Preview

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council

Advanced search

Semaglutide: Multilevel organ protection in type 2 diabetes – from the heart and kidneys to peripheral vessels

https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-475

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most burning issues in modern medicine. Its prevalence is growing at an alarming rate. In the Russian Federation, DM is registered in 3.5% of the population. Of these, the vast majority of people have type 2 diabetes. Today, most physicians give preference to glucose lowering medications with a high safety profile, a low risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain, and the ability to provide organ protection effect and reduce the risk of late complications. This group includes incretin-based drugs, primarily glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). And first of all, it concerns long-acting GLP-1RAs, in particular semaglutide. Semaglutide allows most patients with diabetes to achieve target blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels, and also to significantly reduce body weight without causing hypoglycemia, either alone or with other glucose lowering medications and insulin. The numerous clinical studies have convincingly demonstrated that semaglutide has a broad spectrum of cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects, favourably affects inflammation and atherogenesis, and reduces the risk of progression of lower limb arterial diseases. According to the current clinical guidelines, the priority disease-modifying approach to the treatment should include GLP-1RAs or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitors) in the treatment regimens. If target blood glucose levels have been previously achieved using other glucose lowering drugs, switching the patient to medications with proven benefits (GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2 inhibitors) by replacing prior drugs could be considered. Insudive® (semaglutide, solution for subcutaneous injection) that has been recently approved for marketing demonstrated similar safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles to the reference product Ozempic®, according to the results of the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study.

About the Author

M. G. Pavlova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Россия

Maria G. Pavlova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Endocrinology No. 1, Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine

8, Bldg. 2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991, Russia



References

1. Дедов ИИ, Шестакова МВ, Сухарева ОЮ. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. 12-й выпуск. М.; 2025. 247 с. Режим доступа: https://www.endocrincentr.ru/sites/default/files/all/specialists/algoritmy_specializirovannoy_medicinskoi_pomoschi_bolnym_sd_2025.pdf.

2. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Vikulova OK,Zheleznyakova AV, Isakov MA, Kutakova DV, Mokrysheva NG. Epidemiology and key clinical and therapeutic indicators of diabetes mellitus in Russian Federation according to the World Health Organization’s strategy goals. Diabetes Mellitus. 2025;28(1):4–17.(In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13292.

3. Dedov II, Shestakova MV, Galstyan GR. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the adult population of Russia (NATION study). Diabetes Mellitus. 2016;19(2):104–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM2004116-17.

4. Deacon CF, Nauck MA, Toft-Nielsen M, Pridal L, Willms B, Holst JJ. Both subcutaneously and intravenously administered glucagon-like peptide I are rapidly degraded from the NH2-terminus in type II diabetic patients and in healthy subjects. Diabetes. 1995;44(9):1126–1131. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.44.9.1126.

5. Ahrén B, Simonsson E, Larsson H, Landin-Olsson M, Torgeirsson H, Jansson PA et al. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV improves metabolic control over a 4-week study period in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(5):869–875. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.5.869.

6. Shestakova EA, Galstian GR. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: Comparative analysis of members of the group. Problemy Endokrinologii. 2012;58(1):61–66. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/problemy-endokrinologii/2012/1/030375-96602012110.

7. Дедов ИИ, Шестакова МВ. Инкретины: новая веха в лечении СД 2 типа. М.: Дипак; 2010. 92 с.

8. Salukhov VV, Galstyan GR, Khalimov IS, Bakulin IG, Cherkashin DV, Shadrichev FE, Sukhotskaia NA. Practical application of semaglutide: From evidence-based research to expert decisions. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2025;(6):14–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-185.

9. Theilade S, Christensen MB, Vilsbøll T, Knop FK.An overview of obesity mechanisms in humans: Endocrine regulation of food intake, eating behaviour and common determinants of body weight. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(Suppl. 1):17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14270.

10. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–986. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.

11. Giblett JP,Axell RG, White PA, Clarke SJ, McCormick L, Read PA et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 derived cardioprotection does not utilize a KATP-channel dependent pathway: mechanistic insights from human supply and demand ischemia studies. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0416-3.

12. Nyström T, Gutniak MK,Zhang Q,Zhang F, Holst JJ,Ahrén B, Sjöholm A. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients with stable coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;287(6):E1209–E1215. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00237.2004.

13. Mkrtumyan AM, Egshatyan LV. Efficacy of semaglutide: an evidence-based review. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2023;(6):264–273. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2022-010.

14. Cabou C, Campistron G, Marsollier N, Leloup C, Cruciani-Guglielmacci C, Pénicaud L et al. Brain glucagon-like peptide-1 regulates arterial blood flow, heart rate, and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes. 2008;57(10):2577–2587. https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-0121.

15. Aldiss P, Davies G, Woods R, Budge H, Sacks HS, Symonds ME. ‘Browning’ the cardiac and peri-vascular adipose tissues to modulate cardiovascular risk. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.074.

16. Skov J, Dejgaard A, Frøkiær J, Holst JJ, Jonassen T, Rittig S, Christiansen JS. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1): effect on kidney hemodynamics and reninangiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):E664–E671. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3855.

