Intrauterine hormonal system: impact on the quality of life
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2015-17-132-135
Abstract
The article tells about the results of the most challenging studies and prospects for LNG-IUS in gynecology. The quality of life of women using LNG-IUS is evaluated. The use of LNG-IUS increases both physical and psychological well-being of women.
About the Authors
V. N. Prilepskaya
Scientific center for obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology named V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. М. Nazarova
Scientific center for obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology named V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. N. Stenyaeva
Scientific center for obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology named V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. G. Sycheva
Scientific center for obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology named V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Руководство по контрацепции. Под ред. проф. В.Н. Прилепской. 2-е изд. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2010: 26-296.
2. Иванова Е.В., Сасунова Р.А., Летуновская В.Н., Прилепская В.Н., Межевитинова Е.А., Тагиева А.В. Внутриматочная гормональная система: Вопросы приемлемости и безопасности. Акушерство и гинекология. 2011. 4: 141-143.
3. Медицинские критерии приемлемости применения средств контрацепции. 3-е изд. Женева: ВОЗ, 2007.
4. Чернуха ПЕ., Шигорева Т.В., Могиревская О.А., Силакова А.В., Касян В.Н. Экспрессия рецепторов к половым стеройдным гормонам и клеточная пролиферация при различных формах гиперплазии эндометрия. Влияние внутриматочной левонергестрел-рилизинг-системы. Акушерство и гинекология. 2011. 6: 64-69.
5. Чернуха ПЕ., Могиревская О.А., Шигорева Т.В., Грибанова Н.Д. Клинико-морфологические аспекты внутриматочного воздействия левоноргестрела при гиперплазии эндометрия. Акушерство и гинекология. 2011. 4: 6-62.
6. Тарасова М.А., Шаповалова К.А. Фертильность после отмены гормональной контрацепции. Акушерство и гинекология. 2014. 7: 84-88.
7. Backman T, HuhtaLa S, Luoto R et al. Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002. 99(4): 608-613.
8. Say R, Mansour D. Contraceptive choice for young people. J. Fam.Plann. Reprod. Hlth Care. 2009. 35(2): 81-85.
9. Comez MKO, Rosa-e-Silva JC, Carcia SB et al. Effects of the Levonorgestrel -releasing intrauterine system on cell proliferation, Fas expression and steroid receptors in endometriosis lesions and normal endo-metrium. Hum. Reprod. 2009. 24(11): 2736-2745.
10. Skrzypulec V, Drosdzol A. Evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning of women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive system-Mirena. Coll Antropol. 2008. 32: 1059-1068.
11. Heliovaara-Peippo S, Hurskainen R, Teperi J et al. Quality of life and costs of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagia: a 10-year randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013. 209(6): 535-614.
12. Bastianelli C, Farris M, Benagiano G. Use of the levonorgestrel-releas-ing intrauterine system, quality of life and sexuality. Experience in an Italian family planning center. Contraception. 2011. 84(4): 402-408.
13. Vercellini P. A levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a pilot study. Fertil. Steril., 1999. 72: 505-508.
14. Park DS, Kim ML, Song T et al. Clinical experiences of the levonorg-estrel-releasing intrauterine system in patients with large symptomatic adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. 54(4): 412-415.
15. Schindler AE, Campagnoli C, Druckmann R et al. Aspects of progestin activity on the breast. Maturitas. 1998. 29(1): 61-65.
Review
For citations:
Prilepskaya VN, Nazarova NМ, Stenyaeva NN, Sycheva EG. Intrauterine hormonal system: impact on the quality of life. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2015;(17):132-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2015-17-132-135
Views:
417
Email this article 