Laparoscopic conservative myomectomy at 28 weeks of pregnancy (case report)
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-156
Abstract
Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors, the emergence and progression of which during pregnancy can increase the frequency of pregnancy and child birth complications. Currently, there is a recorded increase in the number of patients diagnosed with myoma among pregnant women. This is primarily due to the manifestation of the pathology at the younger age, and secondly, it is caused by an increase in the average age of pregnant women, which necessitates the development of methods for the prevention and therapy of this condition during pregnancy. We present a clinical case of a patient who was admitted as an emergency to the St. Petersburg State Health Care Foundation “Mariinsky City Hospital” with complaints of abdominal pain. The preliminary diagnosis of “Acute appendicitis” was ruled out during the examination. Also was identified a serious circulatory disorder in the myoma node (necrotizing fibroid). Patient V., a first-time pregnant, was transferred to the Perinatal Center of the Federal State budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “St Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation with the diagnosis: “Pregnancy 28 weeks and 4 days. Uterine fibroid, subserous type. Impaired blood supply to the fibroid node”. Due to intractable pain syndrome and the ultrasound findings (uterine fibroid with signs of impaired blood supply), a laparoscopic conservative myomectomy was performed. The pregnancy was carried to full term, at 40 weeks and 1 day. The birth was vaginal. The performed laparoscopic treatment confirms the effectiveness of surgical intervention when a clinic of fibroid node necrosis develops during pregnancy. Early diagnosis and timely adequate treatment make it possible to achieve successful pregnancy outcomes, including reaching full term.
About the Authors
A. M. PetuhovaRussian Federation
Anna M. Petukhova, Student
2, Litovskaya St., St Petersburg, 194100
A. A. Khalikova
Russian Federation
Adelina A. Khalikova, Student
2, Litovskaya St., St Petersburg, 194100
A. L. Platoshina
Russian Federation
Anastasiia L. Platoshina, Student
2, Litovskaya St., St Petersburg, 194100
P. K. Finskaia
Russian Federation
Polina K. Finskaia, Student
2, Litovskaya St., St Petersburg, 194100
D. S. Rossolko
Russian Federation
Dmitry S. Rossolko, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2, Litovskaya St., St Petersburg, 194100
L. V. Kurdyinko
Russian Federation
Ludmila V. Kurdyinko, Head of the Obstetric and Physiological Department
2, Litovskaya St., St Petersburg, 194100
References
1. Marlina D, Utomo A, Susilo AFP, Aditiyono A, Adriansyah PNA, Aziz MA. An Unusual and Successful Pregnancy With Multiple Large Uterine Fibroids Delivered by Cesarean Myomectomy. J Med Cases. 2025;16(3):95–101. https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc5073.
2. Bubmann J, Wild CM, Dannecker C, Franitza M, Eser B, Seefried MC et al. Review on Symptomatic pedunculated leiomyomas in pregnancy with special consideration of an example case. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025;311(6):1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07840-4.
3. Bushtyreva IO, Kuznetsova NB, Doroshenko TA, Voronova OV, Barinova VV. Myomectomy during pregnancy. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya (Russian Federation). 2022;(2):125–132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.2.125-132.
4. Buyanova SN, Son DY, Babunashvili EL, Shuginin IO, Kovalenko TS, Petrakova SA, Puchkova NV. Myomectomy during pregnancy and caesarean section. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2023;23(1):23–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20232301123.
5. Datir SG, Bhake A. Management of Uterine Fibroids and Its Complications During Pregnancy: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31080. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31080.
6. Cavaliere AF, Vidiri A, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, La Milia MC, Perossini S et al. Surgical Treatment of “Large Uterine Masses” in Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212139.
7. Ruiz J. Arrest of labor secondary to large uterine fibroid. Clin Case Rep. 2024;12(4):е8806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.8806.
8. Don EE, Vissers G, Landman AJEMC, de Groot CJM, Mijatovic V, de Boer MA, Huirne JAF. Preterm birth and uterine fibroid necrosis: The clinical presentation illustrated in a case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;299:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.002.
9. Адамян ЛВ, Андреева ЕН, Абсатарова ЮС, Артымук НВ, Белокриницкая ТЕ, Беженарь ВФ и др. Клинические рекомендации «Миома матки». М.; 2024. Режим доступа: https://legalacts.ru/doc/klinicheskie-rekomendatsii-miomamatki-odobreny-minzdravom-rossii/.
10. Khamidullina EF, Davidyan LYu, Markevich MP. Characteristics of the first trimester of pregnancy in women with uterine fibroids. Ulyanovsk Medicobiological Journal. 2020;(4):40–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34014/2227-1848-2020-4-40-50.
11. Balulescu L, Brasoveanu S, Pirtea M, Grigoras D, Secoșan C, Olaru F et al. The Impact of Laparoscopic Myomectomy on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med. 2024;14(4):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/JPM14040340.
12. Spyropoulou K, Kosmas I, Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Kalogiannidis I, Athanasiadis A et al. Myomectomy during pregnancy: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.018.
13. Otten LA, Lama S, Otten JW, Winkler K, Ralser DJ, Egger EK, Alexander M. Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for uterus-preserving myomectomy: a retrospective analysis on patient-reported outcome, postoperative morbidity and pregnancy outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025;311(5):1359–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07818-2.
14. Babunashvili EL, Son DY, Buyanova SN, Schukina NA, Popov AA, Chechneva MA et al. Outcomes of Laparotomic Myomectomy during Pregnancy for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9):64–66. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196406.
15. Ordás P, Spagnolo E, Fernández LG, Diestro Tejeda MD, Lafuente P et al. Comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes in women with uterine leiomyomas after laparoscopic vs. abdominal myomectomy: A single-center cohort study. Front Surg. 2022;9:997–998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.997078.
16. Kim YR, Na ED, Jung JE, Moon JH, Lee JY. Clinical features at the time of non-hysteroscopic myomectomy before pregnancy, which affect adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):896. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05240-7.
17. Lu B, Wang Q, Yan L, Yu K, Cai Y. Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;14(4):9685585. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9685585.
18. Balulescu L, Brasoveanu S, Pirtea M, Grigoras D, Secoșan C, Olaru F et al. The Impact of Laparoscopic Myomectomy on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med. 2024;14(4):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14040340.
19. Dinsa LH, Eticha AD, Terefe MT. Successful myomectomy during pregnancy for the indication of acute lower abdominal pain with red degenerative myoma or ovarian torsion? “Case report”. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024;12:2050313Х241301605. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X241301605.
20. Won S, Choi SH, Kim SJ, Lee N, Shim SH, Kim M et al. Comparison of cesarean delivery outcome after robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(1):12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2022.06.016.
Review
For citations:
Petuhova AM, Khalikova AA, Platoshina AL, Finskaia PK, Rossolko DS, Kurdyinko LV. Laparoscopic conservative myomectomy at 28 weeks of pregnancy (case report). Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2026;20(5):128-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-156
JATS XML

































