Etiopathogenetic mechanisms of action of antiseptics in the treatment of superficial pyoderma
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-083
Abstract
This article analyzes current approaches to topical therapy for pyoderma, an infectious skin disease primarily caused by staphylococci and streptococci. This review covers the etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and some clinical aspects of superficial pyoderma. Pyoderma is an infectious and inflammatory skin disease caused by bacteria. This dermatosis is the most common disease. It should be noted that pyoderma can occur independently or develop secondary to other skin conditions, thereby worsening the underlying condition and contributing to relapses. Recent studies highlight the importance of bacterial biofilms, both mono- and polyspecies, in the development of chronic recurrent pyoderma. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms colonize eccrineducts in the skin and affect keratinocytes, altering their cytokine production, leading to impaired differentiation and apoptosis. These processes disrupt the skin’s barrier function and contribute to the exacerbation of both the underlying disease and the development of bacterial complications. The most common clinical manifestations of pyoderma are impetigo and folliculitis, while deep forms are less common. Treatment includes topical antiseptic and antibacterial agents, and, if necessary, systemic antibiotic therapy. The steady increase in microbial resistance to known antimicrobial drugs determines the need for research to assess the effectiveness and safety of alternative therapies using local antiseptics. The article presents Russian and international studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the antiseptic Miramistin® against Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli and others bacterial, as well as in preventing the formation of mono- and multispecies biofilms. The findings support the use of Miramistin® as a topical antiseptic in dermatological practice, particularly for superficial pyoderma.
About the Authors
E. E. ZhiltsovaRussian Federation
Elena E. Zhiltsova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Dermatovenerology; Dermatovenerologist of the 2nd Dermatovenereology Department of the Clinic
9, Vysokovoltnaya St., Ryazan, 390013;
9, Sportivnaya St., Ryazan, 390046
O. V. Bakovetskaya
Russian Federation
Olga V. Bakovetskaya, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Head of the Department of Biology
9, Vysokovoltnaya St., Ryazan, 390013
D. V. Tebenikhin
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Tebenikhin, Dermatovenerologist
26b, Biryuzov St., Ryazan, 390039
M. N. Levina
Russian Federation
Maria N. Levina, Student
9, Vysokovoltnaya St., Ryazan, 390013
References
1. Кубанов АА, Самцов АВ, Дубенский ВВ, Хайрутдинов ВР, Дубенский ВВ, Чикин ВВ и др. Пиодермии. Клинические рекомендации. 2025. 39 c. Режим доступа: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/232_2.
2. Maher E, Anokhin A. Bacterial Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2024;40(1):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2023.09.006.
3. Tamrazova OB, Shmeleva EA, Mironova AK, Dubovets NF. Current views on etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment of pyodermas in children. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2020;(1):118–129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-1-118-129.
4. Ibrahim F, Khan T, Pujalte GG. Bacterial Skin Infections. Prim Care. 2015;42(4):485–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2015.08.001.
5. Gonzalez T, Biagini Myers JM, Herr AB, Khurana Hershey GK. Staphylococcal Biofilms in Atopic Dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17(12):81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-017-0750-x.
6. Gandhi S, Ojha AK, Ranjan KP, Neelima. Clinical and bacteriological aspects of pyoderma. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(10):492–495. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.101997.
7. Samtsov AV. Topical therapy for pyoderma. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii. 2020;96(5):59–64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25208/vdv1167-2020-96-5-59-6.
8. Silina LV, Bibicheva TV, Myatenko NI, Pereverzeva IV. Structure, function and value of the skin microbiome under normal and pathological conditions. RMJ. 2018;8(II):92–96. (In Russ.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/vnbicc.
9. Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis J, Young AC et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science. 2009;324(5931):1190–1192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171700.
10. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(4):244–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2537.
11. Ferretti P, Farina S, Cristofolini M, Girolomoni G, Tett A, Segata N. Experimental metagenomics and ribosomal profiling of the human skin microbiome. Exp Dermatol. 2017;26(3):211–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13210.
12. Otto M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;17:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2013.11.004.
13. Qin L, McCausland JW, Cheung GY, Otto M. PSM-Mec-A Virulence Determinant that Connects Transcriptional Regulation, Virulence, and Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococci. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01293.
14. Nilsson M, Sørensen OE, Mörgelin M, Weineisen M, Sjöbring U, Herwald H. Activation of human polymorphonuclear neutrophils by streptolysin O from Streptococcus pyogenes leads to the release of proinflammatory mediators. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95(6):982–990. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH05-08-0572.
15. Barotova MR. The role of skin microbioma in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal and streptococcal piodermia. Research Focus. 2025;4(11):294–298. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17914056.
16. Gritsenko VA, Mavzyutov AR, Pashkova TM, Kartashova OL, Tyapaeva YV, Belozertseva YP. Genetic profile Staphylococcus aureus, isolated from bacterial carriers and patients with infectious and inflammatory pathology. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii i Immunobiologii. 2018;95(4):56–62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36233/0372-9311-2018-4-56-62.
17. Burova LA, Totolian AA. Major pathogenicity factors of Streptococcus pyogenes. Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity. 2022;12(1):33–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-MPF-1723.
