Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Gynecological emergencies under the guise of surgical pathology

https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-147

Abstract

Introduction. One of the actual problems of urgent gynecology is diseases included in the symptom complex “acute abdomen”, because today there are no algorithms for examining this cohort of patients of reproductive age, and existing clinical guidelines explain only part of the diagnostic standards of individual groups.

Aim. To improve diagnostic criteria and optimize tactics for managing patients with the symptom complex acute abdomen in order to preserve reproductive function.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 785 emergency laparoscopic surgeries performed from 2017 to 2020 was carried out at one of the clinical sites of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, RNIMU named after N.I. Pirogov. A comparison of preand postoperative diagnoses, an analysis of diagnostic algorithms, and treatment outcomes of patients with suspected acute abdomen were carried out. The role of laparoscopy as a highly informative method of differential diagnosis in the presence of the symptom complex acute abdomen is shown.

Results. Based on the conducted retrospective analysis, an algorithm for managing female patients of reproductive age with the symptom complex acute abdomen was developed: at the first stage, it includes a diagnostic search with a decision on the need for emergency surgical treatment, mandatory joint examination by a surgeon and an obstetrician-gynecologist. At the second stage, in case of choosing a conservative management tactic, patients need to undergo extended clinical and laboratory diagnostics, determine the effectiveness of the therapy, and, if necessary, set indications for delayed surgical treatment.

Conclusions. Thus, only improving the quality of differential diagnostics, including instrumental research methods, will help avoid unnecessary surgical aggression, which will ultimately lead to the preservation and implementation of reproductive function in female patients of reproductive age.

About the Authors

Ju. E. Dobrokhotova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Julia E. Dobrokhotova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Honoured Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997



A. A. Shchegolev
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr A. Shchegolev, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Pediatric Faculty

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997



A. E. Markarov
Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
Russian Federation

Arnold E. Markarov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Chief Medical Officer

1, Fortunatovskaya St., Moscow, 105187



T. S. Kotomina
Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
Russian Federation

Tatiana S. Kotomina, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Obstetrics and Gynecology Care

1, Fortunatovskaya St., Moscow, 105187



S. A. Khlynova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
Russian Federation

Svetlana A. Khlynova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997,

1, Fortunatovskaya St., Moscow, 105187



E. A. Markova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
Russian Federation

Eleonora A. Markova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997,

1, Fortunatovskaya St., Moscow, 105187



O. A. Slyusareva
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow
Russian Federation

Olga A. Slyusareva, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Inozemtsev City Clinical Hospital of the Department of Health of Moscow; ssistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

1, Fortunatovskaya St., Moscow, 105187,

1, Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997



References

1. Доброхотова ЮЭ (ред.). Клинические лекции по акушерству и гинекологии. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2009. 312 с.

2. Хайбуллина АР, Сахаутдинова ИВ, Кулешова ТП, Зулкарнеева ЭМ, Муслимова СЮ, Таюпова ИМ. Острый живот в гинекологии. Уфа: Изд-во БашНИПИнефть; 2014. 56 с. Режим доступа: https://library.bashgmu.ru/elibdoc/elib620.pdf.

3. Макаров ОВ (ред.). Гинекология. Клинические лекции. М.: ГЭОТАР Медиа; 2010. 352 с.

4. Cubro H, Cengic V, Burina N, Kravic Z, Beciragic E, Vranic S. Mucocele of the appendix presenting as an exacerbated chronic tubo-ovarian abscess: A case report and comprehensive review of the literature. Medicine. 2019;98(39):e17149. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017149.

5. Argentino GLS, Bueloni-Dias FN, Leite NJ, Peres GF, Elias LV, Bortolani VC et al. The role of laparoscopy in the propaedeutics of gynecological diagnosis1. Acta Cir Bras. 2019;34(1):e20190010000010. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190010000010.

6. Al Ali M, Jabbour S, Alrajaby S. ACUTE ABDOMEN systemic sonographic approach to acute abdomen in emergency department: a case series. Ultrasound J. 2019;11(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0136-5.

