Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

ANALYSIS OF CURRENT THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES TO CHRONIC RHINITIS ACCORDING TO THE POLYCLINIC DATA OF AMBULATORY SERVICE OF MOSCOW

https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2017-16-60-67

Abstract

The term «rhinitis» comprises a large heterogeneous group of diseases with different etiology and pathophysiological mechanisms. The latest consensual documents recommend that all rhinitis be classified into 3 main types: infectious, allergic (AR) and non-infectious and non-allergic with subsequent subdivision of each type into separate subtypes. In the Russian Federation, standards and clinical guidelines have been developed only for allergic rhinitis. The therapeutic agement of 779 patients with chronic rhinitis in outpatient settings have been analysed. When formulating the diagnosis, codes J31.0 and J30.0 and the terms «Hypertrophic rhinitis» and «Vasomotor rhinitis» were used for non-allergic rhinitis, while code J30.4 and the terms «Allergic rhinitis» or «Vasomotor-allergic rhinitis» were used for allergic genesis. The diagnosis «Intermittent AR» was indicated once, and severity was mentioned only in 2 patients. In AR group  (216 people), a comprehensive study was performed in 6.5% of cases, the diagnosis was established empirically in 52.7% of cases. Antihistamines were prescribed in 27.3% of cases, intranasal corticosteroids in 77.8%, montelukast in 9.7%, allergen-specific immunotherapy was performed in 1.9%. In non-allergic rhinitis (563 patients), 77.4% intranasal received corticosteroids, 7.5% received antihistamines, 3.7% – montelukast, 4.8% underwent surgical treatment. In both groups, original methods of therapy in the form of local antibiotics, homeopathic drugs, bacterial lysates were reported. In the AR group, a violation of the step-by-step therapy regimen was identified.

About the Authors

E. L. Savlevich
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs of RF
Russian Federation

PhD in medicine.

Moscow



V. S. Kozlov
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs of RF
Russian Federation

MD, Prof.

Moscow



M. A. Zharkikh
Ninth Diagnostic and Treatment Centre of Ministry of Defence of Russia
Russian Federation

Moscow



D. A. Chernyshova
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs of RF
Russian Federation

Moscow



E. A. Ruzakova
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs of RF
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Жолдасбекова А.С., Калматаева Ж.А. Современные подходы к изучению качества жизни в медицине и кардиологии (литературный обзор). Вестник Казахского Национального медицинского университета, 2016, 3: 246-251.

2. Stewart M. Ferguson BJ, Fromer L. Epidemiology and burden of nasal congestion. Dove Press Journal: International Journal of General Medicine, 2010, 3: 37-45.

3. Shedden A. Impact of nasal congestion on quality of life and work productivity in allergic rhinitis: findings from a large online survey. Treat Respir Med, 2005, 4(6): 439–446.

4. Papadopoulos NG, Bernstein JA, Demoly P, Dykewicz M, Fokkens W, Hellings PW. et al. Phenotypes and endotypes of rhinitis and their impact on management: a PRACTALL report. Allergy, 2015, 70(5): 474–94.

5. Hellings PW, Klimek L, Cingi C, Agache I, Akdis C, Bachert C. et al. Non-allergic rhinitis: Position paper of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunologyа. Allergy, 2017 May 5. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.13200/full.

6. Савлевич Е.Л., Бродовская О.Б., Ремизова И.И., Чистякова Г.Н., Ищенко А.М., Симбирцев А.С. Клинико-иммунологическая эффективность применения новой аэрозольной формы рекомбинантного интерферона-α2b в лечении больных с острыми назофарингитами. Цитокины и воспаление, 2010, 9(1): 49-56.

7. Енин И.В. Морфологические изменения слизистой оболочки полости носа и слуховых труб при простудных заболеваниях. Российская ринология, 2007, 2: 6.