18. Tamrazova OB, SHmeleva EA, Mironova AK, Dubovets NF. Modern view on etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment of pyodermas in children. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2020;(1):118–129. (In Russ.) https://doi.rg/10.21518/2079-701X-2020-1-118-129.
19. Linz MS, Mattappallil A, Finkel D, Parker D. Clinical Impact of Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Antibiotics. 2023;12(3):557. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030557.
20. Maher E, Anokhin A. Bacterial Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2024;40(1):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2023.09.006.
21. Guerra KC, Toncar A, Krishnamurthy K. Miliaria. [Updated 2024 Sep 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537176/.
22. Lalor LE, Chiu YE. Rare Vesiculopustular Eruptions of the Neonatal Period. Clin Perinatol. 2020;47(1):53–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2019.09.005.
23. El Anzi O, Hassam B. Widespread miliaria crystallina: about a case. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30:69. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.69.15383.
24. Tamrazova OB, Stadnikova AS, Radchenko ER. Typical and atypical forms of pyoderma in children: differential diagnosis challenges. Klinicheskaya Dermatologiya i Venerologiya. 2022;21(5):663–670. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/klinderma202221051663.
25. Brandwein M, Steinberg D, Meshner S. Microbial biofilms and the human skin microbiome. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-016-0004-z.
26. Stepanenko IS, Kosov VA, Mikhailova LV, Timofeeva AS. Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus resistance in the antibiotic era (literature review). Astrakhan Medical Journal. 2025;20(2):27–50. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.astmedj.ru/jour/article/view/554.
27. Safarova ShSh, Oripov RA. The role of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes antibiotic resistance in the development of chronic pyoderma. Research Focus. 2025;4(12):321–326. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18075081.
28. Gonzalez T, Biagini Myers JM, Herr AB, Khurana Hershey GK. Staphylococcal Biofilms in Atopic Dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17(12):81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-017-0750-x.
29. Bowen AC, Mahé A, Hay RJ, Andrews RM, Steer AC, Tong SY, Carapetis JR. The Global Epidemiology of Impetigo: A Systematic Review of the Population Prevalence of Impetigo and Pyoderma. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0136789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136789.
30. Danilova TA, Danilina GA, Adzhieva AA, Minko AG, Alekseeva NV. Biofilms formation by group A streptococci of various and study of antibiotics effect on this process. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii, Epidemiologii i Immunobiologii. 2015;(2):50–54. (In Russ.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/vobeef.
31. Daeschlein G. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int Wound J. 2013;10(S1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12175.
32. Pritulo OA, Borodavkin DV, Kasaeva GR, Ravlyuk DA. The efficacy of using modern antiseptic drugs in ointment form in the treatment of pyoderma and secondarily infected dermatoses. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2023;26(6):623–634. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17816/dv567955.
33. Ziryanov SK. Clinical and pharmacological analysis of the application of antiseptic drugs in practical medicine. Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapy. 2022;(1):10–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46393/27132129_2022_1_1.
34. Frolov NA, Seferyan MA, Valeev AB, Saverina EA, Detusheva EV, Vereshchagin AN. The Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential of New Water-Soluble Tris-Quaternary Ammonium Compounds. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310512.
35. Ioannou CJ, Hanlon GW, Denyer SP. Action of disinfectant quaternary ammonium compounds against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(1):296–306. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00375-06.
36. Osmanov A, Farooq Z, Richardson MD, Denning DW. The antiseptic Miramistin: a review of its comparative in vitro and clinical activity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2020;44(4):399–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuaa012.
37. Wessels S, Ingmer H. Modes of action of three disinfectant active substances: a review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013;67(3):456–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.09.006.
38. Fromm-Dornieden C, Rembe JD, Schäfer N, Böhm J, Stuermer EK. Cetylpyridinium chloride and miramistin as antiseptic substances in chronic wound management – prospects and limitations. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(Pt 4):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000034.
39. Danilova TA, Danilina GA, Adzhieva AA Minko AG, Nikolaeva TN, Zhukhovitskiy VG, Pronin AV. The effect of miramistin and fosprenil on microbial biofilms. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2017;163(4):435–439. (In Russ.) Available at: https://elibrary.ru/ylmlpb.
40. Rembe JD, Thompson VD, Stuermer EK. Antimicrobials cetylpyridiniumchloride and miramistin demonstrate non-inferiority and no “protein-error” compared to established wound care antiseptics in vitro. AIMS Microbiol. 2022;8(4):372–387. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2022026.
41. Dikke GB. Prevention of sexually transmitted infections in the era of antibiotic resistance. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2025;19(17):62–72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2025-435.
42. Kuznetsova YuK, Fairuzova YuYu, Kuznetsova KYu, Sirmais NS. Folliculitis and resistance to antibacterial therapy: How to cope with resistance? Lechaschi Vrach. 2016;(5):60–65. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.lvrach.ru/2016/05/15436472.
Review
For citations:
Zhiltsova EE, Bakovetskaya OV, Tebenikhin DV, Levina MN. Etiopathogenetic mechanisms of action of antiseptics in the treatment of superficial pyoderma. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2026;(2):31-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2026-083
JATS XML
































