Radio-frequency electrosurgery as the ultimate choice technology of cervical cancer prevention
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2013-8-81-83
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most common type of cancer among females. In 2008, the diagnosis was a death sentence to 247,883 women. In total, 529,409 new cases were registered, accounting for 13% of the total number of malignant diseases of women globally.
About the Authors
V. E. Radzinskiy
PFUR, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. Yu. Yeremichev
PFUR, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Гинекология: учебник для медицинских вузов / под ред. В.Е. Радзинского. М.: ГЭОТАР–Медиа, 2013.
2. Human Papillomavirus And Related Cancers. WORLD. Summary Report Update. November 15, 2010.
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012.
4. Walboomers J.M., Jacobs M.V., Manos M.M. et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide // J. Pathol. 1999. №189. Р. 12–19.
5. Walboomers J.M., Jacobs M.V., Manos M.M. et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide // J. Pathol. 1999. №189. Р. 12–19.
6. de Sanjose S., Quint W.G., Alemany L. et al. Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study // Lancet Oncol. 2010. №11. Р. 1048–1056.
7. Munoz N., Bosch F.X., de Sanjose S. et al. International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer // N. Engl. J. Med. 2003. №348. Р. 518–527.
8. McCredie M.R., Sharples K.J., Paul C. et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study // Lancet Oncol. 2008. №9. Р. 425–434.
9. Arbyn M., Bergeron C., Klinkhamer P., et al. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. №111. Р. 167–177.
10. Siebers A.G., Klinkhamer P.J., Grefte J.M. et al. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology for detection of cervical cancer precursors: a randomized controlled trial // JAMA. 2009. №302. Р. 1757–1764.
11. Carozzi F.M., Del Mistro A., Confortini M. et al. Reproducibility of HPV DNA testing by Hybrid Capture 2 in a screening setting // Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005. №124. Р. 716–721.
12. Stoler M.H., Castle P.E., Solomon D. et al. American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. The expanded use of HPV testing in gynecologic practice per ASCCP-guided management requires the use of well-validated assays // Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007. №127. Р. 335–337.
13. Kjaer S.K., Frederiksen K., Munk C. et al. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010. №102. Р. 1478–1488.
14. Debbie Saslow and all. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer // Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012. №137. Р. 516–542.
Review
For citations:
Radzinskiy VE, Yeremichev RY. Radio-frequency electrosurgery as the ultimate choice technology of cervical cancer prevention. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2013;(8):81-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2013-8-81-83
Views:
391
Email this article 