Children after Caesarean section: how to improve their adaptation and reduce the risk of pathological conditions
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-11-16-22
Abstract
In the article, the authors cite modern data on the frequency of Caesarean section in obstetric practice, report the peculiarities of adaptation of children born by Caesarean section surgery, which is characterized by a high frequency of borderline conditions, pathological loss of body weight, functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, higher morbidity in the subsequent period. In addition, the authors note that mothers of these children are more likely to have hypogalactia, which is largely responsible for impaired adaptation in infants and their transfer to artificial feeding. Referring to the published works, the authors offer various options to improve the process of adaptation in this contingent of children.
About the Authors
I. N. Kholodova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kholodova Irina Nikolaevna – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Speransky Chair of Paediatrics with Outpatient Paediatrics Course
125993, Moscow, Barrikadnaya St., 2/1, b. 1
G. E. Zaidenvarg
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zaidenvarg Galina Evgenyevna – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Speransky Chair of Paediatrics with Outpatient Paediatrics Course
125993, Moscow, Barrikadnaya St., 2/1, b. 1
A. N. Goryainova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Goryainova Aleksandra Nikitichna – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Speransky Chair of Paediatrics with Outpatient Paediatrics Course
125993, Moscow, Barrikadnaya St., 2/1, b. 1
References
1. Radzinskiy V.E., Knyazev S.A. Strong recommendations of WHO on reduction of the share of CW. Status Praesens. 2015;3(26):8-12. (In Russ).
2. Orlova V.S. Modern practice of Caesarean section operation abroad. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Medicina. Farmacija. 2013;23(18):12-18. (In Russ).
3. Allen V.M., Baskett T.F., O’Connell C.M. Contribution of select maternal groups to temporal trends in rates of caesarean section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2010;32(7):633-641.
4. Ananth C.V., Vintzileos A.M. Trends in cesarean delivery for pregnancy and association with perinatal mortality. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;204(6):505-513.
5. Zhang J. et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. 2010;203(4):326-336.
6. Tapisiz O.L. et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital in Ankara, Turkey: a 5-year review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012;286(5):1131 –1134.
7. Boyle A., Reddy U.M., Landy H.J. et al. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;122(1):33-40.
8. Ponomareva Yu.N. Social aspects of Caesarean section. Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2014;4(51):211-217. (In Russ).
9. Ryazanova O.V. Influence of anesthesia at Caesarean section operation on the neurological status of the newborn: author’s abstract of the diss.... cand. of med. sci.: 14.01.20. Saint Petersburg. 2012. С. 22. (In Russ).
10. Strizhakov A.N., Timokhina T.F., Belousova V.S. Is it possible to reduce the frequency of Caesarean section? Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2013;12(3):5-11. (In Russ).
11. Fatkulin I.F., Milova I.A. Principles and methods of reducing blood loss and preventing bleeding during Caesarean section surgery. Prakticheskaja medicina. 2010;4(43):49-51. (In Russ).
12. Markaryan N.M., Golikova T.P., Esipova L.N. Caesarean section. Unresolved issues. Vestnik RUDN. Serija: Medicina. 2016;2:143-149. (In Russ).
13. Kurtser M.A., Latyshkevich O.A., Savelieva G.M. Antenatal diagnostics of placenta growth in women with Caesarean section in anamnesis. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2013;6:3641. (In Russ).
14. Davidov A.I., Podtetenev A.D. Modern view on obstetric peritonitis from the point of view of surgical tactics. Arhiv akusherstva i ginekologii im. V.F. Snegireva. 2014;1(1):44-47. (In Russ).
15. Kukarskaya I.I. Obsetric sepsis as an interdisciplinary problem and a factor in the formation of prerequisites for maternal mortality. Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Medicina. Akusherstvo i ginekologija ». 2011; 6:85-89. (In Russ).
16. Bychkov I.V. The most frequent complications arising during abdominal delivery. Sistemnyj analiz i upravlenie v biomedicinskih sistemah. 2012;11(2):362-369. (In Russ).
17. Kostin I.N. Reserves for reduction of reproductive losses in the Russian Federation: Abstract of the diss. ... dr. of med. sci. М., 2012. 42 с. (In Russ).
18. Verbitskaya M.S. Peculiarities of the course of pregnancy and childbirth in maternity hospitals with postnatal endometritis. Medicinskij zhurnal. 2011;1(35):135-139. (In Russ).
19. Krasnopolskiy V.I., Logutova L.S. Modern concept of childbirth and perinatal mortality. Medicinskij sovet. 2014;9:54-59. (In Russ).
20. Krasnopolsky V.I., Radzinsky V.E., Bashmakova N.V. Preparation of the cervix for programmed delivery. Medical technology. Moscow: Status Praesens mediaburo. 2010. С.16. (In Russ).
