Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Rational approach to the treatment of EGFR-positive lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-19-51-56

Abstract

Molecularly targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has been recognized as the optimal treatment option for patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, 5 drugs of this group are available: first generation – erlotinib and gefitinib, second generation – afatinib and dacomitinib (not registered in Russia), and third generation – osimertinib. The drugs have some peculiarities, this refers to their antitumor activity, safety profile, and resistance mechanisms. Knowledge of these differences is necessary to determine a rational treatment plan. Gefitinib and erlotinib increase the time before progression compared to standard chemotherapy, but do not affect the overall survival rate. Afatinib significantly increases the time before progression, and in the cohort of patients with deletion in the 19th exon – the overall survival rate. Dacomitinib was more effective than gefitinib in terms of time before progression and total survival. On average, the disease progresses after a year and a half of successful treatment. The dominant mechanism of resistance development to TKI of the first and second generation consists in accumulation of mutation of the gatekeeper gene T790M. Most often it is determined in patients with deletion in the 19th exon (Del19). Osimertinib has proved to be effective against tumors not only with activating mutations, but also with T790M resistance mutation, and with minimal activity to EGFR «wild» type receptors. The first indication that it was registered was progression on targeted therapy with first and second generation drugs caused by the secondary mutation of T790M. Later, the advantage of osimertinib compared to gefitinib/erlotinib in untreated EGFR-positive patients was proved. Thus, there are at least two main options for treatment tactics: the consistent use of second and third generation drugs or prescription of osimertinib in the first line with subsequent chemotherapy. Evaluation and consideration of known prognostic factors will allow choosing the optimal tactics for a particular patient.

About the Authors

E. V. Reutova
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Cand. of Sci. (Med), Senior Researcher

23, Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, 115478, Russia



K. K. Laktionov
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Dr. of Sci. (Med), Professor, Head of the Department of Chemotherapy No.1 of the Thoraco-Abdominal Department

23, Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, 115478, Russia



D. I. Yudin
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Cand. of Sci. (Med), Senior Researcher

23, Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, 115478, Russia



M. S. Ardzinba
Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Cand. of Sci. (Med), Oncologist, Oncological Department of Medicinal Methods of Treatment No. 17 (chemotherapeutic)

23, Kashirskoye sh., Moscow, 115478, Russia



References

1. Tjulandin S., Imyanitov E., Moiseyenko V., Ponomarenko D., Gurina L., Koroleva I., Karaseva V. Prospective cohort study of clinical characteristics and management patterns for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in the Russian Federation: EPICLIN-Lung. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(6):1117-27. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1036015.

2. Laktionov K.K., Artamonova E.V., Breder V.V., et al. Practical recommendations of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology. Medication for non-small cell lung cancer. Zlokachestvenny opuholy = Malignant tumors. 2018;8(3s2):30–46. doi: 10.18027/2224–5057–2018–8–3s2–30–46.

3. Marshall J. Clinical implications of the mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Cancer. 2006;107(6):1207-1218. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22133.

4. Lee C.K., Davies L., Wu Y.L., Mitsudomi T. Gefitinib or Erlotinib vs Chemotherapy for EGFR Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Overall Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(6). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw279.

5. Hirsh V. Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(3):126-138. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i3.877.

6. Yang J.C., Wu Y.L., Schuler M., et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUXLung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):141–151. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8.

7. Urata Y., Katakami N., Morita S, et al. Randomized phase III study compar.ing gefitinib with erlotinib in patients with previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma: WJOG 5108L. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(27):3248–3257. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4154.

8. Yang J.J., Zhou Q., Yan H.H., et al. A phase III randomised controlled trial of erlotinib vs gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(5):568–574. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.456.

9. Paz-Ares L., Tan E.H., O’Byrne K., et al. Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutationpositive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(2):270–277. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw611.

10. Park K., Tan E.H., O’Byrne K., et al. Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, openlabel, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(5):577–589. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30033-X.

11. Wu Y.L., Cheng Y., Zhou X., et al. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive nonsmall-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised,open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(11):1454–1466. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30608-3.

12. Mok T.S., Cheng Y., Zhou X. et al. Improvement in Overall Survival in a Randomized Study That Compared Dacomitinib With Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR-Activating Mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2244-2250. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.7994.