8. Samoliński B, Sybilski AJ, Raciborski F, Tomaszewska A, Samel-Kowalik P, Walkiewicz A. et al. Prevalence of rhinitis in Polish population according to the ECAP (Epidemiology of Allergic Disorders in Poland) study. Otolaryngol Pol, 2009, 63(4): 324-330.

9. Schoenwetter WF. Allergic rhinitis: epidemiology and natural history. Allergy Asthma Proc, 2000, 21(1): 1–6.

10. Brożek JL, Bousquet J, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bonini Sergio, Canonica GW, Casale TB et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines: 2010 Revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2010, 126(3): 466–476.

11. Rondón C, Campo P, Galindo L, Blanca-López N, Cassinello MS, Rodriguez-Bada JL. et al. Prevalence and clinical relevance of local allergic rhinitis. Allergy, 2012, 67(10): 1282-1288.

12. Савлевич Е.Л., Бодня О.С. Локальный аллергический ринит. Вопросы и ответы. Альманах клинической медицины, 2016, 44(7): ХХVIII-XXXII.

13. Pinto JM, Jeswani S. Rhinitis in the geriatric population. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2010, 6(1): 10.

14. Georgalas C, Jovancevic L. Gustatory rhinitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 20(1): 9-14.

15. Shusterman D. Nonallergic rhinitis: environmental determinants. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 2016, 36: 379-399.

16. Бабияк В.И., Накатис Я.А. Профессиональные болезни верхних дыхательных путей и уха: руководство для врачей. Под ред. В.И. Бабияка, Я.А. Накатиса. СПб.: Гиппократ, 2009. 696 с.

17. Millas I, Liquidato BM, Buck HdeS, Barros MD, Paes RA, Dolci JE. Evaluation of estrogenic receptors in the nasal mucosa of women taking oral contraceptives. Contraception, 2011, 83: 571-577.

18. Caparroz FA, Gregorio LL, Bongiovanni G, Izu SC, Kosugi EM. Rhinitis and pregnancy: literature review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 82: 105-111.

19. Schroev B, Pien LC. Nonallergic rhinitis: Common problem, chronic symptoms. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 2012, 79(4): 285-293.

20. Федеральные клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению аллергического ринита Российской ассоциации аллергологов и клинических иммунологов. Москва. 2013. 19с.

21. Курбачева О.М., Польнер С.А., Смирнов Д.С. Аллергический ринит. Вечная проблема и ее современное решение. Медицинский совет, 2015, 3: 84-91.

22. Settipane RA. Epidemiology of Vasomotor Rhinitis. World Allergy Organ J, 2009, 2(6): 115–118.

23. Козлов ВС, Савлевич ЕЛ. Полипозный риносинусит. Современные подходы к изучению патогенеза, диагностике и лечению. Вестник оториноларингологии, 2015, 80(4): 95-99.

24. Smith P, Price D, Harvey R, Carney AS, Kritikos V, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ et al. Medication-related costs of rhinitis in Australia: a NostraData cross-sectional study of pharmacy purchases. J Asthma Allergy, 2017, 10: 153–161.

25. Sinclair H, Bond C, Largue G, Price D, Hannaford P. Community pharmacy provision of allergic rhinitis treatments: a longitudinal study of patient reported outcome. Int J Pharm Pract, 2005, 13: 249–256.

26. Nowak M, Brożek G, Doniec Z, OlszaneckaGlinianowicz M. The pharmacotherapy preferred by doctors in treatment of patients diagnosed with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or allergic rhinitis and concomitant diseases: an epidemiological analysis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol, 2017, 34(2): 148–158.


Review

For citations:


Savlevich EL, Kozlov VS, Zharkikh MA, Chernyshova DA, Ruzakova EA. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES TO CHRONIC RHINITIS ACCORDING TO THE POLYCLINIC DATA OF AMBULATORY SERVICE OF MOSCOW. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2017;(16):60-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2017-16-60-67

Views: 781


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)