Fertility index after surgical treatment of endometriosis as a predictor of pregnancy
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-555
Abstract
Introduction. Endometriosis is a common pelvic disorder and is frequently associated with infertility. The rAFS/ASRM classification reflects the anatomic extent of disease but has limited ability to predict subsequent pregnancy.
Aim. To develop and substantiate a clinical decision algorithm for infertility management (expectant management, intrauterine insemination, and assisted reproductive technologies [ART]) based on contemporary clinical evidence on the development and prognostic value of the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI).
Materials and methods. This work was designed as a methodological paper with elements of an analytical literature review, drawing on original studies and a published systematic review/meta-analysis on EFI. The search strategy covered PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and eLIBRARY.ru (through December 2024). Search terms were: (“Endometriosis Fertility Index” OR EFI OR Adamson) AND endometriosis AND (infertility OR subfertility) AND (laparoscopy OR surgery) AND (pregnancy OR non-ART). A total of 312 records were identified; after removal of 54 duplicates, 258 remained; 48 full-text articles were assessed; 27 were excluded (no EFI and/or outcome data, review/case report, insufficient data); 21 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Quantitative synthesis: one published meta-analysis was used. Results. EFI demonstrates a prognostic gradient: the cumulative pregnancy rate within 36 months increases from ~10% for EFI 0–2 to ~60–70% for EFI 9–10 and outperforms rAFS/ASRM in outcome discrimination (AUC 0.64–0.85; pooled ~0.71). Conclusions. EFI is a practical tool for fertility stratification after surgical treatment of endometriosis; the proposed algorithm supports individualized selection of management strategies. A total of 18 and 23 sources were used to substantiate the Introduction and Discussion, respectively (39 overall).
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. IvshinRussian Federation
Aleksandr A. Ivshin, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Dermatovenerology
31, Krasnoarmeiskaya St., Petrozavodsk, 185035, Republic of Karelia
O. O. Pogodin
Russian Federation
Oleg O. Pogodin, Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Head of the Gynecological Department
9, Syktyvkarskaya St., Petrozavodsk, 185002, Republic of Karelia
References
1. Adamyan LV, Martirosyan YO, Asaturova AV. Etiopathogenesis of endometriosisassociated infertility (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2018;24(2):28–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201824228-33.
2. Chuprynin VD, Melnikov MV, Buralkina NA, Chursin VV, Veredchenko AV, Burykina PN et al. Current ideas on management tactics for patients with infiltrating endometriosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2015;(11):16–22. (In Russ.) Available at: https://aig-journal.ru/articles/Sovremennyepredstavleniya-o-taktike-vedeniya-bolnyh-s-infiltrativnymendometriozom.html.
3. Almova IK, Khilkevich EG, Chuprynin VD, Tikhomirova AA, Asaturova AV, Chursin VV. Clinical and diagnostic features of retrocervical endometriosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2018;(6):45–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.6.45-53.
4. Saiddanesh ShF, Chuprynin VD, Khilkevich EG, Buralkina NA, Pavlovich SV, Danilov AYu, Chursin VV. Current methods for diagnosing the common forms of endometriosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2017;(5):39–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.5.39-43.
5. Lisovskaya EV, Khilkevich EG, Chuprynin VD, Melnikov MV, Ipatova MV. Quality of life in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2020;(3):116–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.3.116-126.
6. Adamyan LV, Andreeva EN. The rarest forms of endometriosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(1):45–53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20222801145.
7. Melnikov MV, Chuprynin VD, Askolskaya SV, Khabas GN, Khachatryan AM, Matronitsky RB, Veredchenko AV et al. Infiltrative endometriosis in reproductive-aged patients: Diagnosis and surgical tactics. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2012;(7):42–50. (In Russ.) Available at: https://en.aigjournal.ru/articles/Diagnostika-i-taktika-hirurgicheskogolecheniya-infiltrativnogo-endometrioza-u-pacientok-reproduktivnogovozrasta.html.
8. Orazov MR, Radzinsky VE, Khamoshina MB, Mikhaleva LM, Volkova SV, Abitova MZ. Reasons for endometriosis-associated infertility. Reproductive Medicine. 2020;2(43):43–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37800/RM2020-1-17.
9. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L et al.; ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009.
10. Practice bulletin no. 114: management of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):223–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e8b073.
11. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):817–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81391-X.
12. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(3):351–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x.
13. Wang W, Li R, Fang T, Huang L, Ouyang N, Wang L et al. Endometriosis fertility index score maybe more accurate for predicting the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation than r-AFS classification in women with endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-11-112.
14. Hornstein MD, Gleason RE, Orav J, Haas ST, Friedman AJ, Rein MS et al. The reproducibility of the revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(5):1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55921-4.
15. Guzick DS, Silliman NP, Adamson GD, Buttram VC Jr, Canis M, Malinak LR, Schenken RS. Prediction of pregnancy in infertile women based on the American Society for Reproductive Medicine’s revised classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):822–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81392-1.
