Prediction of preeclampsia in pregnant women with comorbid conditions
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-119
Abstract
Introduction. Preeclampsia is a serious complication of pregnancy and one of the main causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. It is important to identify women at high risk of developing preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy in order to provide timely therapeutic intervention. At the moment, there is no significant progress in predicting and preventing this complication of pregnancy.
Aim. To predict the occurrence of preeclampsia in pregnant women with comorbidity.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the exchange cards and birth histories of 158 residents of the Stavropol Territory was conducted. The study was conducted on the basis of the Stavropol Regional Clinical Perinatal Center in Stavropol, Stavropol Territory. Pregnant women (n = 158) were divided into three groups: the first group (n = 58) – pregnant women with overweight or obesity; group 2 (n = 70) – pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia and overweight or obesity; group 3 (n = 60) – pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia and normal body weight.
Results. Pregnant women with obesity and anemia had a higher risk of vulvovaginal candidiasis (χ2 = 8.015, p = 0.019), premature birth (χ2 = 7.431, p = 0.025) and preeclampsia (χ2 = 6.456, p = 0.040). For obese pregnant women, the most significant factors in the prognosis of preeclampsia were: the first pregnancy, the APTT level in the third trimester. For pregnant women with IDA, factors predicting the development of preeclampsia: first pregnancy, smoking, hemoglobin levels in the first trimester. For pregnant women with obesity and IDA, the prognostic criteria for preeclampsia were: the first pregnancy, and the indicator of thrombin time in the third trimester.
Conclusions. The identification of prognostic criteria for individual risk factors for preeclampsia makes it possible to more accurately assess the likelihood of preeclampsia and timely resolve the issue of prevention and initiation of therapy and contribute to the elimination of modifiable risk factors for preeclampsia, such as obesity and anemia.
About the Authors
D. B. RudenkoRussian Federation
Daria B. Rudenko, Candidate of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the Course of Perinatology
6, Miklukho-Maklai St., Moscow, 117198
A. V. Solovyeva
Russian Federation
Alina V. Solovyeva, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the Course of Perinatology
6, Miklukho-Maklai St., Moscow, 117198
M. A. Spitsyna
Russian Federation
Maria A. Spitsyna, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the Course of Perinatology
6, Miklukho-Maklai St., Moscow, 117198
D. S. Mamchich
Russian Federation
Daria S. Mamchich, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the Course of Perinatology
6, Miklukho-Maklai St., Moscow, 117198
References
1. Roberts JM. Preeclampsia epidemiology(ies) and pathophysiology(ies). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;94:102480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102480.
2. Traub A, Sharma A, Gongora MC. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Literature Review – Pathophysiology, Current Management, Future Perspectives, and Healthcare Disparities. US Cardiol. 2024;18:e03. https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2023.01.
3. Lee NMW, Chaemsaithong P, Poon LC. Prediction of preeclampsia in asymptomatic women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;92:102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102436.
4. Ayyash MK, McLaren RJr, Shaman M, Al-Kouatly HB. Trends in Preeclampsia Risk Factors in the US From 2010 to 2021. JAMA. 2024;332(2):167–169. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.8931.
5. Savelyeva IV, Bukharova EA, Nosova NV, Prodanchuk EG, Tsygankova OYu, Kuklina LV. Role of obesity and overweight in preeclampsia. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya (Russian Federation). 2022;(5):59–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.5.59-64
6. Monteith AJ, Skaar EP. The impact of metal availability on immune function during infection. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2021;32(11):916–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2021.08.004.
7. Hasparian KA, Kondratiuk VK, Trokhymovych OV, Kondratiuk KO, Nikitina IM, Ponomarova IG. Intestinal microflora on the background of bacterial vaginosis on vulvovaginal candidiasis in overweight and obese women. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(10 Pt. 1):2482–2488. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34897009.
8. Allen NG, Edupuganti L, Edwards DJ, Jimenez NR, Buck GA, Jefferson KK, Strauss JF 3rd; Vaginal Microbiome Consortium; Wickham EP 3rd, Fettweis JM. The vaginal microbiome in women of reproductive age with healthy weight versus overweight/obesity. Obesity. 2022;30(1):142–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23306.
9. Sun Y, Shen ZZ, Huang FL, Jiang Y, Wang YW, Zhang SH et al. Association of gestational anemia with pregnancy conditions and outcomes: A nested case-control study. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(27):8008–8019. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8008.
10. Tunkyi K, Moodley J. Anemia and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(19):2594–2598. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1349746.
11. Nguyen HY, Park B, Rossi J, Tse B, Cryer A, Yao R. Impact of maternal obesity on preterm delivery in patients with cervical cerclage. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023;3(2):100211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100211.
12. Shirvanifar M, Ahlqvist VH, Lundberg M, Kosidou K, Herraiz-Adillo Á, Berglind D et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable to overweight and obesity across maternal birth regions: a Swedish population-based cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(10):e776–e786. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00188-9.
13. Paulo MS, Abdo NM, Bettencourt-Silva R, Al-Rifai RH. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:691033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.691033.
14. Tiongco RE, Arceo E, Clemente B, Pineda-Cortel MR. Association of maternal iron deficiency anemia with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4932-0.
15. MacDonald TM, Walker SP, Hannan NJ, Tong S, Kaitu’u-Lino TJ. Clinical tools and biomarkers to predict preeclampsia. EBioMedicine. 2022;75:103780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103780.
16. Roberts JM, Rich-Edwards JW, McElrath TF, Garmire L, Myatt L; Global Pregnancy Collaboration. Subtypes of Preeclampsia: Recognition and Determining Clinical Usefulness. Hypertension. 2021;77(5):1430–1441. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14781.
Review
For citations:
Rudenko DB, Solovyeva AV, Spitsyna MA, Mamchich DS. Prediction of preeclampsia in pregnant women with comorbid conditions. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2026;20(5):120-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-119
JATS XML

