17. Muskiet MH, Tonneijck L, Smits MM, Kramer MH, Diamant M, Joles JA, van Raalte DH Acute renal haemodynamic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide in healthy overweight men. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(2):178–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12601.

18. Thomas MC. The potential and pitfalls of GLP-1 receptor agonists for renal protection in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2017;43(Suppl 1):2S20–2S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1262-3636(17)30069-1.

19. Farah LX, Valentini V, Pessoa TD, Malnic G, McDonough AA, Girardi AC. The physiological role of glucagon-like peptide-1 in the regulation of renal function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;310(2):F123–F127. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00394.2015.

20. Shamkhalova MS, Sklyanik IA, Shestakova MV. Nephroprotective potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Mellitus. 2020;23(1):56–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12379.

21. Lee YS, Jun HS.Anti-Inflammatory Effects of GLP-1-Based Therapies beyond Glucose Control. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:3094642. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3094642.

22. Deb DK, Bao R, Li YC. Critical role of the cAMP-PKA pathway in hyperglycemiainduced epigenetic activation of fibrogenic program in the kidney. FASEB J. 2017;31(5):2065–2075. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201601116R.

23. Lau J, Bloch P, Schäffer L, Pettersson I, Spetzler J, Kofoed J et al. Discovery of the Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogue Semaglutide. J Med Chem. 2015;58(18):7370–7380. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00726.

24. Sorli C, Harashima SI, Tsoukas GM, Unger J, Karsbøl JD, Hansen T, Bain SC. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebocontrolled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(4):251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30013-X.

25. Ahrén B, Masmiquel L, Kumar H, Sargin M, Karsbøl JD, Jacobsen SH, Chow F. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):341–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30092-X.

26. Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I et al. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):258–266. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0417.

27. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, Piletič M, Rose L,Axelsen M et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(5):355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30085-2.

28. Rodbard HW, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D et al. Semaglutide Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(6):2291–2301. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00070.

29. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834–1844. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141.

30. Pratley RE,Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Lüdemann J,Andreassen C, Navarria A et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X.

31. Lingvay I, Catarig AM, Frias JP, Kumar H, Lausvig NL, le Roux CW et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus daily canagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 8): a double-blind, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(11):834–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30311-0.

32. Zinman B, Bhosekar V, Busch R, Holst I, Ludvik B, Thielke D et al. Semaglutide once weekly as add-on to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 9): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(5):356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30066-X.

33. Capehorn MS, Catarig AM, Furberg JK, Janez A, Price HC, Tadayon S et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0mg vs once-daily liraglutide 1.2 mg as add-on to 1–3 oral antidiabetic drugs in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 10). Diabetes Metab. 2020;46(2):100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2019.101117.

34. Shabutdinova OR, Dautov AR, Samkov AA, Kononenko AV, Sargaliev AF, Davletshin AR et al. Semaglutide – effectiveness in weight loss and side effects when used according to studies by SUSTAIN, PIONEER, STEP. Problemy Endokrinologii. 2023;69(3):68–82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13197.

35. Chun JH, Butts A. Long-acting GLP-1RAs: An overview of efficacy, safety, and their role in type 2 diabetes management. JAAPA. 2020;33(8):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000669456.13763.bd.

36. Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Furtado RHM et al. Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circulation. 2019;139(17): 2022–2031. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038868.

37. Tuttle KR, Bosch-Traberg H, Cherney DZI, Hadjadj S, Lawson J, Mosenzon O et al. Post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 trials suggests that people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk treated with semaglutide experience more stable kidney function compared with placebo. Kidney Int. 2023;103(4):77–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.12.028.

38. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3.

39. Bain SC, Belmar N, Hoff ST, Husain M, Rasmussen S, Vilsbøll T, Petrie MC. Cardiovascular, Metabolic, and Safety Outcomes with Semaglutide by Baseline Age: Post Hoc Analysis of SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6. Diabetes Ther. 2025;16(1):15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-024-01659-7.

40. Shamkhalova MS, Sukhareva OY, Martynov SA, Severina AS, Vikulova OK, Trubitsyna NP et al. Chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: new challenges. Diabetes Mellitus. 2025;28(1):46–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/DM13268.

41. Gragnano F, De Sio V, Calabrò P. FLOW trial stopped early due to evidence of renal protection with semaglutide. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024;10(1):7–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad080.

42. Bonaca MP, Catarig AM, Houlind K, Ludvik B, Nordanstig J, Ramesh CK et al. Semaglutide and walking capacity in people with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and type 2 diabetes (STRIDE): a phase 3b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2025;405(10489):1580–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00509-4.

43. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes–2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(Suppl. 1):S27–S49. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S002.

44. Davies MJ,Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022.A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2022;65(12):1925–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2.

45. Shi FH, Li H, Cui M,Zhang ZL, Gu ZC, Liu XY. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00576.


Review

For citations:


Pavlova MG. Semaglutide: Multilevel organ protection in type 2 diabetes – from the heart and kidneys to peripheral vessels. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(16):119–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-475

Views: 160

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-701X (Print)
ISSN 2658-5790 (Online)