21. Radoynova D.D., Kozowski I., Kolew Ya.G. Dangerous for life postnatal bleeding and their clinical significance. Medicinskaja jekspertiza i pravo. 2012;2:43-45. (In Russ).
22. Ilunga P.M., Mukuku O., Mawaw P.M. This casecontrol study of singleton births took place from July to December 2014 in 3 referral maternity units in Lubumbashi. Med Sante Trop. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:1221.
23. Akintayo A.A., Ade-Ojo I.P., Olagbuji B.N. Cesarean section on maternal request: the viewpoint of expectant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Oct 31. [Epub ahead of print].
24. Kholodova I.N., Korotkaya E.V., Klushina T.V. Clinical and microbiological peculiarities of adaptation of newborns born by Caesarean section surgery. Theses of the report at 4 congress of children’s doctors of Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata, 1989:205-206. (In Russ).
25. Deshchekina M.F., Korshunov V.M., Demin V.F., Kholodova I.N., Chernova N.D. Study of intestinal microflora formation in newborn children at joint and separate stay with mother. Pediatrija. 1990;1:13-18. (In Russ).
26. Kholodova I.N. Microflora of the intestines of newborns at various types of delivery and its correction. Author’s abstract of the diss.... cand. of med. sci.: 14.01.20 Moscow. 1990. 26 pp.. (In Russ).
27. Kravchenko V.P. Comparative assessment of the development of children born by Caesarean section and natural childbirth. Pediatricheskaja farmakologija. 2009;6(1):99100. (In Russ).
28. Ippolitova L.I. Features of hormonal adaptation of newborns extracted by Caesarean section surgery. Pediatrija. 2010;89(1):31-36. (In Russ).
29. Gorbachev A.V. The nearest and distant results of the repeated caesarean section. Abstract, 2008. GRNTI 76.29.48. (In Russ).
30. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM Рrotocol №3: Hospital guidelines for the use of supplementary feedings in the healthy term breastfeed neonate. Revised 2009. Breastfeed Med. 2009;4:175-182.
31. Becker G.E., McCormick F.M., Renfrew M.J. Methods of milk expression for lactating women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8(4):CD006170.
32. Ghasemi V., Kheirkhah M, Samani L.N. The effect of herbal tea containing fennel seed on breast milk sufficiency sings and growth parametrs of Iranian infants. Shiraz E Med J. 2014;15:е22262.
33. Bazzano A.N., Hofer R., Thibeau S., Gillispie V., Jacobs M., Theall K.P. A Review of Herbal and Pharmaceutical Galactagogues for BreastFeeding. Herbal and Pharmaceutical Galactagogues. 2016 Winter;16(4):115-124.
34. Kiosov A.F. Support of lactation after premature delivery. Voprosy detskoj dietologii. 2014;12(6):52–56. (In Russ).
35. Akhmadeeva E.N., Amirova V.R., Briukhanova O.A. Features of the microbial landscape of newborns depending on the method of delivery. Rossijskij vestnik perinatologii i pediatrii. 2006;5:19-21. (In Russ).
36. Backhed F., Roswall G., Peng Y., Feng Q., Jia H., Kovatcheva-Datchary P. Dinamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiom during the fist year of live. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):690-73.
37. National program of optimization of feeding of children of the first year of life in the Russian Federation. Union of Pediatricians of Russia, National Association of Nutritionists and Nutritionists, GU «NMITS health of children», GU Research Institute of Nutrition of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 2011. 68 с. (In Russ).
38. Report of joint FAO/WHO Еxpert consultation on evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probioties in food including power milk with like lactis acid bacteria. Cordoba, Argentina. 2001. 34 p.
39. Sannikova N.E., Borodulina T.V., Nikitin S.V., Sokolova N.S. The role of functional components of adapted milk mixtures in the correction of digestive tract disorders in children born by caesarean section. Lechashhij vrach. 2016 November;11. (In Russ).
40. «Technical Regulations of the Customs Union on the Safety of Milk and Dairy Products TR TS-033-20-13. http:webportalsrv.gost. (In Russ).
41. Elkina T.N., Surovikina E.A. Efficiency of various combinations of sour-milk and fresh adapted mixtures at babies of the first half year of life on artificial feeding. Lechashhij vrach. January 2018;1:2-7. (In Russ).
42. Baklushina E.K., Boboshko I.E., Balakireva A.V. Influence of perinatal risk factors on fetal development and newborn health. Vestnik Ivanovskoj medicinskoj akademii. 2014;19(1):19. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Kholodova IN, Zaidenvarg GE, Goryainova AN. Children after Caesarean section: how to improve their adaptation and reduce the risk of pathological conditions. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2019;(11):16-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-11-16-22
Views:
2031
Email this article 