7. Ciebiera M, Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak A, Zaręba K, Jakiel G. Heterotopic pregnancy – how easily you can go wrong in diagnosing? A case study. J Ultrason. 2018;18(75):355–358. https://doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0052.

8. Sayan CD, Yeral MI, Ozkan ZS, Karaca G, Asal N, Aydın O, Sagsoz N. Sigmoid Colon Perforation Mimics a Tuboovarian Absces. Med Arch. 2018;72(2):151–153. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2018.72.151-153.

9. Minnullin RI, Ruhljada NN, Miroshnichenko AG, Solovev IA, Alimov RR. Analysis of conventional diagnostic technology for acute surgical diseases of abdomen and pelvis in women of reproductive age delivered during the prehospital and inpatient phases of emergency medical care. Emergency Medical Care. 2014;15(3):51–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/2072-6716-2014-15-3-51-56.

10. Liu H, Ge YX, Xiang YJ, Zhang XL. Gynecological acute abdomen in patients age under 18: an analysis of 237 cases. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;53(5):304–307. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.05.004.

11. Адамян ЛВ, Артымук НВ, Беженарь ВФ, Белокринницкая ТЕ, Доброхотова ЮЭ, Киселев СИ и др. Внематочная (эктопическая) беременность: клинические рекомендации. 2024. Режим доступа: https://g-academy.ru/sites/default/files/2024-12/cr_4.pdf.

12. Адамян ЛВ, Андреева ЕН, Артымук НВ, Белокринницкая ТЕ, Беженарь ВФ, Сутурина ЛВ и др. Воспалительные болезни женских тазовых органов: клинические рекомендации. 2024. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/643_2.

13. Flasar MH, Goldberg E. Acute abdominal pain. Med Clin North Am. 2006;90(3):481–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2005.11.005.

14. Petlakh V, Konovalov A, Konstantinova I, Sergeyev A, Belyaeva O. Diagnosis and treatment of gynecological diseases in a pediatric surgeon’s practice. Vrach. 2012;(1):3–7. (In Russ.) Available at: https://pulmo.rusvrach.ru/archive/vrach-2012-01-02.pdf.

15. Grundmann RT, Petersen M, Lippert H, Meyer F. The acute (surgical) abdomen – epidemiology, diagnosis and general principles of management. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48(6):696–706. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245303.

16. Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Tazuma S, Furukawa A, Nishii O, Shigematsu K et al. The Practice Guidelines for Primary Care of Acute Abdomen 2015. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34(1):80–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0489-z.

17. Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD006583. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub2.

18. Angioli R, Terranova C, De Cicco Nardone C, Cafà EV, Damiani P, Portuesi R et al. A comparison of three different entry techniques in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171(2):339–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.012.

19. Ietto G, Amico F, Pettinato G, Iori V, Carcano G. Laparoscopy in Emergency: Why Not? Advantages of Laparoscopy in Major Emergency: A Review. Life. 2021;11(9):917. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11090917.

20. Bokemeyer A, Ochs K, Fuhrmann V. Acute Abdomen: Diagnostic Management. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020;145(21):1544–1551. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1007-4264.

21. Cooke CM, Macdonald DB, Singh SS. Acute Abdominal Pain in a Postmenopausal Woman. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(11):1049–1050. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2016.

22. Snegirev II, Frolov AP, Zelov IA. The mistakes in diagnostics of acute appendicitis and acute abdominal diseases of genitals in women. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2007;(2):27–29. (In Russ.) Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/oshibki-v-diagnostike-ostrogoappenditsita-i-ostryh-abdominalnyh-zabolevaniy-genitaliy-u-zhenschin.

23. Samsonov VT, Ermolov AS, Guliaev AA, Yartsev PA, Abdulamitov KhK, Sattarova ZI. Videolaparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of diseases simulating acute appendicitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2017;(6):22–27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2017622-27.


Review

For citations:


Dobrokhotova JE, Shchegolev AA, Markarov AE, Kotomina TS, Khlynova SA, Markova EA, Slyusareva OA. Gynecological emergencies under the guise of surgical pathology. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(4):60-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-147

Views: 82


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)