Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

A comparative study on the role of nepafenac as a therapy component in patients after Femto-LASIK

https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-132

Abstract

Introduction. The number of patients with refraction disorders has increased significantly over the past decade, which led to a high rise in keratorefractive laser surgeries. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in ophthalmological practice appears to be a topical issue in patients who have undergone various keratorefractive surgeries.

Aim. To evaluate the clinical and pathogenetic efficacy of nepafenac as part of postoperative therapy in patients after Femto LASIK.

Materials and methods. The study included 120 patients (240 eyes) who have undergone a two-step Femto LASIK laser vision correction due to myopia, myopic, and mixed astigmatism. Patients were divided into two comparable groups: a treatment group, who received nepafenac in addition to standard therapy in the postoperative period, and a control group, who received standard therapy without nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. All patients underwent cornea optical coherence tomography (OCT) with epithelial and pachymetric mapping, as well as measurements of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 concentrations in tear fluid using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The laser confocal microscopy scans were performed to evaluate corneal nerves and epithelium.

Results and discussion. In the control group, we observed significantly higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines and incidence of epithelial instability on Day 1 after surgery. In the group of patients receiving Apfecto, interleukin-6 levels were 42% lower, and only 32% of patients displayed a great heterogeneity at the level of epithelial profile. By Days 5–7, uniform epithelial restoration was noted in 88% of patients in the treatment group versus 63% in the control group (p ≤ 0.05). The corneal confocal microscopy showed that corneal epithelium and nerve fiber status was consistent across both groups at all follow-up points.

Conclusions. The introduction of the pro-NSAID nepafenac in the postoperative treatment regimen after Femto LASIK is accompanied by significantly reduced inflammatory activity, as well as more stable and predictable corneal restoration.

About the Authors

O. M. Dovgileva
Russian Railways Medical Hospital N.A. Semashko
Russian Federation

Olga M. Dovgileva, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Eye Microsurgery Center

23, Stavropolskaya St., Moscow, 109386



Z. V. Surnina
Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Zoya V. Surnina, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Сhief Researcher, Department of Pathology of the Optical Part of the Eye

11а, Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021



References

1. Zhang H, Li M, Cen Z. Excimer Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery in the Clinic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;15:7130422. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7130422.

2. Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal JØ. Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(4):355–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02406.x.

3. Luger MH, Ewering T, Arba-Mosquera S. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(11):1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.025.

4. Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T, Lindstrom RL, Potvin R, Tremblay DM, Solomon KD. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(8):1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.012.

5. Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Gómez-Hurtado A, Blanes-Mompó FJ, Alzamora-Rodríguez A. Results of laser in situ keratomileusis performed using solid-state laser technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(3):437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.09.038.

6. Fernández-Vega-Cueto L, Lisa C, Naveiras M, Madrid-Costa D, Alfonso JF. Femto LASIK After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2020;39(4):468–472. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002193.

7. Tăbăcaru B, Stanca S, Mocanu V, Zemba M, Stanca HT, Munteanu M. Intraoperative flap-related complications in FemtoLASIK surgeries performed with Visumax® femtosecond laser: A ten-year Romanian experience. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(3):2529–2535. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8907.

8. Boiko EV, Togo ES, Suetov AA, Kachanov AB, Litvin IB. Direct assessment of changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea after ReLEx SMILE and Femto LASIK surgeries. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2023;139(3):41–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202313903141.

9. Tsai T, Alwees M, Rost A, Theile J, Dick HB, Joachim SC, Taneri S. Changes of Subjective Symptoms and Tear Film Biomarkers following Femto-LASIK. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;23(14):7512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147512.

10. Li M, Zhao J, Shen Y, Li T, He L, Xu H et al. Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077797.

11. Elmohamady MN, Abdelghaffar W, Daifalla A, Salem T. Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:935–942. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S164570.

12. Chao C, Stapleton F, Zhou X, Chen S, Zhou S, Golebiowski B. Structural and functional changes in corneal innervation after laser in situ keratomileusis and their relationship with dry eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(11):2029–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3120-1.

13. Vázquez A, Martínez-Plaza E, Fernández I, Sobas EM, González-García MJ, Enríquez-de-Salamanca A et al. Phenotypic characterization of patients developing chronic dry eye and pain after refractive surgery: A crosssectional study. Ocul Surf. 2022;26:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2022.07.010.