16. Boujenah J, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Herbemont C, Bricou A, Sifer C, Poncelet C. Use of the endometriosis fertility index in daily practice: A prospective evaluation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;219:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.10.001.
17. Adamson GD. Endometriosis classification: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(4):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a3ba.
18. Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, Adamson GD, Keckstein J, Taylor HS, Abrao MS et al.; World Endometriosis Society Sao Paulo Consortium. World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(2):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew293.
19. Adamson GD, Pasta DJ. Endometriosis fertility index: The new, validated endometriosis staging system. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(5):1609–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.035.
20. Tomassetti C, Geysenbergh B, Meuleman C, Timmerman D, Fieuws S, D’Hooghe T. External validation of the endometriosis fertility index (EFI) staging system for predicting non-ART pregnancy after endometriosis surgery. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(5):1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det017.
21. Adamson GD, Hurd SJ, Pasta DJ, Rodriguez BD. Laparoscopic endometriosis treatment: Is it better? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1993;48(6):432–434. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199306000-00022.
22. Adamson GD, Subak LL, Pasta DJ, Hurd SJ, von Franque O, Rodriguez BD. Comparison of CO2 laser laparoscopy with laparotomy for treatment of endometriomata. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(5):965–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55010-9.
23. Canis M, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, Manhes H, Mage G, Bruhat MA. Incidence of bilateral adnexal disease in severe endometriosis (revised American Fertility Society [AFS], stage IV): Should a stage V be included in the AFS classification? Fertil Steril. 1992;57(3):691–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54924-3.
24. Vesali S, Razavi M, Rezaeinejad M, Maleki-Hajiagha A, Maroufizadeh S, Sepidarkish M. Endometriosis fertility index for predicting non-assisted reproductive technology pregnancy after endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2020;127(7):800–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16107.
25. Vercellini P, Vendola N, Bocciolone L, Rognoni MT, Carinelli SG, Candiani GB. Reliability of the visual diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(6):1198–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54744-X.
26. Canis M, Bouquet De Jolinières J, Wattiez A, Pouly JL, Mage G, Manhes H, Bruhat MA. Classification of endometriosis. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;7(4):759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80462-6.
27. Redwine DB. The distribution of endometriosis in the pelvis by age groups and fertility. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(1):173–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49956-5.
28. Vercellini P, Trespidi L, De Giorgi O, Cortesi I, Parazzini F, Crosignani PG. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: relation to disease stage and localization. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58089-3.
29. Adamson GD. Endometriosis Fertility Index. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(3):186–192. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32836091da.
30. Maheux-Lacroix S, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Won H, Budden A, Adamson D, Abbott JA. Endometriosis fertility index predicts live births following surgical resection of moderate and severe endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2243–2249. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex291.
31. Tomassetti C, Geysenbergh B, Meuleman C, Timmerman D, Fieuws S, D’Hooghe T. External validation of the endometriosis fertility index (EFI) staging system for predicting non-ART pregnancy after endometriosis surgery. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(5):1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det017.
32. Zhang X, Liu D, Huang W, Wang Q, Feng X, Tan J. Prediction of Endometriosis Fertility Index in patients with endometriosis-associated infertility after laparoscopic treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.012.
33. Boujenah J, Bonneau C, Hugues JN, Sifer C, Poncelet C. External validation of the Endometriosis Fertility Index in a French population. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(1)119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.028.
34. Jacobson TZ, Duffy JM, Barlow D, Farquhar C, Koninckx PR, Olive D. Laparoscopic surgery for subfertility associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD001398. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001398.pub3.
35. Hobo R, Nakagawa K, Usui C, Sugiyama R, Ino N, Motoyama H et al. The Endometriosis Fertility Index Is Useful for Predicting the Ability to Conceive without Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment after Laparoscopic Surgery, Regardless of Endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):493–498. https://doi.org/10.1159/000480454.
36. Barri PN, Coroleu B, Tur R, Barri-Soldevila PN, Rodríguez I. Endometriosisassociated infertility: Surgery and IVF, a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.026.
37. Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Cammilli F, Bracco GL, Scarselli G. Endometriosis and infertility. Surgery and ART: An integrated approach for successful management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138(1):54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.010.
38. Adamson GD, Pasta DJ. Surgical treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility: Meta-analysis compared with survival analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(6):1488–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(94)90392-1.
39. Boujenah J, Hugues JN, Sifer C, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Bricou A, Poncelet C. Second live birth after undergoing assisted reproductive technology in women operated on for endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.039.
Review
For citations:
Ivshin AA, Pogodin OO. Fertility index after surgical treatment of endometriosis as a predictor of pregnancy. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2025;(23):168-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-555
JATS XML


































