frampton C, Tan P et al. A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve target serum urate in people with gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1522–1528. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210872.
20. Eliseev MS. Current issues in the practical use of allopurinol in patients with gout and hyperuricemia. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya. 2024;18(5):116–120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2024-5-116-120.
21. FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72(6):744–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24180.
22. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castañeda-Sanabria J et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):29–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707.
23. Pascart T, Latourte A, Flipo RM, Chalès G, Coblentz-Baumann L, Cohen-Solal A et al. 2020 recommendations from the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of gout: Urate-lowering therapy. Joint Bone Spine. 2020;87(5):395–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.05.002.
24. Neilson J, Bonnon A, Dickson A, Roddy E. Gout: diagnosis and managementsummary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2022;378:o1754. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1754.
25. Lorenzo JPP, Sollano MHMZ, Salido EO, Li-Yu J, Tankeh-Torres SA, Wulansari Manuaba IAR et al. 2021 Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology clinical practice guideline for treatment of gout. Int J Rheum Dis. 2022;25(1):7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.14266.
26. Eliseev MS, Nasonov EL. Treatment and diagnostics of gout: Unsolved problems in clinical practice. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2024;62(1):7–12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2024-7-12.
27. Nasonova VA, Barskova VG. Early diagnostic and treatment of gout – is scientifically based reguirements for improvement of labour and living prognosis of patients. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2004;42(1):5–7. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2004-1374.
28. Елисеев МС. Подагра. В: Насонов ЕЛ. (ред.). Ревматология: российские клинические рекомендации. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2017. С. 253–265.
29. Nasonov EL, Drapkina OM. Colchicine: Repositioning an “ancient” medicine in the 21st century. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2024;62(5):445–464. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2024-445-464.
30. Seth R, Kydd AS, Buchbinder R, Bombardier C, Edwards CJ. Allopurinol for chronic gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(10):CD006077. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006077.pub3.
31. Schumacher HR Jr, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, Macdonald PA, Hunt B, Streit J et al. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(11):1540–1548. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24209.
32. Eliseev MS. Cardiovascular diseases in gout and urate-lowering therapy. Therapy. 2021;7(1):108–115. (In Russ.) Available at: https://therapy-journal.ru/articles/Serdechno-sosudistye-zabolevaniya-pripodagre-i-uratsnijaushaya-terapiya.html.
33. Kaul S, Gupta M, Bandyopadhyay D, Hajra A, Deedwania P, Roddy E et al. Gout pharmacotherapy in cardiovascular diseases: A review of utility and outcomes. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021;21(5):499–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-020-00459-1.
34. Jutkowitz E, Choi HK, Pizzi LT, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of allopurinol and febuxostat for the management of gout. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(9):617–626. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-0227.
35. Meltzer M, Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E. Payer decision-making with limited comparative and cost effectiveness data: the case of new pharmacological treatments for gout. Evid Based Med. 2012;17(4):105–108. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2011-100065.
36. Doherty M, Jenkins W, Richardson H, Sarmanova A, Abhishek A, Ashton D. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10156):1403–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32158-5.
37. Terrill M, Riordan J. A survey of the assessment and management of gout in general practitioners and medical officers within the Illawarra Network, Australia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017;20(8):990–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.12875.
38. Terrill M, Riordan J. A survey on the beliefs and knowledge of gout management in new medical graduates – New South Wales, Australia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(2):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13097.
39. Sautner J, Sautner T. Compliance of primary care providers with gout treatment recommendations-lessons to learn: results of a nationwide survey. Front Med. 2020;7:244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00244.
40. Helget LN, Davis-Karim A, O’Dell JR, Mikuls TR, Newcomb JA, Androsenko M et al. Efficacy and safety of allopurinol and febuxostat in patients with gout and CKD: subgroup analysis of the STOP gout trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2024;84(5):538–545. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.04.017.
Review
For citations:
Bashkova IB, Madyanov IV. Diagnosis and treatment of gout in real clinical practice (according to a survey of primary care physicians). Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(22):173-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-517


