13. Arcila M.E., Oxnard G.R., Nafa K., et al. Rebiopsy of lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors and enhanced detection of the T790M mutation using a locked nucleic acid-based assay. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(5):1169-1180. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2277.

14. Pao W., Miller V.A., Politi K.A., et al. Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med. 2005;2(3):e73. doi: 0.1371/journal.pmed.0020073.

15. Sequist L.V., Waltman B.A., Dias-Santagata D., et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(75):75ra26.19. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003.

16. Yang J.C., Ahn M.J., Kim D.W., et al. Osimertinib in pretreated T790M-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer: AURA study phase II extension component. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(12):1288–1296. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3223.

17. Jenkins S., Chih-Hsin Yang J., Jänne P.A. et al. EGFR Mutation Analysis for Prospective Patient Selection in Two Phase II Registration Studies of Osimertinib. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2017;12(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.05.002.

18. Janne P.A., Yang J.C., Kim D.W., et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(18):1689–1699. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411817.

19. Mok T.S., Wu Y.L., Ahn M.J., et al. Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):629–640. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612674.

20. Huang W.L., Chen Y.L., Yang S.C. et al. Liquid biopsy genotyping in lung cancer: ready for clinical utility? Oncotarget. 2017;8(11):18590-18608. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14613.

21. Oxnard G.R., Thress K.S., Alden R.S. et al. Association between plasma genotyping and outcomes of treatment with osimertinib (AZD9291) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(28):3375-3382. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7162.

22. Ahn M., Han J., Tsai C. et al. Detection of EGFR mutations from plasma ctDNA in the osimertinib Phase III trial (AURA3): comparison of three plasma assays. Presented at: IASLC 18th World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC). Yokohama, Japan, October 15–18, 2017. Available at: https://wclc2019.iaslc.org › WCLC2019-Abstract-Book_web-friendly.

23. Yu H.A., Arcila M.E., Rekhtman N. et al. Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):2240-2247. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2246.

24. Soria J.C., Ohe Y., Vansteenkiste J., et al. Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):113-125. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713137.

25. Thress K.S., Paweletz C.P., Felip E., et al. Acquired EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to AZD9291 in non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M. Nat Med. 2015;21(6):560–562. doi: 10.1038/nm.3854

26. Niederst M.J., Hu H., Mulvey H.E. et al. The allelic context of the C797S mutation acquired upon treatment with third-generation EGFR inhibitors impacts sensitivity to subsequent treatment strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(17):3924-33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0560.

27. Wang Z., Yang J.J., Huang J. et al. Lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR T790M and in trans C797S responds to combination therapy of first- and third-generation EGFR TKIs and shifts allelic configuration at resistance. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(11):1723-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.06.017.

28. Ortiz-Cuaran S, Scheffler M, Plenker D et al. Heterogeneous mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(19):4837-4847. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1915.

29. Santarpia M., Liguori A., Karachaliou N. et al. Osimertinib in the treatment of non-smallcell lung cancer: design, development and place in therapy. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017;8:109–125. doi: Santarpia M., Liguori A., Karachaliou N. et al. Osimertinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: design, development and place in therapy. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017;8:109–125. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S119644.

30. Hochmair M.J., Morabito A., Hao D. et al. Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of the observational GioTag study. Future Oncol. 2019;15(25):2905-2914. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0711.

31. Hendriks L.E., Smit E.F., Vosse B.A. et al. EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients: more prone to development of bone and brain metastases? Lung Cancer. 2014;84(1):86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.006.

32. Iuchi T., Shingyoji M., Sakaida T., Hatano K., Nagano O., Itakura M., et al. Phase II trial of gefitinib alone without radiation therapy for Japanese patients with brain metastases from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2013;82(2):282-287. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.08.016.

33. Park S.J., Kim H.T., Lee D.H. et al. Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring either exon 19 or 21 mutation. Lung Cancer. 2012;77(3):556–560. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.05.092

34. Yang J.C.H., Wu Y.-L., Hirsh V. et al. 143PD Competing central nervous system or systemic progression analysis for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC receiving afatinib in LUX-Lung 3, 6, and 7. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2018;13(4):S84-S85. doi: 10.1016/S1556-0864(18)30417-9.


Review

For citations:


Reutova EV, Laktionov KK, Yudin DI, Ardzinba MS. Rational approach to the treatment of EGFR-positive lung cancer. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2019;(19):51-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-19-51-56

Views: 926


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)