ON THE ISSUE OF THE PECULIARITIES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF VARIOUS HISTOLOGICAL VARIANTS OF AMELOBLASTOMA
https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2017-14-128-131
Abstract
The typical treatment of ameloblastoma is by surgery. The result of the procedure nevertheless does not always lead to complete healing of the sickness but to a recurrence during the post-operative period. It has been reported by a number of authors that the recurrence of the condition is influenced by a number of factors such as the kind of surgical intervention, the histological variant of the ameloblastoma and the incomplete removal of the tumor. The purpose of this research is to study the incidence of recurrence of ameloblastoma after surgery, taking into consideration type of surgery and size of the tumor. A study of 76 cases of ameloblastoma with different histological structures was undertaken in the laboratory of pathological anatomy of Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery. Data such as the recurrence of the disease and tumors size was collected, registered and analysed. The size of the tumors was expressed in conventional units. The analysis showed that basal cell and plexiform variants of ameloblastoma are often relate to cases with aggressive clinical courses. The tendency to the recurrence of the disease was also observed in the follicular and acanthomatous variants. According to the results of this study, cases of peripheral variants of ameloblastoma have the best prognosis.
About the Authors
N. S. Tsimbalist
Российский университет дружбы народов.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. F. Rybalskaya
Российский университет дружбы народов.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. A. Semkin
Отделение хирургической стоматологии Центрального научно-исследовательского института стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Prof.
A. I. Nerobeev
Клиника челюстно-лицевой хирургии и стоматологии Центрального научно-исследовательского института стоматологии и челюстно-лицевой хирургии
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Prof.
I. I. Babichenko
Российский университет дружбы народов
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Prof.
References
1. Kurppa KJ, Catón J, Morgan PR, Ristimäki A, Ruhin B, Kellokoski J, Elenius K, Heikinheimo K. High frequency of BRAF V600E mutations in ameloblastoma. J Pathol, 2014 Apr, 232(5): 492-8. doi: 10.1002/path.4317.
2. Dandriyal R, Gupta A, Pant S, Baweja HH. Surgical management of ameloblastoma: Conservative or radical approach. Natl J Maxillofac Surg, 2011 Jan, 2(1): 22-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.85849
3. Laborde A, Nicot R, Wojcik T, Ferri J, Raoul G. Ameloblastoma of the jaws: Management and recurrence rate. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2017 Feb, 134(1): 7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.09.004.
4. Catunda IS, Vasconcelos BC, Macedo Neres BJ, de Araujo RA, Ponzi EA. Conservative treatment of an aggressive odontogenic tumor: a case report. Gen Dent, 2013 Sep-Oct, 61(6): 8-12.
5. Калакуцкий Н.В., Тюрин А.Г., Журавлев И.В. Патоморфологические аспекты амелобластомы, ее диагностика и подход к лечению. Институт стоматологии, 2012, 1(54): 56-57.
6. Milman T, Ying GS, Pan W, LiVolsi V. Ameloblastoma: 25 Year Experience at a Single Institution. Head Neck Pathol, 2016 Dec, 10(4): 513-520. doi: 10.1007/s12105-016-0734-5.
7. Cunha EM, Fernandes AV, Versiani MA, Loyola AM. Unicystic ameloblastoma: a possible pitfall in periapical diagnosis. Int Endod J, 2005 May, 38(5): 334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00956.x.
8. Smith I. Recurrent ameloblastoma of the mandible. J Maxillofac Surg, 1976, Mar, 4(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0503(76)80002-1.
9. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA, Nikai H, Takata T, Kudo Y. Peripheral ameloblastoma: biological profile based on 160 cases from the literature. Oral Oncol, 2001 Jan, 37(1): 17-27. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(00)00064-6.
10. Cranin AN, Bennett J, Solomon M, Quarcoo S. Massive granular cell ameloblastoma with metastasis: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1987 Sep, 45(9): 800-4. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90207-2.
11. Becelli R, Morello R, Renzi G, Matarazzo G, Dominici C. Treatment of recurrent mandibular ameloblastoma with segmental resection and revascularized fibula free flap. J Craniofac Surg, 2011 May, 22(3): 1163-5. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318210bc34.
12. Vayvada H, Mola F, Menderes A, Yilmaz M. Surgical management of ameloblastoma in the mandible: Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction with free fibula or deep circumflex iliac artery flap (evaluation of the long-term estheticand functional results). J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006 Oct, 64(10): 1532-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.065.
13. Sammartino G, Zarrelli C, Urciuolo V, di Lauro AE, di Lauro F, Santarelli A, Giannone N, Lo Muzio L. Effectiveness of a new decisional algorithm in managing mandibular ameloblastomas: a 10-years experience. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007 Jun, 45(4): 306-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.08.023.
14. Suma MS, Sundaresh KJ, Shruthy R, Mallikarjuna R. Ameloblastoma: an aggressive lesion of the mandible. BMJ Case Rep, 2013 Oct 9, 2013: 200483. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-200483.
15. Chae MP, Smoll NR, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Establishing the natural history and growth rate of ameloblastoma with implications for management: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015 Feb 23, 10(2): e0117241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117241.
16. Kovács A, Wagner M, Ghahremani M. Considerations on a long-term course of a plexiform ameloblastoma with a recurrence in the soft tissue. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex, 1999, 62: 48-53.
17. Shaikhi K et al. Morphological variants of ameloblastoma and their mimickers. NAJ Med Sci, 2012, 5(1): 20-8. doi: 10.7156/v5i1p020.
18. Masthan KMK, Anitha N, Krupaa J, Manikkam S. Ameloblastoma. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, 2015, 7(Suppl1): 167-170. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155891.
19. Ueno S, Mushimoto K, Shirasu R. Prognostic evaluation of ameloblastoma based on histologic and radiographic typing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1989 Jan, 47(1): 11-5.
20. Shakya H, Khare V, Pardhe N, Mathur E, Chouhan M. Basal cell ameloblastoma of mandible: a rare case report with review. Case Rep Dent, 2013, 2013: 187820. doi: 10.1155/2013/187820.
21. Sridhar M, Bhaskar Reddy LR, Kharat S, Mahesh BS, Gandi L, Mahendra A, Nigam P, Grewal P. Basal cell ameloblastoma: a rare histological variant of an uncommon tumor. Niger J Surg, 2015 Jan-Jun, 21(1): 66-9. doi: 10.4103/1117-6806.152730
22. Meshram M, Sagarka L, Dhuvad J, Anchlia S, Vyas S, Shah H. Conservative Management of Unicystic Ameloblastoma in Young Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Trial and Review of Literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2017 Sep, 16(3): 333-341. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0987-2.
23. Кириченко Е.Н. Использование стереолитографического моделирования у пациентов с амелобластомой нижней челюсти. Альманах современной науки и образования, 2014, 5-6(84):78-82.
Review
For citations:
Tsimbalist NS, Rybalskaya VF, Semkin VA, Nerobeev AI, Babichenko II. ON THE ISSUE OF THE PECULIARITIES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF VARIOUS HISTOLOGICAL VARIANTS OF AMELOBLASTOMA. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2017;(14):128-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2017-14-128-131
Views:
880
Email this article 