14. Hei Lai KK, Hu Z, Chiu JT, Aljufairi FMAA, Sebastian JU, Cheng GPM et al. Long-Term Evaluation of Ocular Surface and Meibomian Gland Function after Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis Surgery. Ophthalmic Res. 2025;68(1):84–89. https://doi.org/10.1159/000542985.

15. Chao C, Golebiowski B, Stapleton F. The role of corneal innervation in LASIKinduced neuropathic dry eye. Ocul Surf. 2014;12(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2013.09.001.

16. Gan W, Yang S, Zhang Y, Hu Q, He P, Du Z. Comparative corneal biomechanical changes after FS-LASIK and orthokeratology. Biomed Eng Online. 2025;19;25(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01503-4.

17. Sharma B, Soni D, Saxena H, Stevenson LJ, Karkhur S, Takkar B, Vajpayee RB. Impact of corneal refractive surgery on the precorneal tear film. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):2804–2812. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2296_19.

18. Lim EWL, Lim L. Review of Laser Vision Correction (LASIK, PRK and SMILE) with Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking – Long-term Results. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(11):1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1656749.

19. Bashir ZS, Ali MH, Anwar A, Ayub MH, Butt NH. Femto-lasik: The recent innovation in laser assisted refractive surgery. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(4):609–615. Available at: https://www.archive.jpma.org.pk/articledetails/8166.

20. Alió JL, Javaloy J. Corneal inflammation following corneal photoablative refractive surgery with excimer laser. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(1):11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.04.005.

21. Vázquez A, Blanco-Vázquez M, Martínez-Plaza E, Sobas EM, González-García MJ, López-Miguel A et al. Corneal Sensory Changes and Nerve Plexus Abnormalities in Chronic Neuropathic Ocular Pain and Dry Eye Postrefractive Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025;276:170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.004.

22. Walters T, Raizman M, Ernest P, Gayton J, Lehmann R. In vivo pharmacokinetics and in vitro pharmacodynamics of nepafenac, amfenac, ketorolac, and bromfenac. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1539–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.015.

23. Bezatis A, Georgou I, Dedes J, Theodossiadis P, Chatziralli I. Nepafenac in cataract surgery. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105(3):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.1945412.

24. Mathys KC, Cohen KL. Impact of nepafenac 0.1% on macular thickness and postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery in patients at low risk for cystoid macular oedema. Eye. 2010;24(1):90–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.10.

25. Zhao X, Xia S, Wang E, Chen Y. Comparison of the efficacy and patients’ tolerability of Nepafenac and Ketorolac in the treatment of ocular inflammation following cataract surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0173254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173254.

26. Vantesone DL, Luna JD, Muiño JC, Juárez CP. Effects of topical diclofenac and prednisolone eyedrops in laser in situ keratomileusis patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(6):836–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00027-9.

27. Apt L, Voo I, Isenberg SJ. A randomized clinical trial of the nonsteroidal eyedrop diclofenac after strabismus surgery. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(8):1448–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)98026-5.

28. Baek SH, Choi SY, Chang JH, Wee WR, Lee JH. Short-term effects of flurbiprofen and diclofenac on refractive outcome and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23(9):1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80109-5.

29. Wahab SA, Moreira H, Buquera M, Moreira L, Daros AC, Oliveira CS. Experimental investigation of postoperative use of medication in refractive surgery. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005;68(2):223–227. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-27492005000200013.

30. Wolf EJ, Braunstein A, Shih C, Braunstein RE. Incidence of visually significant pseudophakic macular edema after uneventful phacoemulsification in patients treated with nepafenac. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(9):1546–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.018.

31. MaríCotino JF, Suriano MM, De La Cruz Aguiló RI, Vila-Arteaga J. Central toxic keratopathy: a clinical case series. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(6):701–703. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302732.

32. Амиров АН, Астахов СЮ, Беликова ЕИ, Бикбов ММ, Егорова ЕВ, Кожухов АА и др. Катаракта старческая: клинические рекомендации. 2024. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/284_2.

33. Avetisov SE, Tyurina AA, Surnina ZV. Condition of corneal nerve fibers after laser keratorefractive surgery. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2019;135(1):112–116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135011112.

34. Avetisov SE, Tyurina AA, Surnina ZV. State of corneal nerve fibers after laserassisted in situ keratomileusis. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2021;137(3):39–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202113703139.


Review

For citations:


Dovgileva OM, Surnina ZV. A comparative study on the role of nepafenac as a therapy component in patients after Femto-LASIK. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2026;20(5):133-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-132

Views: 212

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)